Abstract
In society, there is a growing need for graduates who possess competencies consistent with deep learning. This means that, amongst other competencies, graduates should be capable of dealing with the complexity of the tasks in which they will engage in professional situations. We tried to increase the depth of students’ learning by changing the format of a so-called assignment-based learning to a problem-based learning course. The goals of this research were to determine if students, firstly, perceived the redesigned course as being more challenging and, secondly, adjusted their learning strategies towards deeper learning. Participants were two groups of second-year International Business Studies students attending the International Business Strategy course in consecutive years. Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and their learning strategies were measured in both the original (n = 406 students) and the redesigned course (n = 312 students) using the Ramsden Course Experiences Questionnaire and the Biggs Study Processes Questionnaire. In contrast to our expectations, the results indicated that the students from the redesigned course showed a higher degree of surface learning and a lower level of deep learning than the students from the assignment-based learning course. Additionally, the students perceived the new learning environment to be less positive in terms of the clarity of its goals, the usefulness of the textbook and the workload. Improvement in terms of students’ perceptions of the learning environment and their learning strategies could be expected to be fostered by the implementation of a more advanced staff development program, focusing the curricular assessment system on problem-solving skills, supporting the students in the development of the skills necessary to cope with the demands of the redesigned course, and giving them more opportunities to experience this instructional approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACNielsen. (2000). Employer satisfaction with graduate skills: Research report, 99/7. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Albaili, M. A. (1995). An arabic version of the Study Process Questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports 77, 1083–1089.
Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 1, 52–81.
Biggs, J. (1987). The Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ): Manual. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal 6, 27–39.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. Evensen & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199–226). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Boyatzis, R. E., Stubbs, E. C., & Taylor, S. N. (2002). Learning cognitive and emotional intelligence competencies through graduate management education. Academy of Management Journal on Learning and Education 2, 150–162.
Business Higher Education Forum. (1995). Higher education and work readiness: The view from the corporation. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 1, 1–15.
Curry, L. (2000). Individual differences in cognitive style, learning style and instructional preference in medical education. In G. Norman, C. van der Vleuten, & D. Newble (Eds.), International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 263–276). London: Kluwer.
Dart, B. (1997). Adult learners’ metacognitive behaviour in higher education. In P. Sutherland (Ed.), Adult learning: A reader (pp. 30–43). London: Kogan Page.
De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science 5, 321–341.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 13, 533–568.
Dolmans, D. H., Gijselaers, W. H., Schmidt, H. G., & Van der Meer, S. B. (1993). Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68, 207–213.
Ellis, J., & Williams, D. (1995). International business strategy. London: Financial Times.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Evans, T., & Nation, D. (2000). Changing university teaching. London: Kogan Page.
Field, L. (2001). Employability skills required by Australian workplaces. Sydney, Australia: Field Learning.
Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol, PA: Technical and Educational Services.
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects. In F. Dochy, M. Segers, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 37–55). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Greening, T. (1998). Scaffolding for success in problem-based learning. Medical Education Online, 3, 4. Retrieved April 25, 2003, from http://www.med-ed-online.org
Griffin, R., & Pustay, M. (1999). International business, a managerial perspective (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Hmelo, C., & Evensen, D. (2000). Introduction, problem based learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions through multiple methods of enquiry. In D. Evenson & C. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Houlden, R., Collier, C., Frid, P., John, S., & Pross, H. (2001). Problems identified by tutors in a hybrid problem-based learning curriculum. Academic Medicine 1, 81.
Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Davies, H., McKay, J., & Stott, V. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the Study Process Questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 2, 141– 157.
Lockwood, F. (1992). Activities in self-instructional texts. East Brunswick, NJ: Nicols Publishing.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., Watkins, D., & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong. Learning and Instruction 1, 21–48.
Nuy, H. P. J. (1991). Interactions of study orientation and students appreciation of structure in their educational environment. Higher Education 22, 267–274.
Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (1999). Using online technologies to support problem-based learning: Learners’ responses and perceptions. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 1, 58–79.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London, Routledge.
Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (1997, December). Perceptions of academic leadership and the effectiveness of university teaching. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology 5, 31–38.
Savin-Baden, M. (1998, September). Equipping students for employment through problem-based learning: Realizing curricula change across the boundaries. Paper presented at “Managing Learning Innovation: The Challenges of the Changing Curriculum”, University of Lincolnshire and Humberside, UK.
Schmidt, H. (1989). The rationale behind problem-based learning. In H. Schmidt, M. de Vries, & J. Greep (Eds.), New directions for medical education (pp.105–111). New York: Springer Verlag.
Schmidt, H. (1993). Foundations of problem-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Medical Education 27, 422–432.
Schmidt, H. (1994). Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: Does lack of structure cause students to seek tutor guidance. Academic Medicine 69, 656–662.
Schmidt, H., Dolmans, D., Gijselaers, W., & Des Marchais, J. (1995). Theory-guided design of a rating scale for course evaluation in problem-based curricula. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 7, 82–91.
Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education 4, 453–472.
Scouller, K., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education 19, 267–279.
Segers, M., & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in problem-based learning: The value-added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education 26(3), 327– 343.
Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2003). Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Sivan, A., Wong Leung, R., Woon, C.-C., & Kember, D. (2000). An implementation of active learning and its effects on the quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International 7, 381–389.
Stinson, J., & Milter, R. (1996). Problem-based learning in business education: Curriculum design and implementation issues. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 33–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education 22, 251–266.
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research 3, 357–442.
Vermunt, J. (2003). Power of learning environments and the quality of student learning. In E. De Corte, L.Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Vermunt, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction 9, 257–280.
Vernon, D., & Blake, R. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine 68, 550–563.
Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 1, 33–53.
Zhang, L. (2000). University students’ learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs’s 3P Model. Journal of Psychology 134(1), 37–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nijhuis, J.F.H., Segers, M.S.R. & Gijselaers, W.H. Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies. Learning Environ Res 8, 67–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3