Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Men’s Experience of Psychological Abuse: Conceptualization and Measurement Issues

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper the literature on men’s experience of psychological abuse (in the U.S.) is reviewed and the ability to conceptualize and measure such abuse is reconsidered. Scales used to measure psychological abuse based on the experiences of battered women are critiqued as inadequate as measures of psychological abuse of men. Although both men and women direct psychological abuse toward their partners, violence perpetrated by men and women is not necessarily the same. Adopting a gender role perspective on psychological abuse, we argue that women may use different strategies to hurt men including manipulation and gender role harassment, whereas coercive control paired with physical abuse may constitute one version of (male) intimate partner violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52, 853–865. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4204-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15, 358–380. doi:10.1177/089124301015003003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., Strett, A. E., Brody, G. H. (1996, September). Depression and alcohol abuse: Women’s responses to psychological victimization. Presented to the American Psychological Association National Conference on Psychosocial & Behavioral Factors in Women’s Health, Washington, D.C.

  • Avant, E. M., Swopes, R. M., Davis, J. L., & Elhai, J. D. (2011). Psychological abuse and posttraumatic stress symptoms in college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3080–3097. doi:10.1177/0886260510390954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Miller, S. A., & Siard, C. (2003). Toward a typology of abusive women: Differences between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 153–161. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Roseman, A., Green, C. E., & Ross, J. M. (2008). Intimate partner abuse and PTSD symptomology: Examining mediators of the abuse trauma link. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 809–818. doi:10.1037/a0013808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, K., Arias, I., Desai, S., & Thompson, M. (2004). The differential association of intimate partner physical, sexual, psychological, and stalking violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nationally representative sample of women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 413–421. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048954.50232.d8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 644–658. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00320.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, R., Field, C., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Lipsky, S. (2009). Agreement on reporting of physical, psychological, and sexual violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1318–1337. doi:10.1177/0886260508322181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. G., & Jones, K. D. (2010). Continuum of conflict and control: A conceptualization of intimate partner violence typologies. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 18, 248–254. doi:10.1177/1066480710371795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Nelson, D. A., Yorgason, J. B., Harper, J. M., Ashton, R. H., & Jensen, A. C. (2010). Relational aggression in marriage. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 315–329. doi:10.1002/ab.20349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M. G., & Pearson, T. A. (1985). Perceived causes of divorce: An analysis of interrelationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 179–183. doi:10.2307/352080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, L., & McHugh, M. C. (2008). A post-Newtonian, postmodern approach to science: New methods in social action research. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 73–86). NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, D., Follingstad, D., & Fields, A. (2010). Does context matter in determining psychological abuse? Effects of pattern, harm, relationship, and norms. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 461–474. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9307-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., & Powell-Williams, M. (2007). “Everybody makes choices”: Victim advocates and the social construction of battered women’s victimization and agency. Violence Against Women, 13, 977–1001. doi:10.1177/1077801207305932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9, 167–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1996). Battered women’s strategic response to violence the role of context. In J. L. Edleson & Z. Eisifovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 105–124). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52, 743–756. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. L., & Tolman, R. M. (1992). Intervention for men who batter: An ecological approach. Newbury Park: Sage. doi:10.1177/104973159400400309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., & Vivian, D. (1999). Is partner aggression related to appraisals of coercive control by a partner? Journal of Family Violence, 14, 251–266. doi:10.1023/A:1022862332595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Heyman, R. E., O’Leary, K. D., & Lawrence, E. (1999). Feeling controlled in marriage: A phenomenon specific to physically aggressive couples? Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 20–32. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.1.20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R. (2007). Rethinking current approaches to psychological abuse: Conceptual and methodological issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 439–458. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R. (2011). A measure of severe psychological abuse normed on a nationally representative sample of adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1194–1214. doi:10.1177/0886260510368157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107–120. doi:10.1007/BF00978514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Coyne, S., & Gambone, L. (2005). A representative measure of psychological aggression and its severity. Violence and Victims, 20, 25–38. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.2005.20.1.25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foran, H. M., Slep, A. M., & Heyman, R. E. (2011). Prevalences of intimate partner violence in a representative Air Force sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 391–397. doi:10.1037/a0022962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H. (2005). Female violence against intimate partners: An introduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 229–237. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00217.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, L. C., & Werhun, C. D. (2011). “You’re such a girl!” The psychological drain of the gender role harassment of men. Sex Roles, 65, 13–22. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9948-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (1985). Men who batter: An integrated approach for stopping wife abuse. Holmes Beach: Learning Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grych, J. H., & Swan, S. C. (2012). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of interpersonal violence: Introduction to the special issue on interconnections among different types of violence. Psychology of Violence, 2, 105–110. doi:10.1037/a0027616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S. L. (1996). The Dominance Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties. Violence and Victims, 11(3), 199–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S. (2009). The gender debate in intimate partner violence: Solutions and deadends. Psychological Trauma, 1, 24–34. doi:10.1037/a0015066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S., & Grych, J. (Eds.). (2012). The web of violence: Exploring connections among different forms of interpersonal violence and abuse. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S., & Jackson, A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63, 324–331. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9816-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamby, S. L., & Sugarman, D. B. (1999). Acts of psychological aggression against a partner and their relation to physical assault and gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 959–970. doi:10.2307/354016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (1998). The violence of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence against women. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: A neglected area of research. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 75–85. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.2.2.75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical and sexual aggression among college students using the revised conflict tactics scale. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–213. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D. A., Brown, J., & Dunning, E. (2007). Characteristics of callers to the domestic abuse helpline for men. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 63–72. doi:10.1007/s10896-006-9052-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, P. (1984). Psychological abuse of women by spouses and live-in lovers. Women & Therapy, 3, 37–49. doi:10.1300/J015V03N01_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W., & McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 873–886. doi:10.2307/351344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypotheses. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jezl, D. R., Molidor, C. E., & Wright, T. L. (1996). Physical, sexual and psychological abuse in high school dating relationships: Prevalence rates and self-esteem issues. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 69–87. doi:10.1007/BF01876596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Davidson, W. S., Bogat, G. A., Levendosky, A., & von Eye, A. (2005). Validation of the subtle and overt psychological abuse scale: An examination of construct validity. Violence and Victims, 20, 407–416. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.20.4.407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karakurt, G., & Cumbie, T. (2012). The relationship between egalitarianism, dominance, and violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 115–122. doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9408-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., & Painter, S. L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 350–364. doi:10.1177/088626092007003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. W., Taft, C., King, L. A., Hammond, C., & Stone, E. R. (2006). Directionality of the association between social support and post‐traumatic stress disorder: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2980–2992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179–193. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, E., Yoon, J., Langer, A., & Ro, E. (2009). Is psychological aggression as detrimental as physical aggression? The independent effects of psychological aggression on depression and anxiety symptoms. Violence and Victims, 24, 20–37. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.24.1.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D. M. (2008). Attachment, interpersonal problems, and family of origin functioning: Differences between partner violent and nonpartner violent men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 90–105. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.2.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loring, M. T. (1994). Emotional abuse. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiuro, R. D. (2001). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will also hurt me: Psychological abuse in domestically violent relationships. In K. D. O’Leary & R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Psychological abuse in violent domestic relations (pp. ix–xx). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (1992a). Development of the severity of violence against women scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 103–121. doi:10.1007/BF00978700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (1992b). The severity of violence against men scales. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 189–203. doi:10.1007/BF00979027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (1994). Physical and psychological abuse. In W. R. C. B. H. Spitzberg (Ed.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 281–311). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. D. (1996). Psychological abuse of women: Six distinct clusters. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 379–409. doi:10.1007/BF02333424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matte, M., & Lafontaine, M.-F. (2011). Validation of a measure of psychological aggression in same-sex couples: Descriptive data on perpetration and victimization and their association with physical violence. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 7, 226–244. doi:10.1080/1550428X.2011.564944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 65, 13–22. doi:10.1007/BF01544277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C. (1993). Studying battered women and batterers: Feminist perspectives on methodology. In M. Hansen & M. Harway (Eds.), Battering and family therapy: A feminist perspective (pp. 54–68). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C. (2005). Understanding gender and intimate partner abuse: Theoretical and empirical approaches. Sex Roles, 52, 717–724. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4194-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Bartoszek, T. A. (2000). Intimate violence. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 115–144). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Cosgrove, L. (2004). Feminist research methods: Studying women and gender. In M. Paludi (Ed.), The Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 155–182). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Swiderski, C. (2010). From battered women to intimate partner violence: (Re) conceptualizing relationship violence. In M. Paludi & F. Denmark (Eds.), Victims of sexual assault and abuse: Resources and responses for individuals and families, volume II, cultural, community, educational and advocacy responses (pp. 241–277). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., Livingston, N. A., & Ford, A. (2005). A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 323–336. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00226.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., Livingston, N., & Frieze, I. H. (2008). Intimate partner violence: Perspectives on research and intervention. In F. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 555–589). Westport: Preager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, M., Weaver, T., & Resick, P. (2008). Mental health consequences of intimate partner abuse: A multidimensional assessment of four different forms of abuse. Violence Against Women, 14, 634–654. doi:10.1177/1077801208319283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L., & Simpson, S. S. (1991). Courtship violence and social control: Does gender matter? Law and Society Review, 25, 335–366. doi:10.2307/3053802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14, 39–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1989). Psychological aggression predicts physical aggression in early marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 579–582. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.57.5.579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, J., McNamara, J., & Ertl, M. (1999). Incidence and prevalence of dating partner abuse and its relationship to dating practices. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 125–137. doi:10.1177/088626099014002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hearn, R. E., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Women’s experience of giving and receiving emotional abuse: An attachment perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 375–391. doi:10.1177/088626097012003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Developmental and affective issues in assessing and treating partner aggression. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 400–414. doi:10.1093/clipsy/6.4.400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D. (2001). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. In K. D. O’Leary & D. Maiuro (Eds.), Psychological abuse in violent domestic relations (pp. 3–28). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Pre relationship and relationship effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 594–602. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P., & Thomas, C. D. (1992). Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a Canadian university sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 24, 490–501. doi:10.1037/h0078756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakowski, S. M., & McHugh, M. C. (2012, March). Perceptions of psychological abuse as a function of gender, intent and reactions. Poster presented at AWP, Palm Springs, CA.

  • Randle, A., & Graham, C. A. (2011). A review of the evidence on the effects of intimate partner violence on men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12, 97–111. doi:10.1037/a0021944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, B., & Bruschi, I. G. (1989). Psychological abuse among college women in dating relationships. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1283–1297. doi:10.2466/pms.1989.69.3f.1283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M., & Follingstad, D. (2011). Gender differences in reporting psychological abuse in a national sample. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 20, 471–502. doi:10.1080/10926771.2011.586573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romito, P., Turan, J. M., & De Marchi, M. (2005). The impact of current and past interpersonal violence on women’s mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1717–1727. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. M., & Babcock, J. C. (2009). Proactive and reactive violence among intimate partner violent men diagnosed with antisocial and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 607–617. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9259-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. M. (2012). Issues of reliability in measuring intimate partner violence during courtship. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0233-4.

  • Seelau, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (2005). Gender role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 363–371. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M. F., & Campbell, J. A. (1992). The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291–305. doi:10.1177/088626092007003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonelli, C. J., & Ingram, K. M. (1998). Psychological distress among men experiencing physical and emotional abuse in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 667–681. doi:10.1177/088626098013006001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, S. B., & Thomas, K. A. (2009). Views of intimate partner violence in same- and opposite- sex relationships. Journal of Marriage & Family, 71, 337–352. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00602.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2010). Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62, 201–211. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9717-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. (1990). Verbal and physical aggression in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 75–78. doi:10.2307/353043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intra-family conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88. doi:10.2307/351733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Family patterns and primary prevention of family violence. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 507–526). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1995). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 283–316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strube, M., & Barbour, L. S. (1984). Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 837–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D., & Hotaling, G. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3–30). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C.M., Parisian, J.A., Davidson, W. (1991, August). Index of spouse abuse: Development of a measure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.

  • Swiderski, C., & McHugh, M.C. (2011, March). Women’s psychological abuse of intimate male partners: (Re) conceptualization. Paper presented at AWP, Philadelphia.

  • Tanha, M., Beck, C., Figueredo, A. J., & Raghavan, C. (2010). Sex differences in intimate partner violence and the use of coercive control as a motivational factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1836–1854. doi:10.1177/0886260509354501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2005). Community based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53, 573–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In R. T. Ammerman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook (pp. 291–310). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (2001). The validation of psychological maltreatment of women inventory. In K. D. O’Leary & R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Psychological abuse in violent domestic relations (pp. 47–59). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetrate dominant violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997–1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2008). Gender, culture, and men’s intimate partner violence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 652–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence and Victims, 6, 247–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2002). World report on violence and health: Summary. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA

    Maureen C. McHugh & Catherine Swiderski

  2. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Samantha Rakowski

Authors
  1. Maureen C. McHugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samantha Rakowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catherine Swiderski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen C. McHugh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McHugh, M.C., Rakowski, S. & Swiderski, C. Men’s Experience of Psychological Abuse: Conceptualization and Measurement Issues. Sex Roles 69, 168–181 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0274-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0274-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation