Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The journey to concordance for patients with hypertension: a qualitative study in primary care

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to explore, using qualitative methods, the perspectives of patients with hypertension on issues relating to concordance in prescribing.

Method

This study took place in NHS general practices in Northern Ireland. A purposeful sample of patients who had been prescribed anti-hypertensive medication for at least one year were invited to participate in focus groups or semi-structured interviews; data were analysed using constant comparison.

Main outcome measures

The perspectives of patients with hypertension on issues relating to concordance in prescribing.

Results

Twenty-five individuals participated in five focus groups; two participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants felt they could make valuable contributions to consultations regarding their management. They were prepared to negotiate with GPs regarding their medication, but most deferred to their doctor’s advice, perceiving doctors’ attitudes and time constraints as barriers to their greater involvement in concordant decision-making. They had concerns about taking anti-hypertensive drugs, were aware of lifestyle influences on hypertension and reported using personal strategies to facilitate adherence and reduce the need to take medication.

Conclusions

Participants indicated a willingness to be␣involved in concordance in prescribing anti- hypertensive medication but needed health professionals to address their concerns and confusion about the nature of hypertension. These findings suggest that there is a need for doctors and other healthcare professionals with responsibility for prescribing to develop skills specifically to explore the beliefs and views underlying an individual’s medication use. Such skills may need to be developed through specific training programmes at both undergraduate and postgraduate level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers LB, Midence K. Concepts and issues in adherence. In: Myers LB, Midence K, editors. Adherence to treatment in medical conditions. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998

  2. WHO Report. Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osterberg L, Blaschke R. Adherence to medication. New Engl J Med 2005; 353:487–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson J, Britten N. Patients’ decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study. Br Med J 2002; 325:873–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horne R, Weinman J. Patients’ beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47:557–567

    Google Scholar 

  6. From Compliance to Concordance. Achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and Merck Sharp & Dohme; 1997

  7. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? Br Med J 1999; 319:780–782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pollock K. ‘I’ve not asked him, you see, and he’s not said’: understanding lay explanatory models of illness is a prerequisite for concordant consultations. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  9. Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Saljo R. Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication. Int J Cardiol 2000; 76:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dowell J, Jones A, Snadden D. Exploring medication use to seek concordance with non-adherent patients: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2002; 52:24–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Britten N. “Doing prescribing”: how doctors can be more effective. Br Med J 2003; 327:864–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T et al. Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Br Med J 2002; 325:766–770S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The National Office for Summative Asssessment. www.nosa.org.uk/information/video/cogped.guidelines.htm. Accessed 4 September 2004

  14. Miller NH. Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med 1997; 102(2A Supplement):43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lisper L, Isacson D, Sjoden P-O, Bingefors K. Medicated hypertensive patients’ views and experience of information and communication concerning antihypertensive drugs. Pat Educ Couns 1997; 32:147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lahdenpera TS, Kyngas HA. Levels of compliance shown by hypertensive patients and their attitude toward their illness. J Adv Nursing 2001; 34:189–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiss MC, Montgomery AA, Fahey T, Peters TJ. Decision analysis for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients: a qualitative investigation. Pat Educ Couns 2004; 53:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50:829–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nair K, Dolovich L, Cassels A, McCormack J, Levine M, Gray J et al. What patients want to know about their medications: focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician 2000; 48:104–110

    Google Scholar 

  20. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart J, Brown K, Kendrick D, Dyas J. Understanding of␣blood pressure by people with type 2 diabetes: a primary␣care focus group study. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55:298–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gascon JJ, Sanchez-Ortuno M, LLor B, Skidmore D, Saturno PJ. Why hypertensive patients do not comply with the treatment. Results from a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2004; 21:125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson MJ, Williams M, Marshall ES. Adherent and nonadherent medication-taking in elderly hypertensive patients. Clin Nursing Res 1999; 8:318–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fallsberg M. Reflections on medicines and medication: a qualitative analysis among people on long-term drug regimens. Linkoping Studies in Education. Dissertations 31; 1991

  25. Townsend A, Hunt K, Wyke S. Managing multiple morbidity in mid-life: a qualitative study of attitudes to drug use. Br Med J 2003; 327:837–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis DK, Robinson J, Wilkinson E. Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians’ and lay people’s attitudes. Br Med J 2003; 327:841–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Becker MH. The health belief model and sick role behaviour. Health Edu Monogr 1974; 2:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  28. Horne R, Weinman J. Predicting treatment adherence: an overview of theoretical models. In: Myers LB, Midence K, editors. Adherence to treatment in medical conditions. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1998

  29. Van Wissen K, Litchfield M, Maling T. Living with high blood pressure. J Adv Nursing 1998; 27:567–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ross S, Walker A, MacLeod MJ. Patient compliance in hypertension: role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs. J Human Hypertension 2004; 18:607–613

    Google Scholar 

  31. Conner M, Norman P. The role of social cognition in health behaviours. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press

  32. Jones G. Prescribing and taking medicines. Br Med J 2003; 327:819–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the patients who participated in the focus groups. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the practice managers and GPs who helped with the logistical aspects of the study. Carmel Hughes is supported by a National Primary Care Career Scientist Award from the Research and Development Office, Northern Ireland. The study was funded under a School of Pharmacy PhD studentship to Catherine Bane. Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmel M. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bane, C., Hughes, C.M., Cupples, M.E. et al. The journey to concordance for patients with hypertension: a qualitative study in primary care. Pharm World Sci 29, 534–540 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9099-x

Keywords

Navigation