Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using the Patient Generated Index to Evaluate Response Shift Post-stroke

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Individualized measures allow for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) based on areas that are relevant to the person and may prove to be useful for evaluating response shift (reconceptualization of HRQL and change in values). Objective: The objective of this study was to assess reconceptualization of HRQL and change of individual values among persons with stroke during the first six months of recovery. Methods: The data collection for this study was incorporated into a randomized trial of acute post-stroke care. Individualized HRQL was evaluated at 6 and 24 weeks post-stroke using the Patient Generated Index (PGI). At 24 weeks a semi-structured interview was administered to assess whether verbalizations given by subjects indicated that they had experienced a response shift. Results: Ninety two subjects (61%) had complete PGI information at the 6- and 24-week evaluations, and of these, 46 completed the semi-structured interview. Between the 6- and 24-week evaluations, the domains selected were: the same for 10 (11%) subjects, reduced for 27 (29%), expanded for 11 (12%), and completely different for 44 (48%) subjects. Twenty eight percent (n=13) of subjects recovering from stroke experienced a response shift as evidenced by the semi-structured interviews. Conclusion: The PGI provides valuable information regarding changes in person’s conceptualization of HRQL and values, but the feasibility of using an individualized measure during the first six months post-stroke is limited by the added complexity of completing and interpreting such a measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SA Shumaker MJ Naughton (2000) The international assessment of health-related quality of life: A theoretical perspective SA Shumaker RA Berzon (Eds) The International Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life Rapid Communications New York 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. MA Sprangers CE Schwartz (1999) ArticleTitleIntegrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model Soc Sci Med 48 IssueID11 1507–1515 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3 Occurrence Handle10400253 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzisFynsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JE, Ware SuffixJr (1992) ArticleTitleSherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 IssueID6 473–483 Occurrence Handle1593914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AM Damiano (1996) The Sickness Impact Profile B Spilker (Eds) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  5. CA O’Boyle H McGee A Hickey K O’Malley CR Joyce (1992) ArticleTitleIndividual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement Lancet 339 1088–1091 Occurrence Handle1349111 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3snisVY%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AM Hickey G Bury CA Oboyle F Bradley FD Okelly W Shannon (1996) ArticleTitleA new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV AIDS Br Med J 313 IssueID7048 29–33 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283otVGlug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S Smout PJ Koudstaal GM Ribbers WG Janssen J Passchier (2001) ArticleTitleStruck by stroke: A pilot study exploring quality of life and coping patterns in younger patients and spouses Int J Rehabil Res 24 IssueID4 261–268 Occurrence Handle11775030 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FkvVegsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NP Hurst P Kind D Ruta M Hunter A Stubbings (1997) ArticleTitleMeasuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D) Br. J. Rheumatol. 36 IssueID5 551–559 Occurrence Handle10.1093/rheumatology/36.5.551 Occurrence Handle9189057 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szjt1yqtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DA Ruta AM Garratt M Leng IT Russell LM MacDonald (1994) ArticleTitleA new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index Med Care 32 IssueID11 1109–1126 Occurrence Handle7967852 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FlslChtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. C Macduff E Russell (1998) ArticleTitleThe problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: Use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population Quality Life Res 7 IssueID8 761–769 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008831209706 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7pslKqtQ%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DA Ruta AM Garratt IT Russell (1999) ArticleTitlePatient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions Quality Health Care 8 IssueID1 22–29 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgslGmsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/qshc.8.1.22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PJ Dorman F Waddell J Slattery M Dennis P Sandercock (1997) ArticleTitleAre proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke 28 IssueID10 1883–1887 Occurrence Handle9341689 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FgtVyqtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P Dorman J Slattery B Farrell M Dennis P Sandercock (1998) ArticleTitleQualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial Stroke 29 IssueID1 63–68 Occurrence Handle9445330 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gs1Wjug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. AM Garratt J Klaber Moffett AJ Farrin (2001) ArticleTitleResponsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain Spine 26 IssueID1 71–77 Occurrence Handle11148649 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7js1WltQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. JE Ware SuffixJr KK Snow M Kosinski B Gandek (1993) Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  16. PJ Dorman F Waddell J Slattery M Dennis P Sandercock (1997) ArticleTitleIs the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke 28 IssueID10 1876–1882 Occurrence Handle9341688 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FgtVyqtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SL Wood-Dauphinee MA Opzoomer JI Williams B Marchand WO Spitzer (1988) ArticleTitleAssessment of global function: The reintegration to normal living index Arch Phys Med Rehab 69 IssueID8 583–590 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1czgvVKkuw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. PJ Clarke SE Black EM Badley JM Lawrence JI Williams (1999) ArticleTitleHandicap in stroke survivors Disability and Rehabilitation 21 IssueID3 116–123 Occurrence Handle10206351 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3itFWqsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. CV Granger LS Dewis NC Peters CC Sherwood JE Barrett (1979) ArticleTitleStroke rehabilitation: Analysis of repeated Barthel index measures Arch Phys Med Rehab 60 IssueID1 14–17 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE1M7itlamtA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. FI Mahoney DW Barthel (1965) ArticleTitleFunctional evaluation: The Barthel lndex Md St Med J 14 61–65 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FmtlCltA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. NM Salbach (2001) ArticleTitleResponsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke Arch Phys Med Rehab 82 1204–12 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrgvFektA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Salbach NM, Finch L, Wood-Dauphinee S. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): Validity and Responsiveness 1998; 83(7): 617–630.

  23. D Podsiadlo S Richardson (1991) ArticleTitleThe timed “Up & Go'': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons J Am Geriatr Soc 39 142–148 Occurrence Handle1991946 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M7itlKgsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T Colton (1974) Statistics in Medicine Little, Brown and Company Boston

    Google Scholar 

  25. MF Folstein SE Folstein PR McHugh (1975) ArticleTitle“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 12 IssueID3 189–198 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 Occurrence Handle1202204 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE28%2FntFKjtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. W Freidl R Schmidt WJ Stronegger A Irmler B Reinhart M Koch (1996) ArticleTitleMini mental state examination: Influence of␣sociodemographic, environmental and behavioral factors and vascular risk factors J Clin Epidemiol 49 73–78 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(95)00541-2 Occurrence Handle8598514 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287ntlCqsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. MP Tully JA Cantrill (2000) ArticleTitleThe validity of the modified patient generated index – a quantitative and qualitative approach Quality Life Res 9 IssueID5 509–520 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008949809931 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FpvFWntg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McArthur G. Assessing disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Unpublished BMed Sci dissertation University of Aberdeen: 1997.

  29. GS Howard PR Dailey (1979) ArticleTitleResponse-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures J Appl Psychol 64 144–150

    Google Scholar 

  30. K Thunedborg P Allerup P Bech CRB Joyce (1993) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the Repertory Grid for Measurement of Individual Quality-Of-Life in Clinical-Trials Int J Method Psych Res 3 IssueID1 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  31. S Ahmed NE Mayo S Wood-Dauphinee J Hanley R Cohen (2004) ArticleTitleThe Impact of Response shift influenced estimates of change in health-related quality of life post-stroke J Clin Epidemiol 57 IssueID6 561–570 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.003 Occurrence Handle15246124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, S., Mayo, N.E., Wood-Dauphinee, S. et al. Using the Patient Generated Index to Evaluate Response Shift Post-stroke. Qual Life Res 14, 2247–2257 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8118-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8118-4

Keywords

Navigation