Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing a questionnaire to measure the psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result and its subsequent management: the TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) trial

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the process of developing and testing a new questionnaire, Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM), including an assessment of its content validity and reliability. The questionnaire was developed within the context of Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears (TOMBOLA) to assess the psychosocial impact of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear result and the subsequent management. A literature search, focus groups and thorough pre-testing involving experts and patients resulted in a short (15-item), easily completed and understood questionnaire. Questions address issues including cancer, health, fertility and sexual concerns. Repeatability was assessed in 110 TOMBOLA recruits using weighted κ; all but one of the questions showed levels of reliability near to, or above, 0.5. Cronbach’s standardised α was 0.73, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Each POSM item was correlated with the anxiety and depression sub-scales of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). All except one of the questions correlated more highly with the total POSM score than with the HADS sub-scales thus indicating discriminant validity. The POSM will enable comparison of the alternative management policies for low-grade cervical smears in terms of the benefits (or otherwise) perceived by the women managed by these policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Review 2003 NHS cervical screening programme. Celebrating 15 years of achievement. NHS Cervical Screening Programme, 2003.

  2. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Colposcopy and programme management. Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. NHS Cervical Screening Programme, 2004.

  3. L Sharp (2002) ArticleTitleHow should women with an abnormal cervical smear be followed-up? Scott Cancer Therapy Network Newslett 35 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  4. C Lerman SM Miller R Scarborough P Hanjani S Nolte D. Smith (1991) ArticleTitleAdverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening Am J Obstet Gynecol 165 658–662 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6A28foslU%3D Occurrence Handle1892194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ED Paskett BK. Rimer (1995) ArticleTitlePsychosocial effects of abnormal Pap tests and mammograms: A review J Womens Health 4 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  6. IE Doherty PH Richardson CD Wolfe KS. Raju (1991) ArticleTitleThe assessment of the psychological effects of an abnormal cervical smear result and subsequent medical procedures J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 12 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Lamont (1994) ArticleTitlePsychosexual reactions of women to the diagnosis of conditions associated with pre-invasive cervical cancer Can J Hum Sex 3 181–183

    Google Scholar 

  8. CE Lerman BK. Rimer (1993) ArticleTitlePsychosocial impact of cancer screening Oncology 7 67–72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyB2cbosVM%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. TM Marteau P Walker J Giles M. Smail (1990) ArticleTitleAnxieties in women undergoing colposcopy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97 859–861 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2Mrgt1A%3D Occurrence Handle2242376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. TM Marteau J Kidd L. Cuddeford (1996) ArticleTitleReducing anxiety in women referred for colposcopy using an information booklet Br J Health Psychol 1 181–189

    Google Scholar 

  11. T Posner M. Vessey (1988) ArticleTitlePsychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95 729–732 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieA38nosF0%3D Occurrence Handle3415938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RA Roberts SM. Blunt (1994) ArticleTitleThe psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101 751–752 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3svlt10%3D Occurrence Handle7677811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. J Wardle A Pernet D. Stephens (1995) ArticleTitlePsychological consequences of positive results in cervical-cancer screening Psychol Health 10 185–194

    Google Scholar 

  14. H Zeisler K Mayerhofer EA Joura M Sator C. Kainz (1997) ArticleTitlePsychological burden of women with mild cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Oncol Rep 4 1063–1065

    Google Scholar 

  15. DH Gath N Hallam L Mynors-Wallis A Day SAK. Bond (1995) ArticleTitleEmotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic J Epidemiol Commun Health 49 79–83 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB383itVE%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S Bell M Porter H Kitchener C Fraser P Fisher E. Mann (1995) ArticleTitlePsychological response to cervical screening Prev Med 24 610–616 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC1MjlvVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8610085

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AS Zigmond RP. Snaith (1983) ArticleTitleThe hospital anxiety and depression scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 67 361–370 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyB2sbhtVw%3D Occurrence Handle6880820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A Bennetts L Irwig B Oldenburg et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePEAPS-Q: A questionnaire to measure the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal pap smear J Clin Epidemiol 1995 IssueID48 1235–1243

    Google Scholar 

  19. MJ Campion JR Brown DJ McCance et al. (1988) ArticleTitlePsychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95 175–181 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC28zkt10%3D Occurrence Handle2831933

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S Birch J Melnikow M. Kuppermann (2003) ArticleTitleConservative versus aggressive follow up of mildly abnormal Pap smears: Testing for process utility Health Econ 12 879–884 Occurrence Handle14508872

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Likert (1952) ArticleTitleA technique for the development of attitude scales Educ Psychol Meas 12 313–315

    Google Scholar 

  22. M Sprangers A Cull K Bjordal M Groenvold NK. Aaronson (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules Qual Life Res 2 287–295 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3srgsFY%3D Occurrence Handle8220363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol – A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  24. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows, Release 9.0.0. SPSS Inc, 1999.

  25. Stata Corp. STATA Statistical Software, Release 8.0. Stata Corp, 2003.

  26. P Fayers D. Machin (2000) Quality of Life. Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation Wiley Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  27. DL Streiner GR. Norman (2001) Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  28. S Williams J Weinman J Dale S. Newman (1996) ArticleTitleExpectations: A comparison between general practice patients with and without mood disorder Primary Care Psychiatry 2 229–235

    Google Scholar 

  29. J Cuzick P Sasieni P Davies et al. (1999) ArticleTitleA systematic review of the role of human papillomavirus testing within a cervical screening programme Health Technol Assess 3 IssueID14 i–iv Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzitVKjug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E Maissi TM Marteau M Hankins S Moss R Legood A. Gray (2004) ArticleTitlePsychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: Cross sectional questionnaire study Br Med J 328 1293–1298

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Statistics Online. People & Migration. Ethnicity, April 2001. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp? id=764

  32. RG Blanks M Waller A Sanchez-Galvez SM. Moss (1994) ArticleTitleMonitoring and evaluating the performance of the UK NHS Cervial Screening Programme: Monitoring performance by using cytology outcomes adjusted for population characteristics Cytopathology 15 5–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK

    N. M. Gray & S. C. Cotton

  2. University Nottingham, Nottingham

    M. Avis, Z. Philips & D. Whynes

  3. The Postgraduate Medical Institute, in association with Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Canada

    L. G. Walker

  4. Institute of Medical Social Care Research, University of Wales Bangor, Bangor

    I. Russell

  5. National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland

    L. Sharp

  6. Canada on behalf of the TOMBOLA group, University of Ottawa, Ontario

    J. Little

Authors
  1. N. M. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. C. Cotton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Avis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Z. Philips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. I. Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. G. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Whynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. Gray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, N.M., Sharp, L., Cotton, S.C. et al. Developing a questionnaire to measure the psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result and its subsequent management: the TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) trial. Qual Life Res 14, 1553–1562 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-8146-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-8146-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation