Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women younger than age 40

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective Evidence-based recommendations for routine breast cancer screening suggest that women begin mammography at age 40, although some women receive a mammogram before that age. Little is known about mammography use among younger women, especially with respect to race and ethnicity. Methods We used data from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey to examine racial/ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women ages 30–39. We examined descriptive characteristics of women who reported ever having a mammogram, and used logistic regression to estimate associations between race/ethnicity and mammography use among women at average risk for breast cancer. Results Our sample comprised 3,098 women (18% Hispanic, 13% non-Hispanic [NH] black, 69% NH white), of whom 29% reported having ever had a mammogram. NH black women were more likely than NH white women to report ever having a mammogram and receiving multiple mammograms before age 40 among women of average risk. Patterns of mammography use for Hispanic women compared to NH white women varied. Conclusion Findings suggest differential utilization of mammograms by race/ethnicity among women outside current recommendations and of average risk. Future studies should examine the role of practice patterns and patient–provider communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2006) United States cancer statistics: 2003 incidence and mortality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/npcrpdfs/US_Cancer_Statistics_2003_Incidence_and_Mortality.pdf. Cited 15 May 2007

  2. Yankaskas BC (2005) Epidemiology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Dis 23:3–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E et al (2006) Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:168–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amend K, Hicks D, Ambrosone CB (2006) Breast cancer in African-American women: differences in tumor biology from European-American women. Cancer Res 66:8327–8330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. del Carmen MG, Hughes KS, Halpern E et al (2003) Racial differences in mammographic breast density. Cancer 98:590–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD et al (2005) Screening for breast cancer. JAMA 293:1245–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348:1672–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Cancer Society (2007) Chronological history of ACS recommendations on early detection of cancer. American Cancer Society, Inc. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ped/content/ped_2_3x_chronological_history_of_acs_recommendations_on_early_detection_of_cancer.asp?sitearea=ped. Cited 15 May 2007

  9. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:344–346

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer facts & figures, 2007. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Cancer Society (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. American Cancer Society, Inc. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_Guidelines_36.asp. Cited 15 May 2007

  12. Burke W, Daly M, Garber J et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 277:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell JB (2002) Breast cancer-race, ethnicity, and survival: a literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 74:187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Cancer Society (2005) Breast cancer facts and figures 2005–2006. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemon SC, Zapka JG, Clemow L et al (2006) Mammography screening after breast cancer diagnosis in a first degree female relative: age group differences (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:1053–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scharpf TP, Rimm AA (2006) Mammography utilization rates among young white and black women in the USA. Public Health 120:937–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM et al (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Center for Health Statistics (2006) Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2005 (machine readable data file and documentation). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R et al (2005) Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 143:362–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2005) Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 143:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Center for Health Statistics (2007) 2005 Imputed family income/personal earnings files. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/2005imputedincome.htm. Cited 15 May 2007

  22. Sabatino SA, Burns RB, Davis RB et al (2004) Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma: results from a national survey. Cancer 100:2338–2346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gross CP, Filardo G, Singh HS et al (2006) The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey. J Gen Intern Med 21:158–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001) Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 358:1389–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Benjamins MR, Kirby JB, Bond Huie SA (2004) County characteristics and racial and ethnic disparities in the use of preventive services. Prev Med 39:704–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramirez AG, Suarez L, Laufman L et al (2000) Hispanic women’s breast and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. Am J Health Promot 14:292–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF et al (1991) Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 7:69–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yabroff KR, Breen N, Vernon SW et al (2004) What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:723–732

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kerner JF, Yedidia M, Padgett D et al (2003) Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women. Prev Med 37:92–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L (2003) Mammography screening in African American women: evaluating the research. Cancer 97:258–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karliner LS, Patricia KC, Juarbe T et al (2005) Poor patient comprehension of abnormal mammography results. J Gen Intern Med 20:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bernard VB, Major AC, Ryerson AB (2005) National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: 1991–2002 national report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fox SA, Stein JA (1991) The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care 29:1065–1082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hawley ST, Earp JA, O’Malley M et al (2000) The role of physician recommendation in women’s mammography use: is it a 2-stage process? Med Care 38:392–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ (2003) Patient-provider communication in cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 18:402–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Malley MS, Earp JA, Hawley ST et al (2001) The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening? Am J Public Health 91:49–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bobo JK, Shapiro JA, Schulman J et al (2004) On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:620–630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Peipins LA, Shapiro JA, Bobo JK et al (2006) Impact of women’s experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:439–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Champion VL, Menon U, McQuillen DH et al (1998) Validity of self-reported mammography in low-income African-American women. Am J Prev Med 14:111–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI (1993) Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:566–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The findings, interpretations, and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie M. Kapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapp, J.M., Ryerson, A.B., Coughlin, S.S. et al. Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women younger than age 40. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113, 327–337 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9919-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9919-2

Keywords

Navigation