Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Well Do Return-to-work Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions Address the Multicausality of Work Disability?

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction The best-documented return-to-work rehabilitation programs concern workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD). For this clientele, a global perspective has been adopted which explains the multicausality of work disability. This perspective of work disability proposes that return-to-work interventions should address three central elements: individual psychological factors, work environmental factors and factors related to the involvement of the various stakeholders. Long-term work disability is no longer seen simply as the consequence of impairment, but rather as the result of interactions between the worker and main systems: the health care, work environment and financial compensation systems. Methods This paper presents a descriptive content analysis of return-to-work interventions delivered to workers with MSKD which consider this global perspective and which are found to be effective in systematic reviews of the literature. Results The review of programs designed for workers with MSKD showed that eleven programs address the individual clinical and psychological factors, work environmental factors and factors related to the involvement of the various stakeholders, but in different ways. Only two programs met the essential components identified by the literature. These essential components are: centralized coordination of the worker’s return to work, formal individual psychological and occupational interventions, workplace-based interventions, work accommodations, contact between the various stakeholders and interventions to foster concerted action. Conclusions Interventions which involve the work environment and concerted action by the various partners seem to require the most investment in terms of energy. The establishment of common principles and shared values regarding work rehabilitation as well as less divided mechanisms for action among the various partners should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corbiere M, Shen J. A systematic review of psychological return-to-work interventions for people with mental health problems and/or physical injuries. Can J Commun Mental Health. 2006;25(2):261–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franche RL, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hlobil H, et al. Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(4):249–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meijer EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MacEachen E, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waddell G, Burton K, Main CJ, editors. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work. A conceptual, scientific review. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited; 2003.

  7. Loisel P, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elders LA, van der Beek AJ, Burdorf A. Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders—a systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73(5):339–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Staal JB, et al. Return-to-work interventions for low back pain: a descriptive review of contents and concepts of working mechanisms. Sports Med. 2002;32(4):251–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Durand MJ, et al. Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnostic interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):191–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. St-Arnaud L, St-Jean M, Damasse J. Towards an enhanced understanding of factors involved in the return-to-work process of employees absent due to mental health problems. J Commun Mental Health. 2006;25(2):303–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feuerstein M. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. Long-term effects. J Occup Med. 1993;35(4):396–403.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haldorsen EM, et al. Is there a right treatment for a particular patient group? Comparison of ordinary treatment, light multidisciplinary treatment, and extensive multidisciplinary treatment for long-term sick-listed employees with musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2002;95(1–2):49–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haldorsen EM, et al. Multimodal cognitive behavioral treatment of patients sicklisted for musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27(1):16–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L, et al. A cognitive-behavioral return-to-work program: effects on pain patients with a history of long-term versus short-term sick leave. Pain. 2001;91(1–2):155–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nuttman-Shwartz O, Ginsburg R. Early rehabilitation program after workplace injuries. Employee Assist Quarterly. 2002;17(3):17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vendrig AA. Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain. J Behav Med. 1999;22(3):217–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Verbeek JH, van der Weide WE, van Dijk FJ. Early occupational health management of patients with back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2002;27(17):1844–51; discussion 1851.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burke SA, Harms-Constas CK, Aden PS. Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program. A multi-center, prospective study with a comparison group. Spine. 1994;19(17):1880–5; discussion 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindstrom I, et al. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther. 1992;72(4):279–90; discussion 291–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loisel P, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine. 1997;22(24):2911–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnetz BB, et al. Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(5):499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bendix AF, et al. Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Eur Spine J. 1995;4(3):148–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bendix AF, et al. Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized, prospective study. Cleve Clin J Med. 1996;63(1):62–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Skouen JS, et al. Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study. Spine. 2002;27(9): 901–9; discussion 909–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Franche RL, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zwerling C, et al. Design and conduct of occupational injury intervention studies: a review of evaluation strategies. Am J Ind Med. 1997;32(2):164–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Durand MJ, et al. Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: a descriptive review of content. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):123–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(10):817–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Briand C, et al. Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30(4–5):444–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible thanks to two postdoctoral grants awarded to the principal author of this article: one from the Réseau Provincial en Adaptation et Réadaptation (REPAR) in Quebec and the other from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Succursale Centre-Ville, C.P. 6128, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3C 3J7

    Catherine Briand

  2. Faculty de Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

    Marie-José Durand & Marc Corbière

  3. Faculty of Education, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada

    Louise St-Arnaud

Authors
  1. Catherine Briand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marie-José Durand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Louise St-Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc Corbière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Briand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briand, C., Durand, MJ., St-Arnaud, L. et al. How Well Do Return-to-work Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions Address the Multicausality of Work Disability?. J Occup Rehabil 18, 207–217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9128-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-008-9128-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation