Skip to main content
Log in

Recruiting Vulnerable Populations into Research: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Interventions

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Members of vulnerable populations are underrepresented in research studies.

Objective

To evaluate and synthesize the evidence regarding interventions to enhance enrollment of vulnerable populations into health research studies.

Data sources

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Web of Science database, personal sources, hand searching of related journals, and article references. Studies that contained data on recruitment interventions for vulnerable populations (minority, underserved, poor, rural, urban, or inner city) and for which the parent study (study for which recruitment was taking place) was an intervention study were included. A total of 2,648 study titles were screened and 48 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 56 parent studies. Two investigators extracted data from each study.

Results

African Americans were the most frequently targeted population (82% of the studies), while 46% targeted Hispanics/Latinos. Many studies assessed 2 or more interventions, including social marketing (82% of studies), community outreach (80%), health system recruitment (52%), and referrals (28%). The methodologic rigor varied substantially. Only 40 studies (71%) incorporated a control group and 21% used statistical analysis to compare interventions. Social marketing, health system, and referral recruitment were each found to be the most successful intervention about 35–45% of the studies in which they were attempted, while community outreach was the most successful intervention in only 2 of 16 studies (13%) in which it was employed. People contacted as a result of social marketing were no less likely to enroll than people contacted through other mechanisms.

Conclusions

Further work with greater methodologic rigor is needed to identify evidence-based strategies for increasing minority enrollment in research studies; community outreach, as an isolated strategy, may be less successful than other strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Revitalization Act. B: Sec. 131–133; 1993.

  2. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–6 (Jun 9).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levkoff S, Sanchez H. Lessons learned about minority recruitment and retention from the Centers on Minority Aging and Health Promotion. Gerontologist. 2003;43(1):18–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto HA, McCaskill-Stevens W, Wolfe P, Marcus AC. Physician perspectives on increasing minorities in cancer clinical trials: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Initiative. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8 Suppl):S78–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shavers-Hornaday VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Torner JC. Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethn Health. 1997;2(1–2):31–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas S, Williams M, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:537–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(21):2458–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(11):1773–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris Y, Gorelick PB, Samuels P, Bempong I. Why African Americans may not be participating in clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88(10):630–4 (Oct).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouton CP, Harris S, Rovi S, Solorzano P, Johnson MS. Barriers to black women’s participation in cancer clinical trials. J Natl Med Assoc. 1997;89(11):721–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson SB, Ashley M, Haynes MA. Attitude of African-Americans regarding prostate cancer clinical trials. J Community Health. 1996;21(2):77–87 (Apr).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone VE, Mauch MY, Steger K, Janas SF, Craven DE. Race, gender, drug use, and participation in AIDS clinical trials. Lessons from a municipal hospital cohort. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(3):150–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Swanson GM, Ward AJ. Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(23):1747–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Unson CG, Dunbar N, Curry L, Kenyon L, Prestwood K. The effects of knowledge, attitudes, and significant others on decisions to enroll in a clinical trial on osteoporosis: implications for recruitment of older African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93(10):392–401 (Oct); discussion 02–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown DR, Topcu M. Willingness to participate in clinical treatment research among older African Americans and Whites. Gerontologist. 2003;43(1):62–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson EE, Neighbors HW, Munday C, Jackson JS. Recruitment and retention of African American patients for clinical research: an exploration of response rates in an urban psychiatric hospital. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(5):861–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, et al. Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Medicine/Public Library of Science. 2006;3(2):0001–10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Bolen S, et al. Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evid Rep/Technol Assess. 2005;122:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bushley AW, Cassel K, Hernandez BY, Robinett H, Goodman MT. A tailored multi-media campaign to promote the human papillomavirus cohort study to young women. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):98–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grier S, Bryant CA. Social marketing in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:319–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolen S, Tilburt J, Baffi C, et al. Defining “success” in recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: moving toward a more consistent approach. Cancer. 2006;106(6):1197–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arean PA, Alvidrez J, Nery R, Estes C, Linkins K. Recruitment and retention of older minorities in mental health services research. Gerontologist. 2003;43(1):36–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baigis J, Francis ME, Hoffman M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recruitment strategies in a community-based intervention study of HIV-infected persons. AIDS Care. 2003;15(5):717–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bailey JM, Bieniasz ME, Kmak D, Brenner DE, Ruffin MT. Recruitment and retention of economically underserved women to a cervical cancer prevention trial. Appl Nurs Res. 2004;17(1):55–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Blumenthal DS, Sung J, Coates R, Williams J, Liff J. Recruitment and retention of subjects for a longitudinal cancer prevention study in an inner-city black community. Health Serv Res. 1995;30(1 Pt 2):197–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brewster WR, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, et al. Recruitment strategies for cervical cancer prevention study. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85(2):250–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brill PA, Kohl HW, Rogers T, Collingwood TR, Sterling CL, Blair SN. The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and recruitment, retention, and health improvements in a worksite health promotion program. Am J Health Promot. 1991;5(3):215–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burroughs AR, Visscher WA, Haney TL, et al. Community recruitment process by race, gender, and SES gradient: lessons learned from the Community Health and Stress Evaluation (CHASE) Study experience. J Community Health. 2003;28(6):421–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coleman EA, Tyll L, LaCroix AZ, et al. Recruiting African-American older adults for a community-based health promotion intervention: which strategies are effective? Am J Prev Med. 1997;13(6 Suppl):51–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dennis BP, Neese JB. Recruitment and retention of African American elders into community-based research: lessons learned. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2000;14(1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Derose KP, Hawes-Dawson J, Fox SA, Maldonado N, Tatum A, Kington R. Dealing with diversity: recruiting churches and women for a randomized trial of mammography promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):632–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Escobar-Chaves SL, Tortolero SR, Masse LC, Watson KB, Fulton JE. Recruiting and retaining minority women: findings from the Women on the Move study. Ethn Dis. 2002;12(2):242–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fitzgibbon ML, Prewitt TE, Blackman LR, et al. Quantitative assessment of recruitment efforts for prevention trials in two diverse black populations. Prev Med. 1998;27(6):838–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ford ME, Havstad SL, Davis SD. A randomized trial of recruitment methods for older African American men in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Clin Trials. 2004;1(4):343–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fouad MN, Corbie-Smith G, Curb D, et al. Special populations recruitment for the Women’s Health Initiative: successes and limitations. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(4):335–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gallagher-Thompson D, Arguello D, Johnson C, Rodriguez V, Meyer M. A comparison of outreach strategies for hispanic caregivers of Alzheimer’s victims. Clin Gerontol. 1994;15:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gorelick PB, Richardson D, Hudson E, et al. Establishing a community network for recruitment of African Americans into a clinical trial. The African-American antiplatelet stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) experience. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88(11):701–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Harris KJ, Ahluwalia JS, Catley D, Okuyemi KS, Mayo MS, Resnicow K. Successful recruitment of minorities into clinical trials: the kick it at Swope project. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(4):575–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hill MN, Bone LR, Hilton SC, Roary MC, Kelen GD, Levine DM. A clinical trial to improve high blood pressure care in young urban black men: recruitment, follow-up, and outcomes. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(6):548–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hooks PC, Tsong Y, Baranowski T, Henske JC, Nader PR, Levin JS. Recruitment strategies for multiethnic family and community health research. Fam Community Health. 1988:48–59.

  41. Ives DG, Kuller LH, Schulz R, Traven ND, Lave JR. Comparison of recruitment strategies and associated disease prevalence for health promotion in rural elderly. Prev Med. 1992;21(5):582–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kennedy BM, Conlin PR, Ernst D, Reams P, Charleston JB, Appel LJ. Successfully recruiting a multicultural population: the DASH-Sodium experience. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(1):123–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kiernan M, Phillips K, Fair JM, King AC. Using direct mail to recruit Hispanic adults into a dietary intervention: an experimental study. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22(1):89–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Larkey LK, Staten LK, Ritenbaugh C, et al. Recruitment of Hispanic women to the Women’s Health Initiative. the case of Embajadoras in Arizona. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23(3):289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee RE, McGinnis KA, Sallis JF, Castro CM, Chen AH, Hickmann SA. Active vs. passive methods of recruiting ethnic minority women to a health promotion program. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19(4):378–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lewis CE, George V, Fouad M, Porter V, Bowen D, Urban N. Recruitment strategies in the women’s health trial: feasibility study in minority populations. WHT:FSMP Investigators Group. Women’s Health Trial: Feasibility Study in Minority Populations. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(5):461–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Linnan LA, Emmons KM, Klar N, Fava JL, LaForge RG, Abrams DB. Challenges to improving the impact of worksite cancer prevention programs: comparing reach, enrollment, and attrition using active versus passive recruitment strategies. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24(2):157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Moinpour CM, Atkinson JO, Thomas SM, et al. Minority recruitment in the prostate cancer prevention trial. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8 Suppl):S85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nacif de Brey V, Gonzalez VM. Recruiting for arthritis studies in hard-to-reach populations: a comparison of methods used in an urban Spanish-speaking community. Arthritis Care Res. 1997;10(1):64–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nichols L, Martindale-Adams J, Burns R, et al. Social marketing as a framework for recruitment: illustrations from the REACH study. J Aging Health. 2004;16(5 Suppl):157S–76S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Oakley A, Wiggins M, Turner H, Rajan L, Barker M. Including culturally diverse samples in health research: a case study of an urban trial of social support. Ethn Health. 2003;8(1):29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Paskett ED, DeGraffinreid C, Tatum CM, Margitic SE. The recruitment of African-Americans to cancer prevention and control studies. Prev Med. 1996;25(5):547–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pletsch PK, Howe C, Tenney M. Recruitment of minority subjects for intervention research. Image J Nurs Scholarsh. 1995;27(3):211–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Powell IJ, Gelfand DE, Parzuchowski J, Heilburn L, Franklin A. A successful recruitment process of African American men for early detection of prostate cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:1880–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rowland RM, Fisher KJ, Green M, Dunn AM, Pickering MA, Li F. Recruiting inactive older adults to a neighborhood walking trial: The SHAPE project. J Aging Stud. 2004;18:353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Royal C, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Kittles R, et al. Recruitment experience in the first phase of the African American Hereditary Prostate Cancer (AAHPC) study. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8 Suppl).

  57. Schoenfeld ER, Greene JM, Wu SY, O’Leary E, Forte F, Leske MC. Recruiting participants for community-based research: the Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(7):432–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Smith SR, Jaffe DM, Petty M, Worthy V, Banks P, Strunk RC. Recruitment into a long-term pediatric asthma study during emergency department visits. J Asthma. 2004;41(4):477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sorkness CA, Ford JG, Lemanske RF, Jr., Asthma Clinical Trials N. Recruitment strategies in the Asthma Clinical Research Network. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22(6 Suppl):222S–35S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Stoy DB, Curtis RC, Dameworth KS, et al. The successful recruitment of elderly black subjects in a clinical trial: the CRISP experience. Cholesterol Reduction in Seniors Program. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87(4):280–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Unson CG, Ohannessian C, Kenyon L, Fenster J, Reisine S, Prestwood K. Strategies for enrolling diverse older women in an osteoporosis trial. J Aging Health. 2004;16(5):669–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Appel LJ, et al. Recruitment and retention of minority participants in the DASH controlled feeding trial. DASH Collaborative Research Group. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. Ethn Dis. 1998;8(2):198–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Warren-Findlow J, Prohaska TR, Freedman D. Challenges and opportunities in recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations into health promotion research. Gerontologist. 2003;1:37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Whelton PK, Lee JY, Kusek JW, et al. Recruitment experience in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) Pilot Study. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(4 Suppl):17S–33S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Whitehorse LE, Manzano R, Baezconde-Garbanati LA, Hahn G. Culturally tailoring a physical activity program for hispanic women: recruitment successes of la vida buena’s salsa aerobics. J Health Educ. 1999;30:S18–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wisdom K, Neighbors K, Williams VH, Havstad SL, Tilley BC. Recruitment of African Americans with type 2 diabetes to a randomized controlled trial using three sources. Ethn Health. 2002;7(4):267–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yancey A, McCarthy WJ, Leslie J. Recruiting African-American women to community-based health promotion research. Am J Health Promot. 1998;12(5):335–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Yancey AK, Miles OL, McCarthy WJ, et al. Differential response to targeted recruitment strategies to fitness promotion research by African-American women of varying body mass index. Ethn Disease. 2001;11(1):115–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ, Payne-Wilks K, Roland CL, Levine RS. Recruiting elderly African-American women in cancer prevention and control studies: a multifaceted approach and its effectiveness. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92(4):169–75 (Apr).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Gross C, Mallory R, Heiat A, Krumholz H. Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there? Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:10–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Reed PS, Foley KL, Hatch J, Mutran EJ. Recruitment of older African Americans for survey research: a process evaluation of the community and church-based strategy in The Durham Elders Project. Gerontologist. 2003;43(1):52–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bentley JP, Thacker PG. The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Dickert N, Grady C. What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Doody MM, Sigurdson AS, Kampa D, et al. Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(7):643–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Emanuel EJ. Ending concerns about undue inducement. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32(1):100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1681–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Halpern SD, Karlawish JH, Casarett D, Berlin JA, Asch DA. Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(7):801–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Weise KL, Smith ML, Maschke KJ, Copeland HL. National practices regarding payment to research subjects for participating in pediatric research. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):577–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Arean PA, Gallagher-Thompson D. Issues and recommendations for the recruitment and retention of older ethnic minority adults into clinical research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(5):875–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL. Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(13):3112–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. McCaskill-Stevens W, McKinney MM, Whitman CG, Minasian LM. Increasing minority participation in cancer clinical trials: the minority-based community clinical oncology program experience. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Support and Disclosure

Dr. Gross’s efforts were supported by Claude D. Pepper Older` Americans Independence Center at Yale (P30AG21342).

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cary P. Gross MD.

Appendix

Appendix

Medline search terms

1

Clinical trials or randomized controlled trials or multicenter studies

2

African Americans or Hispanic Americans or African American Continental Ancestry Group or minority groups or social class or socioeconomic factors or poverty or medically underserved area or urban population

3

Patient selection or research subjects, and [(enrol$ or recruit$ or particip$ or enlist$ or attrit$ or retent$).mp.

4

interven$ or initiativ$ or method$ or strateg$ or increase$ or enhanc$).mp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

UyBico, S.J., Pavel, S. & Gross, C.P. Recruiting Vulnerable Populations into Research: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Interventions. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 852–863 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0126-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0126-3

KEY WORDS

Navigation