Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of GFR equations in Japanese subjects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Japanese GFR equations based on serum creatinine (Scr) (Eqcr), serum cystatin C (Scys) (Eqcys) and average value of Eqcr and Eqcys (Eqaverage), and coefficient-modified CKD-EPI equations based on Scr (CKD-EPIcr), Scys (CKD-EPIcys) and Scys in combination with Scr (CKD-EPIcr-cys) are now available for Japanese subjects. Performance of these equations has not been well evaluated in subjects stratified by GFR. Therefore, the bias, precision and accuracy of the GFR equations were compared in Japanese subjects stratified by measured GFR.

Methods

Three hundred fifty Japanese subjects were included for validation. These subjects were stratified by measured GFR (0–29, 30–59, 60–89, 90–119 ml/min/1.73 m2 and total). Japanese equations (Eqcr, Eqcys and Eqaverage) were compared with coefficient-modified CKD-EPI equations (0.813 × CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys and 0.908 × CKD-EPIcr-cys), respectively. GFR was measured by inulin renal clearance. Standardized Scr was measured by enzymatic method. Standardized Scys was measured by colloidal gold immunoassay.

Results

Bias and accuracy were not significantly different between Japanese GFR equations and coefficient-modified CKD-EPI equations in all mGFR ranges.

The precision of Eqcr was significantly better in GFR 0–29 ml/min/1.73 m2 and significantly worse in GFR 60–89 and GFR 90–119 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared with 0.813 × CKD-EPIcr. The precision of Eqcys was significantly better in GFR 30–59 and GFR 60–89 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared with CKD-EPIcys. The precision of Eqaverage was significantly better in GFR 30–59 ml/min/1.73 m2 and significantly worse in GFR 90–119 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared with 0.908 × CKD-EPIcr-cys.

Conclusion

Japanese GFR equations performed well in subjects with GFR under 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared with the coefficient-modified CKD-EPI equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2473–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Tomino Y, Yokoyama H, Hishida A. Revised equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. GFR estimation using standardized serum cystatin C in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.007.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Levey AS. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Modification of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for Japanese: accuracy and use for population estimates. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Performance of serum cystatin C versus serum creatinine as a marker of glomerular filtration rate as measured by inulin renal clearance. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011;15:868–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horio M, Yasuda Y, Kaimori J, Ichimaru N, Isaka Y, Takahara S, Nishi S, Uchida K, Takeda A, Hattori R, Kitada H, Tsuruya K, Imai E, Takahashi K, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Performance of the Japanese GFR equation in potential kidney donors. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2012;16:415–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murata K, Baumann NA, Saenger AK, Larson TS, Rule AD, Lieske JC. Relative performance of the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate among patients with varied clinical presentations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1963–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tangri N, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Greene T, Coresh J, Levey AS. Changes in dietary protein intake has no effect on serum cystatin C levels independent of the glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 2011;79:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the grant from the Japanese Society of Nephrology and Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.

Conflict of interest

All the authors have declared no competing interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Horio.

About this article

Cite this article

Horio, M., Imai, E., Yasuda, Y. et al. Performance of GFR equations in Japanese subjects. Clin Exp Nephrol 17, 352–358 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-012-0704-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-012-0704-5

Keywords

Navigation