Skip to main content
Log in

The gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk in Tromsø, Norway

  • LOCOMOTOR DISEASES
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim of this study is to estimate the gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute risks of non-vertebral and osteoporotic (included hip, distal forearm and proximal humerus) fractures in a large cohort of men and women. This is a population-based 10 years follow-up study of 26,891 subjects aged 25 years and older in Tromsø, Norway. All non-vertebral fractures were registered from 1995 throughout 2004 by computerized search in radiographic archives. Absolute risks were estimated by life-table method taking into account the competing risk of death. The absolute fracture risk at each year of age was estimated for the next 10 years (10-year risk) or up to the age of 90 years (lifetime risk). The estimated 10-year absolute risk of all non-vertebral fracture was higher in men than women before but not after the age of 45 years. The 10-year absolute risk for non-vertebral and osteoporotic fractures was over 10%, respectively, in men over 65 and 70 years and in women over 45 and 50 years of age. The 10-year absolute risks of hip fractures at the age of 65 and 80 years were 4.2 and 18.6% in men, and 9.0 and 24.0% in women, respectively. The risk estimates for distal forearm and proximal humerus fractures were under 5% in men and 13% in women. The estimated lifetime risks for all fracture locations were higher in women than men at all ages. At the age of 50 years, the risks were 38.1 and 24.8% in men and 67.4 and 55.0% in women for all non-vertebral and osteoporotic fractures, respectively. The estimated gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk were higher in Tromsø than in other populations. The high lifetime fracture risk reflects the increased burden of fractures in this cohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O’Dowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev. 1985;7:178–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Saarikoski S, Alhava E. Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(3):219–27. doi:10.1007/s001980050284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett-Connor E. The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med. 1995;98(Suppl 2A):S3–8. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(05)80037-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(8):1109–17. doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, Laet CD, et al. A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(7):527–36. doi:10.1007/s001980200069.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Klift M, de Laet CD, Pols HA. Assessment of fracture risk: who should be treated for osteoporosis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19(6):937–50. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2005.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World-Health-Organisation. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: WHO; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston CC Jr, Hui S. Absolute versus relative fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20((4):704. doi:10.1359/JBMR.041215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siminoski L, Frame H, Josse K, et al. Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom. 2007;10(2):120–3. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Díez-Pérez A, González-Macías J, Marín F, Abizanda M, Alvarez R, Gimeno A, et al. Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(5):629–39. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0297-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graeme T, Andrew M, Charles P, Allan GN, Ian MD, Richard LP, et al. The importance of calculating absolute rather than relative fracture risk. Bone. 2007;41(6):937–41. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis J, Rizzoli R. Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2008. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0779-8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hiligsmann M, Bruyère O, Ethgen O, Gathon H-J, Reginster J-Y. Lifetime absolute risk of hip and other osteoporotic fracture in Belgian women. Bone. 2008;43:991–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cummings SR, Black DM, Rubin SM. Lifetime risks of hip, Colles’, or vertebral fracture and coronary heart disease among white postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2445–8. doi:10.1001/archinte.149.11.2445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, et al. Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(8):669–74. doi:10.1007/s001980070064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517–22. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00614-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooley H, Jones GA. Population-based study of fracture incidence in Southern Tasmania: lifetime fracture risk and evidence for geographic variations within the same Country. Osteoporos Int. 2001;V12(2):124–30. doi:10.1007/s001980170144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrett JA, Baron JA, Karagas MR, Beach ML. Fracture risk in the US medicare population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(3):243–9. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00167-X.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(6):781–8. doi:10.1359/jbmr.070315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK. International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(7):1237–44. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(Suppl 2):S3–7. doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joakimsen RM, Fonnebo V, Sogaard AJ, Tollan A, Stormer J, Magnus JH. The Tromso study: registration of fractures, how good are self-reports, a computerized radiographic register and a discharge register? Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(12):1001–5. doi:10.1007/s001980170008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC, Flanders WD, Timmel MJ, Tong T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(11):892–7. doi:10.1093/jnci/85.11.892. See comment.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schouten LJ, Straatman H, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Cancer incidence: life table risk versus cumulative risk. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994;48(6):596–600. doi:10.1136/jech.48.6.596.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Statistics Norway. Population statistics. 2006.

  26. Lofthus CM, Osnes EK, Falch JA, Kaastad TS, Kristiansen IS, Nordsletten L, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Oslo, Norway. Bone. 2001;29(5):413–8. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00603-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Finsen V, Johnsen LG, Trano G, Hansen B, Sneve KS. Hip fracture incidence in central norway: a followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;419:173–8. doi:10.1097/00003086-200402000-00028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R. The changing picture of hip fractures: dramatic change in age distribution and no change in age-adjusted incidence within 10 years in Central Finland. Bone. 1999;24(3):257–9. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00182-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults—the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80B(2):243–8. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.7762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders KM, Seeman E, Ugoni AM, Pasco JA, Martin TJ, Skoric B, et al. Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(3):240–7. doi:10.1007/s001980050222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oden A, Dawson A, Dere W, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Kanis JA. Lifetime risk of hip fractures is underestimated. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(6):599–603. doi:10.1007/s001980050105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadephia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;41(11):1226–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ahmed LA, Schirmer H, Fønnebø V, Joakimsen RM, Berntsen GK. Validation of the cummings’ risk score; how well does it identify women with high risk of hip fracture: the Tromsø Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(11):815–22. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9072-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A. Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. Bone. 2000;27(5):585–90. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00381-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McClung. Do current management strategies and guidelines adequately address fracture risk? Bone. 2006;38(2):13–7. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Deal CL. Absolute fracture risk. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007;9(1):66–70. doi:10.1007/s11926-007-0024-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mosca L. Absolute risk assessment in the clinical setting. Am J Med. 1999;107(2A):7S–9S. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00135-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Joakimsen RM. Risk factors for non-vertebral fractures in middle-aged population (thesis). Tromsø: University of Tromsø; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was financed by The Centre for Research in the Elderly in Tromsø, the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luai A. Ahmed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, L.A., Schirmer, H., Bjørnerem, Å. et al. The gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk in Tromsø, Norway. Eur J Epidemiol 24, 441–448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9353-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9353-8

Keywords

Navigation