Skip to main content
Log in

Updating Rurality Index for Small Areas in Spain

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a wide debate about what rural means. An operational definition of rural concept is essential in order to measure health problems, optimize resource allocation and facilitate decision making aimed at closing the gap on inequity between areas. In 2005, the rurality index for Small Areas in Spain (IRAP) was developed using the 1991 Census of Population data. Nevertheless, the concept and definition of rurality may evolve through time. In order to capture these changes, the variables used to make up the rurality index should be reviewed and updated periodically. Along these lines, and within the context of the rural–urban continuum, the aim of this paper is to replicate and update the IRAP using the data provided by the 2001 Census of Population, as well as to describe the changes in rurality observed in each municipality between 1991 and 2001. The index was updated on a Principal Components Factor Analysis, giving rise to a single factor that is correlated to the aging of the population, economic dependency, farming, livestock or fishing-related employment, self-employment, second dwelling ratio, population density, immigration and perception of noises and atmospheric pollution in the surroundings of the residential area. Most variables that made up the 1991 IRAP remain as important components of the 2001 index, indicating the robust nature of the measure. Only 10% of the Spanish municipalities have changed their rurality status between the two Censuses. The 2001 rurality index can be considered a good updated approach to the concept of rurality in Spain as well as an important criterion to social policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1984). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnalte-Alegre, E. (2002). PAC y desarrollo rural: Una relación amor-odio. Información Comercial Española, 803, 45–60. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.mapa.es/es/ministerio/pags/biblioteca/pr_revistas_electronicas.htm#letraI.

  • Ayuntamiento de Aguaviva. (2001). Asociación de municipios contra la despoblación. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.campoyvida.com.

  • Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). The analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, J. (2008). Rural development indicators and diversity in the European Union. Retrieved June 20, 2008 from http://srdc.msstate.edu/measuring/bryden.pdf.

  • Calatrava-Requena, J. (2002). Mujer y desarrollo rural en la globalización: De los proyectos asistenciales a la planificación de género. Información Comercial Española, 803, 73–90. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from htpp://www.mapa.es/es/ministerio/pags/biblioteca/pr_revistas_electronicas.htm#letraI.

  • Dahly, D. L. (2007). Quantifying the urban environment: A scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban-rural dichotomy. Social Science and Medicine, 64(7), 1407–1419. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Aged Care. (2001). Measuring remoteness accesibility: Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA). Retrieved June 20, 2008, from Department of Health and Aged Care, Information and Research Branch, Web site: http:/www.health.gov.au.

  • Entena-Durán, F. (1998). Cambios en la construcción social de lo rural. Madrid: Technos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Delgado, J. L. (1998). La economía española durante el franquismo. Temas para el debate. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.uclm.es/ab/humanidades/profesores/descarga/manuel_ortiz/economia-franquismo.pdf.

  • Harrington, V., & O’Donoghue, D. (1998). Rurality in England and Wales 1991: A replication and extension of the 1981 rurality index. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(2), 178–203. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L. G., Larson, E. H., & Lishner, D. M. (2005). Rural definitions for health policy and research. American Journal of Public Health, 95(7), 1149–1155. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, M. (1989). Defining rural areas: Impact of health care policy and research. Washington: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE. (2004). Censo de población, Viviendas y Hogares, 2001. Madrid: INE.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE. (2008). España en cifras, 2008. Madrid: INE.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAPA. (2003). Libro Blanco de la agricultura y el desarrollo rural. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación). Retrieved June 15, 2008, from http://www.libroblancoagricultura.com/index.asp.

  • Martin, D., Brighman, P., Roderick, P., Barnett, S., & Diamond, I. (2000). The (mis)representation of rural deprivation. Enviromental and Planning, 32, 735–751. doi:10.1068/a32130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocaña-Riola, R., & Sánchez-Cantalejo, C. (2005). Rurality index for small areas in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 73, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocaña-Riola, R., Sánchez-Cantalejo, C., & Fernández-Ajuria, A. (2006). Rural habitat and risk of death in small areas of southern Spain. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 1352–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunde, S., Leduc, E. R., & Berkowitz, J. (2007). Different practice patterns of rural and urban general practitioners are predicted by the general practice rurality index. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, 12(2), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paniagua, A. (2002). Autoempleo de alta cualificación en la España rural. Revista electrónica de geografía y ciencias sociales, 119, 77. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from htpp://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/sn119-77.htm.

  • Paniagua-Mazorra, A., & Hoggart, K. (2002). Lo rural, ¿hechos, discursos o representaciones? Una perspectiva geográfica de un debate clásico. Información Comercial Española, 803, 61–71. [citado 15 Jul 2007]. Retrieved June 15, 2008, from htpp://www.mapa.es/es/ministerio/pags/biblioteca/pr_revistas_electronicas.htm#letraI.

  • Public Health Agency of Canada. (2002). Definitions of “rural”. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from Public Health Agency of Canada, Office of rural health Web site: http:/www.phac-aspc.gc.ca.

  • Redfield, R. (1941). The folk culture of Yucatan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Cantalejo, C., Ocaña-Riola, R. & Fernández-Ajuria, A. (2007). Deprivation index for small areas in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 89, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Wye Group. (2008). Handbook rural households’ livelihood and well-being: Statistics on rural development and agriculture household Iincome. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from Task Force of the Intersecretariat Working Group on Agriculture Statistics and Rural Indicators, UNECE, Eurostat, FAO, OECD, and World Bank Web site: http:/www.unece.org.

  • Weinert, C., & Boik, R. J. (1995). MSU rurality index: Development and evaluation. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Erik Holzinger, Anaité Diaz-Artiga and Alberto Fernández for very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper and Carmen Sánchez-Cantalejo for cartographic contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Ocaña-Riola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prieto-Lara, E., Ocaña-Riola, R. Updating Rurality Index for Small Areas in Spain. Soc Indic Res 95, 267–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9459-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9459-0

Keywords

Navigation