Abstract.
This paper responds to the Expert Patient initiative by questioning its over-reliance on instrumental forms of reasoning. It will be suggested that expertise of the patient suffering from chronic illness should not be exclusively seen in terms of a model of technical knowledge derived from the natural sciences, but should rather include an awareness of the hermeneutic skills that the patient needs in order to make sense of their illness and the impact that the illness has upon their sense of self-identity. By appealing to MacIntyre’s concepts of “virtue” and “practice”, as well as Frank’s notion of the “wounded story-teller”, it will be argued that chronic illness can be constituted as a practice, by building a culture of honest and courageous story-telling about the experience of chronic suffering. The building of such a practice will renew the cultural resources available to the patient, the physician and the rest of the community in understanding illness and patient-hood.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2001) The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century Department of Health London
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Health (2001) The Expert Patient Update Department of Health London
A.W. Frank (1995) The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics University of Chicago Press Chicago
E. Levinas (1988) ‘Useless Suffering’ R. Bernasconi D. Wood (Eds) The Provocation of Levinas Routledge London
A. MacIntyre (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory Duckworth London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edgar, A. The expert patient: Illness as practice. Med Health Care Philos 8, 165–171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-2277-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-2277-5