Abstract
Objective
We aimed to explore, using qualitative methods, the perspectives of patients with hypertension on issues relating to concordance in prescribing.
Method
This study took place in NHS general practices in Northern Ireland. A purposeful sample of patients who had been prescribed anti-hypertensive medication for at least one year were invited to participate in focus groups or semi-structured interviews; data were analysed using constant comparison.
Main outcome measures
The perspectives of patients with hypertension on issues relating to concordance in prescribing.
Results
Twenty-five individuals participated in five focus groups; two participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants felt they could make valuable contributions to consultations regarding their management. They were prepared to negotiate with GPs regarding their medication, but most deferred to their doctor’s advice, perceiving doctors’ attitudes and time constraints as barriers to their greater involvement in concordant decision-making. They had concerns about taking anti-hypertensive drugs, were aware of lifestyle influences on hypertension and reported using personal strategies to facilitate adherence and reduce the need to take medication.
Conclusions
Participants indicated a willingness to be␣involved in concordance in prescribing anti- hypertensive medication but needed health professionals to address their concerns and confusion about the nature of hypertension. These findings suggest that there is a need for doctors and other healthcare professionals with responsibility for prescribing to develop skills specifically to explore the beliefs and views underlying an individual’s medication use. Such skills may need to be developed through specific training programmes at both undergraduate and postgraduate level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Myers LB, Midence K. Concepts and issues in adherence. In: Myers LB, Midence K, editors. Adherence to treatment in medical conditions. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998
WHO Report. Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2003
Osterberg L, Blaschke R. Adherence to medication. New Engl J Med 2005; 353:487–497
Benson J, Britten N. Patients’ decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study. Br Med J 2002; 325:873–877
Horne R, Weinman J. Patients’ beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47:557–567
From Compliance to Concordance. Achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and Merck Sharp & Dohme; 1997
Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? Br Med J 1999; 319:780–782
Pollock K. ‘I’ve not asked him, you see, and he’s not said’: understanding lay explanatory models of illness is a prerequisite for concordant consultations. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9:105–117
Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Saljo R. Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication. Int J Cardiol 2000; 76:157–163
Dowell J, Jones A, Snadden D. Exploring medication use to seek concordance with non-adherent patients: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52:24–32
Elwyn G, Edwards A, Britten N. “Doing prescribing”: how doctors can be more effective. Br Med J 2003; 327:864–867
Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T et al. Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Br Med J 2002; 325:766–770S
The National Office for Summative Asssessment. www.nosa.org.uk/information/video/cogped.guidelines.htm. Accessed 4 September 2004
Miller NH. Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med 1997; 102(2A Supplement):43–49
Lisper L, Isacson D, Sjoden P-O, Bingefors K. Medicated hypertensive patients’ views and experience of information and communication concerning antihypertensive drugs. Pat Educ Couns 1997; 32:147–155
Lahdenpera TS, Kyngas HA. Levels of compliance shown by hypertensive patients and their attitude toward their illness. J Adv Nursing 2001; 34:189–195
Weiss MC, Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ. Decision analysis for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients: a qualitative investigation. Pat Educ Couns 2004; 53:197–203
Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50:829–840
Nair K, Dolovich L, Cassels A, McCormack J, Levine M, Gray J et al. What patients want to know about their medications: focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician 2000; 48:104–110
Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957
Stewart J, Brown K, Kendrick D, Dyas J. Understanding of␣blood pressure by people with type 2 diabetes: a primary␣care focus group study. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55:298–304
Gascon JJ, Sanchez-Ortuno M, LLor B, Skidmore D, Saturno PJ. Why hypertensive patients do not comply with the treatment. Results from a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2004; 21:125–130
Johnson MJ, Williams M, Marshall ES. Adherent and nonadherent medication-taking in elderly hypertensive patients. Clin Nursing Res 1999; 8:318–335
Fallsberg M. Reflections on medicines and medication: a qualitative analysis among people on long-term drug regimens. Linkoping Studies in Education. Dissertations 31; 1991
Townsend A, Hunt K, Wyke S. Managing multiple morbidity in mid-life: a qualitative study of attitudes to drug use. Br Med J 2003; 327:837–942
Lewis DK, Robinson J, Wilkinson E. Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians’ and lay people’s attitudes. Br Med J 2003; 327:841–847
Becker MH. The health belief model and sick role behaviour. Health Edu Monogr 1974; 2:409–419
Horne R, Weinman J. Predicting treatment adherence: an overview of theoretical models. In: Myers LB, Midence K, editors. Adherence to treatment in medical conditions. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998
Van Wissen K, Litchfield M, Maling T. Living with high blood pressure. J Adv Nursing 1998; 27:567–574
Ross S, Walker A, MacLeod MJ. Patient compliance in hypertension: role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs. J Human Hypertension 2004; 18:607–613
Conner M, Norman P. The role of social cognition in health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press
Jones G. Prescribing and taking medicines. Br Med J 2003; 327:819–820
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the patients who participated in the focus groups. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the practice managers and GPs who helped with the logistical aspects of the study. Carmel Hughes is supported by a National Primary Care Career Scientist Award from the Research and Development Office, Northern Ireland. The study was funded under a School of Pharmacy PhD studentship to Catherine Bane. Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bane, C., Hughes, C.M., Cupples, M.E. et al. The journey to concordance for patients with hypertension: a qualitative study in primary care. Pharm World Sci 29, 534–540 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9099-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9099-x