Skip to main content
Log in

Work–Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions Among Scientists and Engineers Working in R&D

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study we evaluate competing models of the direct and indirect effects of work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW) on two turnover intentions relevant to scientists and engineers: (i) leaving R&D for non-R&D work within the same organization and (ii) leaving one’s organization for another one.

Design/methodology/approach

A cross-sectional design was used. Our sample consists of almost 500 scientists and engineers in dual-earner families and with dependent care responsibilities.

Findings

We find some support for the domain-specific predictors-to-outcomes model: FIW indirectly (but not directly) increases intentions to change organization through work dissatisfaction. Contrary to expectations from the stress management model we find neither direct nor indirect relationships between WIF and turnover intentions.

Implications

Our findings suggest that organizations that help employees manage the effects of FIW on work dissatisfaction may be able to reduce the turnover among their technical workforce.

Originality/value

The study examines an overlooked outcome of work-family conflict: turnover intentions. In addition, it provides much needed attention to the implications of workfamily conflict for scientists and engineers, who have received little attention in the work-family conflict literature despite longstanding efforts to understand the relationship between marriage, parenthood, and productivity in these fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Social support is also thought to function as buffer, by alleviating the effect of stress on stress outcomes. There are few empirical studies on the role of support as a buffer in the context of work–family conflict (Kowalski and Beauvais 1999) but the results so far appear not to support the buffer hypothesis (Frone et al. 1995; Haar 2004). In separate analyses of our data, we found no buffer effect of colleague support or supervisor support in the relationship between FIW and turnover intentions, nor did we find a buffer effect in the relationship between WIF and turnover intentions.

References

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278–308. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Luk, V., & Stone, R. (1998). Family-responsive variables and retention-relevant outcomes among employed parents. Human Relations, 51(1), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aycan, Z., & Eskin, M. (2005). Relative contributions of childcare, spousal support, and organizational support in reducing work–family conflict for men and women: The case of Turkey. Sex Roles, 53(7/8), 453–471. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7134-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. (1982). Resolving contradictions in technical careers or “What if I like being an engineer?”. Technology Review, 85(8), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170–180. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–40. doi:10.1086/222820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P. E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples’ work–family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995–1007. doi:10.2307/354019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Protas, D. (2003). The 2002 national study of changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2005). Impact of work–family interference on general well-being: A replication and extension. International Journal of Stress Management, 12(3), 203–221. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.12.3.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. E. (2002). Rankings of full-time occupations by earnings, 2000. Monthly labor review online. Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2002/03/ressum.htm [March, June 15, 2002].

  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56(2), 836–849. doi:10.2307/2096259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family construct. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., & Perrewe, P. L. (1999). The role of social support in the stressor-strain relationship: An examination of work–family conflict. Journal of Management, 25(4), 513–540. doi:10.1177/014920639902500403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Unemployment, job satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analytical test of the Muchinsky model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 374–381. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (1998). Women entrepreneurs: Why companies lose female talent and what they can do about it. New York, NY: Catalyst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1997). Nonwork influences on withdrawal cognitions: An empirical examination of an overlooked issue. Human Relations, 50(12), 1511–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Hudecek, N. (1993). Organizational commitment- turnover relationship across occupational groups A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Studies, 18(2), 188–205. doi:10.1177/1059601193182004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi:10.2307/2393553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American, 256(2), 119–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425–441. doi:10.1177/001872678403700601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryburgh, H. (1999). Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering–adapting to the culture. Gender & Society, 13(5), 664–682. doi:10.1177/089124399013005006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women’s science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. (1992). Constraints on excellence: structural and cultural barriers to the recognition and demonstration of achievement. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 239–258). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150. doi:10.1177/0306312705046630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Faver, C. (1985). Women, men, and publication productivity. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 537–549. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00243.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H., & Hanusa, B. H. (1984). Women scientists: Overcoming barriers. In M. W. Steinkamp & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 2, pp. 139–163). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R. (2000). Work–family conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The national comorbidity survey. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 888–895. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work–family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Barnes, G. M. (1996). Work–family conflict, gender, and health-related outcomes: A study of employed parents in two community samples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 57–69. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1995). Relationship of work and family stressors to psychological distress: The independent moderating influence of social support, mastery, active coping, and self-focused attention. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook. Washington: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997). Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 145–167. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, K., & Xie, Y. (1999). The intersection of immigration and gender: Labor force outcomes of immigrant women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 80(2), 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A., Cordeiro, B. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2005). A longitudinal and multi-source test of the work–family conflict and job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(3), 305–323. doi:10.1348/096317905X26769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work–family conflict and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 350–370. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 76–88. doi:10.2307/258214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1986). A work-nonwork interactive perspective of stress and its consequence. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(2), 37–60. doi:10.1300/J075v08n02_04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Collins, K. M. (2001). Career involvement and family involvement as moderators of relationships between work–family conflict and withdrawal from a profession. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 91–100. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.2.91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work–family conflict. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560–568. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haar, J. (2004). Work–Family conflict and turnover intention: Exploring the moderation effects of perceived work–family support. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33(1), 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (1972). A model of coping with role conflict: the role behavior of college educated women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 471–486. doi:10.2307/2393827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. J. (2003). work–family conflict and withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(3), 419–436. doi:10.1023/A:1022820609967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44, 513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). A structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross sectional and longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 350–366. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hom, P. W., & Kinicki, J. A. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 975–987. doi:10.2307/3069441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria, M., Kassicieh, S. K., & Silver, M. (1999). Career orientations and career success among research, and development and engineering professionals. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management JET-M, 16, 29–54. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00027-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Gerson, K. (1998). Who are the overworked Americans? Review of Social Economy, 56, 442–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, T. (1980). Stress and the professional engineer. In G. L. Cooper & J. Marshall (Eds.), White collar and professional stress (pp. 189–210). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., Von Glinow, M. A., & Schriesheim, J. (1977). Issues in the study of “professionals” in organizations: The case of scientists and engineers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 329–345. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90034-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmeyer, C., & Cohen, A. (1999). Different strategies for managing the work/non-work interface: A test for unique pathways to outcomes. Work and Stress, 13, 59–73. doi:10.1080/026783799296192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, K. B., & Beauvais, L. L. (1999, May 1999). The role of social support at the work–family interface: Development of a conceptual model. Paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Kunda, G. (1991). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvic, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20(1), 149–160. doi:10.1177/030631290020001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latack, J. C., & Havlovic, S. J. (1992). Coping with job stress: A conceptual evaluation framework for coping measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 479–508. doi:10.1002/job.4030130505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 123–133. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEwen, K. E., & Barling, J. (1994). Daily consequences of work interferences with family and family interferences with work. Work and Stress, 8, 244–254. doi:10.1080/02678379408259996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlwee, J. S., & Robinson, J. G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and the workplace culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiksins, P., & Whalley, P. (2002). Putting work in its place: A quiet revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1994). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monat, A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Stress and coping: An anthology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 234–257). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, M. (1995). Women changing science: Voices from a field in transition. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2000). Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science, engineering, and technology: Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A. (1991). Organizational behavior: where we’ve been, where we’re going. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 427–458. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). OECD science, technology, and industry scoreboard 2001—toward a knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orthner, D. K., & Pittman, J. F. (1986). Family contributions to work commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 573–581. doi:10.2307/352043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, S. (1982). Predicting turnover intentions and turnover behavior: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 111–121. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(82)90056-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(March), 2–21. doi:10.2307/2136319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, L. A. (1997). Finding time. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J.H., Staines, G.L., & Lang, L. (1980). Conflict between work and family. Monthly Labor Review, 103(3), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Available: http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm, [2006, June 5; 2005, September 1].

  • Preston, A. E. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. W., Frone, M. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1992). Work–non-work conflict and the perceived quality of life. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 155–168. doi:10.1002/job.4030130205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silicon valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Keith, P. M. (1996). Self-concept disconfirmation, psychological distress, and marital happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(1), 167–177. doi:10.2307/353385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1987). Threats to identity: Self-identification and social stress. In C. R. Snyder & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Clinical and social psychological perspectives (pp. 273–321). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Sekaran, U., & Hall, D. T. (1989). Asynchronism in dual-career and family linkages. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook on career theory (pp. 159–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1994). Talking about leaving: Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors. Boulder: Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investment and involvement as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), 143–150. doi:10.2307/2391824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shellenbarger, S. (1999, November 17, 1999). What job candidates really want to know: Will I have a life? Wall Street Journal, p. B1.

  • Sindermann, C. J. (1982). Winning the games scientists play. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D. A. (1984). Dual-career family stress and coping. In P. Voydanoff (Ed.), Work and family: Changing roles of men and women (pp. 261–271). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soat, D. M. (1996). Managing engineers and technical employees: How to attract, motivate, and retain excellent people. Boston: Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33(3), 111–129. doi:10.1177/001872678003300203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1984). Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field’s outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 627–666. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.003211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suran, J. J. (1990). A view from the other side. IEEE Spectrum, 27(9), 52–54. doi:10.1109/6.58458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. (2000). Doing engineering: The career attainment and mobility of Caucasian, Black and Asian-American engineers. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work–family conflict and strain: A control perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2002). Commitment shift during organizational upheaval: Physicians’ transitions from private practitioner to employee. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(3), 382–404. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma, R. (2000). Changing research cultures in the US. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(4), 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Nishiguchi, T. (2000). Knowledge creation: A source of value. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. E. (1997). Becker’s side-bet theory of commitment revisited: Is it time for a moratorium or a resurrection? Human Relations, 50(6), 727–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, M. J., & Cooper, W. H. (1989). Predicting exit, voice, neglect, and loyalty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 521–539. doi:10.2307/2393565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. K. (1998). Employment of scientists and engineers reaches 3.2 million in 1995 (NSF 98–325). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. S., Konrad, T. R., Scheckler, W. E., Pathman, D. E., Mark, L., McMurray, J., Gerrity, M., & Schwartz, M. (2000). The effects of job satisfaction and perceived stress on the physical and mental health and withdraw intentions of physicians. Paper presented at the the 50th Academy of Management Meeting, Toronto, Canada.

  • Yan, S.-L. (1999). The status of Asian American women scientists and engineers in the labor force. Race, Gender, & Class, 6(3), 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Center for Innovation Management Studies, formerly at Lehigh University, the Technology Management Research Center, at Rutgers University, and the Sloan Foundation for previous support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne Post.

Additional information

Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Post, C., DiTomaso, N., Farris, G.F. et al. Work–Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions Among Scientists and Engineers Working in R&D. J Bus Psychol 24, 19–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9089-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9089-1

Keywords

Navigation