Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: a new gold standard for arm volume measurements

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

No consensus exists with respect to a commonly accepted and standardized method for measuring arm volumes in patients with lymphedema. Knowing the exact volume in (potential) lymphedemic arms and comparing this volume with healthy arms is important to detect the first signs of lymphedema and to study the effects of treatment.

Methods

A new apparatus, based upon the principle of measuring shortness of water, was developed to measure arm volumes. This measuring-method, inverse water volumetry, was prospectively validated in patients, suffering from lymphedema after complete or partial mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Healthy and lymphedemic arm were measured 3 times: twice by nurse A (A1 and A2) and once by nurse B (B). Subsequently, these differences in volumes were compared with differences in volumes obtained by the Herpertz method, which is based upon circumferential measurement.

Results

In every patient at every occasion volume of the lymphedemic arm was bigger than the corresponding volume of the control arm. Mean volumes of healthy arms were 3958(A1), 3966(A2) and 3961(B) ml respectively. Mean volumes of lymphedemic arms were 4721(A1), 4752(A2) and 4773(B) ml respectively, volume B being significantly different from volume A1. Volume difference of edemic arms minus control arms was not significant between measurements (A1 vs. A2 and A1 vs. B, respectively), while this difference was significant (A1 vs. B) using the Herpertz method.

Conclusion

Inverse water volumetry is an easy measuring device with a high inter- and intra-observer agreement. The small but significant volume increase of lymphedemic arms in time compared to the constant volumes of control arms is as well indicative for the accuracy of the method as for the volume of lymphedemic arms to increase when no therapeutic garment is carried.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Kissin MW, Querci della Rovere G, Easton D, Westbury G (1986) Risk of lymphedema following treatment of breastcancer. Br J Surg 73:580–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schunemann H, Willich N (1997) Lymphedema after breastcancer. A study of 5868 casus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 122(17):536–541

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiel KD, Rademacker AW (1996) Early stage breastcancer: edema after wide excicion and breast radiation. Radiology 198:279–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liljegren G, Holmberg L (1997) Arm mobility after sector resection and axillary dissection with and without postoperative radiotherapy in breastcancer stage I. Results from a randomised trial. Uppsala Orebro Breast Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer 33:193–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornish HB, Bunce IH, Ward LC, et al (1996) Bio-electrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphedema treatment programmes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38:169–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schunemann H, Willich N (1998) Lymphedema of the arm after primary treatment of breast cancer. Anticancer Res 18:2235–2236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramos SM, Oȁ9Donell LS, Knight G (1999) Edema volume, not timing, is the ley to success in lymphedema treatment. Am J Surg 178:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mortimer PS, Bates DO, Brassington HD, Stanton AWB, et al (1996) The prevalence of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer. Q J Med 89:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LR (1986) Arm edema in patients treated conservatively for breast cancer: relationship to patient age and axillary node dissection technique. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12:2079–2083

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewar JA, Sarrazin D, Benhamou et al (1987) Management of the axilla in concervatively treated breast cancer. 592 patients treated at Institut Gustave-Roussy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:475–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Larson D, Weinstein M, Goldberg I, et al (1986) Edema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage I–II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12:1575–1582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sitzia J (1995) Volume measurement in lymphedema treatment: examination of formulae. Eur J Cancer Care 4:11–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhnke E (1976) Volumbestimmung aus Umfangmessungen. Folia Angiologica 24:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lennihan R, Mackereth M (1973) Calculating volume changes in a swollen extremity from surface measurements. Am J Surg 126:649–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown J (2004) A clinically useful method for evaluating lymphedema. Clin J Oncol Nurs 8(1):35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Göltner E, Fishbach JU, Mönter B, Kraus A, Vorherr H (1985) Objektivierung des Lymphödems nach Mastektomie. Deutsche Med Wochenschrift 110:949–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cornish BH, Bunce IH, Ward LC, Jones LC, Thomas BJ (1996) Bioelectrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphedema treatment programmes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38:169–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brismar B, Ljungdahl I (1982) Postoperative lymfoedema after treatment of breast cancer. Acta Chir Scand 149:687–689

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farncombe M, Daniels G, Cross L (1994) Lymphedema: the seemingly forgotten complication. J Pain Sympt Manage 9:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryttov N, Holm V, Qvist N, Blichert-Toft M (1988) Influence of adjuvant irradiation on the development of late arm mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast. Acta Oncologica 27:667–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin PP, Allison DC, Wainstock J, et al (1993) Impact of axillary lymph node dissection on the therapy of breastcancer patients. J Clin Oncol 11:1136–1144

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herpertz U (1994) Messung und Dokumentation von Ödemen. Lymphologie 18:24–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Meijer RS, Rietman JS, Geertzen JH, Bosmans JC, Dijkstra PU (2004) Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema. Lymphology 37(3):127–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaulesar DMKS, den Hoed PT, Johannes EJ, van Dolder R, Benda E (1993) Direct and indirect methods for quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volume try, the disk model and the frustum sign model, using correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement. J Biomed Eng 15:477–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stranden E (1981) A comparison between surface measurements and water displacement volumetry for the quantification of leg edema. J Oslo City Hosp. 31:153–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mortimer PS (1990) Investigation and management of lymphedema. Vasc Med Rev. 1:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Segerstrom K, Bjerle P, Graffman S, Nystrom A (1992) Factors that influence incidence of brachial edema after treatment of breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 26:223–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kettle JH, Ruindle FF, Oddie TH (1958) Measurement of upper limb volumes: a clinical method. Aust NZ J Surg 27:263–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Veraart JCJM, Movig I, Asselman AH, Neumann HAM (1995) The volometer and the perometer; a clinical comparison. Scripta Phlebologica 5:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  30. Armer JM, Stwewart BR (2006) A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a Post-Breast cancer polulation. Lymph Res Biol 3(4):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sang C, McKinzie DC (2001) Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(12):1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L (1993) Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery of breast cancer. Can J Surg 36:315–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Velanovich V, Szymanski W (1999) Quality of life of breast cancer patients with lymphedema. Am J Surg 177:184–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ganz PA (1999) The quality of life after breast cancer-solving the problem of lymphedema. New Eng J Med 5(340):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pain SJ (2000) Purushotham. Lymphedema following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg 87:1128–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Phlebology and Lymphology, Hospital Nij Smellinghe, Compagnonsplein 1, 9202, NN Drachten, The Netherlands

    Robert J. Damstra

  2. Medical Department GlaxoSmithKline, Zeist, The Netherlands

    Eltjo J. Glazenburg

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Wim C. J. Hop

Authors
  1. Robert J. Damstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eltjo J. Glazenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wim C. J. Hop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Damstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damstra, R.J., Glazenburg, E.J. & Hop, W.C.J. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: a new gold standard for arm volume measurements. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99, 267–273 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9213-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation