Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the economic burden of diseases imputable to stress at work

The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the costs of work-related stress in France. Three illnesses—cardiovascular diseases, depression, musculoskeletal diseases and back pain—that may result from exposure to stress are identified and the proportions of cases attributable to the risk factor are calculated from epidemiological studies. Two methodological hypotheses allow us to provide complementary evaluations of the social cost of occupational stress and raise the ethical questions inherent in the choice of methodology. For the year 2000 our model shows that of a working population of 23.53 million in France some 310,000–393,400 persons (1.3–1.7%) were affected by illnesses attributable to work-related stress, and that 2,300–3,600 persons died as a result of their illness. Work-related stress costs society between €1,167 million and €1,975 million in France, or 14.4–24.2% of the total spending of social security occupational illnesses and work injuries branch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Behrens C, Henke KD (1988) Cost of illness studies: no aid to decision making? Reply to Shiell et al. Health Policy 10:137–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. CNAMTS/DRP (2002) Statistiques financières et technologiques des accidents du travail. Paris

  3. Cooper CL (1985) Organisation du travail et stress d’origine professionnelle. In: Automatisation, organisation du travail et stress d’origine professionnelle. BIT: Genève

  4. Cour des Comptes (2002) La gestion du risque accidents du travail et maladies professionnelle. February

  5. Dhondt S (1998) Time constraints and autonomy at work in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drummond M (1992) Cost-of-Illness studies. A major headache? Pharmacoeconomics 2:1–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddard G, Torrance G (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Everson SA, Siobhan CM, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA (2002) Epidemiologic evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes. J Psychosom Res 53:891–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gollac M, Volkoff S (2000) Les conditions de travail. La Découverte, Repères: Paris

  10. Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER (1993) The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry 54:405–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgson TA (1989) Cost of illness studies: no aid to decision making? Comments on the second opinion by Shiell et al. Health Policy 11:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoogendoorn W, Poppel MV, Bongers P, Koes B, Bouter L (2000) Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 25:2114–2125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Imbernon E (2003) Estimation du nombre de cas de certains cancers attribuables à des facteurs professionnels en France. Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Département Santé-Travail

  14. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Publique (INSERM) (2002) Statistiques des causes médicales de décès. INSERM: Paris

  15. Karasek R (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Sci Q 24:285–308

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karasek R, Theorell L (1990) Health work stress, productivity and reconstruction of working life. Wiley: New-York

  17. Kind P, Sorensen J (1993) The costs of depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 7:191–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koopmanschap MA, Van Ineveld BM (1992) Towards a new approach for estimating indirect costs of disease. Soc Sci Med 34:1005–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopp P, Fenoglio P (2002) Social cost of drugs in France. Eur Addict Res December

  20. Kortt MA, Langley PC, Cox ER (1998) A review of cost-of-illness studies on obesity. Clin Ther 20:772–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Le-Pape A, Lecomte T (1996) Aspects socio-économiques de la dépression—Evolution 1980–81/1991–92. CREDES: Paris

  22. Le-Pape A, Lecomte T (1999) Prévalence et prise en charge de la dépression—France 1996–1997. CREDES: Paris

  23. Le-Pen C, Lévy P (1995) Le cot des maladies cardiovasculaires. In: Gangjbakhch I, Ollivier J, Pavie A (eds) Maladie coronaire, approches stratégiques et thérapeutiques. Blackwell: Paris

  24. Letouzey J-P, Genet A, Amoretti R (1996) Cardiologie 2000: Livre Blanc sur la prise en charge des maladies cardiovasculaires en France. Sanesco: Paris

  25. Levi L, Lunde-Jensen P (1996) A model for assessing the costs of stressors at national level, socio-economic costs of work stress in two EU member states. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: Dublin p. 82

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mark TL, Woody GE, Juday T, Kleber HD (2001) The economic costs of heroin addiction in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend 61:195–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meltzer D (1997) Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 16:33–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mireux D (2002) Harmonisation des données de la protection sociale et prévention des troubles musculo-squelettiques en Europe. Rev Med Assurance Maladie 33:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  29. Niedhammer I, Goldberg M, Leclerc A, David S, Bugel I (1998) Psychosocial factors at work and subsequent depressive symptoms in the gazel cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health 24:197–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Paoli P, Merllie D (2001) Third European survey on working conditions 2000. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  31. Patten SB (2003) International differences in major depression prevalence: what do they mean? J Clin Epidemiol 56:711–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramaciotti D, Perriard J (2001) Les cots du stress en Suisse. Groupe de Psychologie Appliquée de l’université de Neuchâtel & ERGOrama: Genève

  33. Schnall PL, Belkic KL, Landsbergis PA, Baker DB (2000) The workplace and cardiovascular disease. Occup Med 15:324

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shiell A, Gerard K, Donaldson C (1987) Cost of illness studies: no aid to decision making? Health Policy 8:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stoudemire A, Frank R, Hedemark N (1986) The economic burden of depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 8:387–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tollefson G, Souetre E, Thomander L, Potvin J (1993) Comorbid anxious signs ans symptoms in major depression: impact on functional work capacity and comparative treatment outcomes. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 8:281–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out under the aegis of the Economics and Management Laboratory (ex-LATEC, UMR CNRS 5118). It is largely based on postgraduate research by Nathalie Wolff at the University of Burgundy. Very valuable help was provided by S. Dhondt (TNO, The Netherlands), E. Lavaud (CNAMTS Information Department, France), L. Levi and P. Lunde-Jensen, Claude Le Pen (LEGOS, University Paris 9, France), and P. Mossé (LEST, CNRS, France). We express our gratitude to them for their advice and assistance in collecting data. We also thank anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The shortcomings of this study are ours alone.

Conflict of interest:

No information supplied

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hélène Sultan-Taïeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Béjean, S., Sultan-Taïeb, H. Modeling the economic burden of diseases imputable to stress at work. Eur J Health Econ 6, 16–23 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0251-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0251-4

Keywords

Navigation