Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 25 and 80 % of patients undergoing a low or very low anterior resection will suffer postoperatively, from a constellation of symptoms including fecal urgency, frequent bowel movements, bowel fragmentation and incontinence, collectively referred to as the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The etiology of LARS is multifactorial with the potential of sphincter injury during anastomosis construction, alterations in anorectal physiology, the development of a pudendal neuropathy, and a lumbar plexopathy with exacerbation of symptoms if there is associated anastomotic sepsis or the use of adjuvant and neoadjuavnt therapies. The symptoms of LARS may be obviated in part by the construction of a neorectal reservoir which may take the form of a colonic J-pouch, a transverse coloplasty, or a side-to-end anastomosis. This review outlines the factors contributing to LARS symptomatology along with the short- and medium-term functional results of comparative trials with the different types of neorectal reconstructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Facts & Figures 2007, p 10. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007PWSecured.pdf

  2. Dixon CF (1948) Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann Surg 128:425–442. Reprinted as classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Claude F. Dixon 1893–1968. Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984; 27:419–429

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirwan WO, O’Riordain M, Waldron R (1989) Declining indications for abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 76:1061–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ravitch MM (1984) Varieties of stapled anastomoses in rectal resection. Surg Clin N Am 64:543–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation. Norman Nigro lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider PM, Vallbohmer D, Ploenes Y et al (2011) Evaluation of quality indicators following implementation of total mesorectal excision in primarily resected rectal cancer changed future management. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:903–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salerno G, Daniels IR, Moran BJ, Wotherspoon A, Brown G (2006) Clarifying margins in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer: the MERCURY experience. Clin Radiol 61:916–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohiuddin M, Winter K, Mitchell E, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 0012 (2006) Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant combined-modality chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:650–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D (2006) Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer: interpretation of the EXPERT study. J Clin Oncol 24:4664–4666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paquette IM, Kemp JA, Finlayson SR (2010) Patient and hospital factors associated with use of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glynne-Jones R, Wallace M, Livingstone J et al (2008) Complete clinical response after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: is a wait and see policy justified? Dis Colon Rectum 51:10–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hingorani M, Hartley JE, Greenman J, Macfie J (2011) Avoiding radical surgery after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy: a possible therapeutic option in rectal cancer? Acta Oncol 51:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D (1987) Psychosocial effects of stomas. Psychological morbidity one year after surgery. J Psychosom Res 31:311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2005) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent stoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004323

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross L, Annemette G, Abild-Nielsen O et al (2007) Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma. Support Care Cancer 15:505–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seow-Choen F (1996) Colonic pouches in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:881–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (2005) Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutten HJT, den Dulk M, van de Velde CJH, Lemmens VEPP, Marijnen CAM (2008) Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patioents. Lancet 9:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris DA, Davies M, Lucas MG, Drew P, Carr ND, Beynon J, Swansea Pelvic Oncology Group (2011) Multivisceral resection for primary locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 98:582–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Devesa JM, Lopez-Hervas P, Vicente R, Rey A, Die J, Fraile A (2005) Total anorectal reconstruction: a novel technique. Tech Coloproctol 9:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wexner SD, Rotholtz NA (2000) Surgeon influenced variables in resectional rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1606–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME et al (1995) Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38:259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortiz H, Armendariz P (1996) Anterior resection: do the patients perceive any clinical benefit? Int J Colorect Dis 11:191–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Montesani C, Pronio A, Santella S et al (2004) Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study. Hepatogastroenterology 51:718–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Szynglarewicz B, Zietek M, Forgacz J et al (2011) Urinary complications in rectal cancer patients are related to the dissection tool. Hepatogastroenterology 59:115–116

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ho VP, Lee Y, Stein SL, Temple LK (2011) Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 54:113–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rao G, Drew P, Lee PW, Monson JR, Duthie GS (1996) Anterior resection syndrome is secondary to sympathetic denervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:250–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallböök O, Sjodahl R (2000) Surgical approaches to obtaining optimal bowel function. Sem Surg Oncol 18:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Efthimiadis C, Basdanis G, Zatagias A et al (2004) Manometric and clinical evaluation of patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8:S205–S207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S (2006) Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome. Colorectal Dis 8:650–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Farouk R, Duthie G, Lee PWR et al (1998) Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 41:888–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ho Y, Tsang C, Tang C et al (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 43:169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee WY, Takahashi T, Pappas T, Mantyh CR, Ludwig KA (2008) Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility: an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome? Surgery 143:778–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Matzel K, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S et al (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis 12:82–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekkehard C, Jehle E, Haehnel T et al (1995) Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 169:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1992) Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hallböök O, Nystrom P, Sjödahl R (1997) Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F et al (1991) What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 34:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Miller AS, Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Finan PJ (1995) Factors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 82:1327–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1995) Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38:411–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Brown SR, Seow-Choen F (2000) Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum. Sem Surg Oncol 19:376–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Molloy RG, Ooran KT, Coulter J et al (1992) Mechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 35:462–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Otto IC, Ito K, Ye C et al (1996) Causes of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1423–1427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakahara S, Itoh H, Mibu R et al (1998) Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA stapler for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 31:762–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Delbro D, Nordgren S, Öresland T, Hultén L (1993) Possible role of the autonomic nervous system in sphincter impairment after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 80:631–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Emmersten KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hallböök O, Sjödahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S, Hohenberger W, Matzel KE (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim N (2005) Anatomic basis of sharp pelvic dissection for curative resection of rectal cancer. Yonsei Med J 46:737–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heald B (2008) Autonomic nerve preservation in rectal cancer surgery -the forgotten part of the TME message a practical “workshop” description for surgeons. Acta Chir Iugosl 55:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1991) Correlation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: serial studies in 20 patients with end-to-end pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lin CL, Chen CC (1996) The rectoanal relaxation reflex and continence: in repaired anorectal malformations with and without an internal sphincter saving procedure. J Pediatr Surg 31:630–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tomita R, Igarashi S (2008) A pathophysiological study using anorectal manometry on patients with or without soiling 5 years or more after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1584–1588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kang SB, Kim N, Lee KH, Kim YH, Kim JH, Kim JS (2008) Anal sphincter asymmetry in anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. World J Surg 32:2083–2088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zbar A, Aslam M, Gold DM, Gatzen C, Gosling A, Kmiot WA (1998) Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:200–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS (2002) Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:928–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ (1988) Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinent patients. Br J Surg 75:44–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJM (1987) Does preservation of the anal transition zone improve sensation after ileal-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Clinical controversies in inflammatory bowel disease. Topographia Negri SRC, Bologna, p 205

  61. Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG et al (1997) Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg 225:666–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Fichera A, Ragauskaite L, Silvestri MT et al (2007) Preservation of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Long-term effects on defecatory function. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1647–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Holder-Murray J, Fichera A (2009) Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 15:769–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG et al (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244:18–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Miller R, Orrom WJ, Duthie G, Bartolo DCC, Mortensen NJM (1990) Ambulatory anorectal physiology in patients following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: comparison with normal controls. Br J Surg 77:895–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Madoff RD, Orrom WJ, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1990) Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorect Dis 5:37–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Zbar AP (2007) Compliance and capacity of the normal human rectum—physical considerations and measurement pitfalls. Acta Chir Iugosl 54:49–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Sorensen M, Rasmussen OO, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J (1992) Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 79:1106–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1994) Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. A study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1228–1231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Fujimoto K et al (1996) Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch: prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size. Dis Colon Rectum 39:986–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S (1997) Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1409–1413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ho YH, Yu S, Ang ES, Seow-Choen F, Sundram F (2002) Small colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids—randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD006040

    Google Scholar 

  74. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Constantinides V et al (2006) Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Br J Surg 93:19–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Koh PK, Tang CL, Eu KW, Samuel M, Chan E (2007) A systematic review of the function and complications of colonic pouches. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Halböök O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjöhdahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F (1996) Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 83:978–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 84:1449–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1998) Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41:740–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD et al (1998) Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:817–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Barrier A, Martel P, Gallot D, Dugue L, Sezeur A, Malfosse M (1999) Long-term functional results of colonic J pouch versus straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 86:1176–1179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Heah SM, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Ho YH, Tang CL (2002) Prospective, randomized trial comparing sigmoid versus descending colonic J-pouch after total rectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 45:322–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungqvist O (2005) Functional and physiologic assessment of the colonic reservoir or side-to-end anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a two-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 48:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of the short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Park JG, Lee MR, Lim SB et al (2005) Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 11:2570–2573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Birrer S, Giachino D, Kern B, Buchler MW (2001) A new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch. Ann Surg 234:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM et al (2005) Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg 236:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Fürst A, Suttner S, Agha A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch versus coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1161–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Baker JW (1950) Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique. Arch Surg 61:143–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Jiang J-K, Yang S-H, Lin J-K (2005) Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2100–2110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Harris GK, Lavery IC, Fazio VW et al (2001) Function of a colonic J pouch continues to improve with time. Br J Surg 88:1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S et al (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Huber FT, Herter B, Siewert JR (1999) Colonic pouch versus side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 42:896–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Tsunoda A, Kamiyama G, Narita K, Watanabe M, Nakao K, Kusano M (2009) Prospective randomized trial for determination of optimum size of side limb in low anterior resection with side-to-end anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1572–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Fazio VW, Zutshio M, Remzi FH et al (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Mantyh CR, Hull TL, Fazio VW (2001) Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Pimentel JM, Duarte A, Gregorio C, Souto P, Patricio J (2003) Transverse coloplasty pouch and colonic J-pouch for rectal cancer—a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 5:465–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Yang Y-H, Nie L, Yu F-B et al (2006) A comparison of defecation function between coloplasty pouch and colonic J-pouch in patients after resection for rectal carcinoma. Clin J Cen Surg 21:816–818

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ulrich AB, Seiler CM, Z’graggen K, Löffler T, Weitz J, Büchler MW (2008) Early results fro a randomized clinical trial of colon J pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:1257–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Köninger JS, Butters M, Redecke JD, Z’graggen K (2004) Transverse coloplasty pouch after total mesorectal excision: functional assessment of evacuation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1586–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y, Tan A, Li X, Wu D (2010) Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty poouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12:624–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E et al (2005) Quality of life, functional outcome and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 48:735–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Nathanson DR, Espat NJ, Nash GM et al (2003) Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on long-term functional results of straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:888–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Kollmorgen CF, Meagher AP, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH, Martenson JA, Illstrup DM (1994) The long-term effect of adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma on bowel function. Ann Surg 220:676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Dalhlberg M, Glimelius B, Graf W, Påhlman L (1998) Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Birnbaum EH, Myerson RJ, Fry RD, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW (1994) Chronic effects of pelvic radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 37:909–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Gervaz P, Rotholtz N, Pisano M et al (2001) Quantitative short term study of anal sphincter function after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 41:543–551

    Google Scholar 

  108. Van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW et al (2002) Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2282–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Rullier E, Goffre B, Bonnel C, Zerbib F, Caudry M, Saric J (2001) Preoperative radiochemotherapy and sphincter-saving resection for T3 carcinomas of the lower third of the rectum. Ann Surg 234:633–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Ammann K, Kirchmayr W, Klaus A et al (2003) Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anal sphincter function in patients with carcinoma of the midrectum and low rectum. Arch Surg 138:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Parc Y, Zutshi M, Zalinski S, Ruppert R, Furst A, Fazio VW (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy is associated with worse functional results after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:2004–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Varma JS, Smith AN, Busuttil A (1986) Function of the anal sphincters after chronic radiation injury. Gut 27:528–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Mameghan H, Fischer R, Mameghan J, Watt WH, Tynan A (1990) Bowel complications after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: the volume effect. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:315–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Perez CA, Lee HK, Georgiou A, Lockett MA (1994) Technical factors affecting morbidity in definitive irradiation for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28:811–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. DaSilva GM, Berho M, Efron J et al (2001) Histological analysis of the anal sphincter after radiotherapy. Colorectal Dis 3:56–57

    Google Scholar 

  116. Lim JF, Tjandra JJ, Hiscock R, Chao MWT, Gibbs P (2005) Preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer causes prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Dis Colon Rectum 49:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Frykholm GJ, Sintorn K, Montelius A et al (1996) Acute lumbosacral plexopathy during and after preoperative radiotherapy of rectal adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 38:121–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Yeoh E, Botten RB, Russo A et al (2000) Chronic effects of therapeutic irradiation for localized prostatic carcinoma on anorectal function. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:915–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Krol R, Hopman WP, Smeenk RJ, Van Lin EN (2012) Increased rectal wall stiffness after prostate radiotherapy: relation with fecal urgency. Neurogastroenterol Motil. Jan 11. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01858.x. (Epub ahead of print)

  120. Ooi BS, Tjandra JJ, Green MD (1999) Morbidities of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for respectable rectal cancer: an overview. Dis Colon Rectum 42:403–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Lorchel F, Peignaux K, Créhange G et al (2007) Preoperative radiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 31:436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Hallböök O, Johansson K, Sjödahl R (1996) Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma—comparison between straight and colonic pouch. Br J Surg 83:389–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Zbar AP, Kennedy PJ, Singh V (2009) Functional outcome following restorative rectal cancer surgery. Acta Chir Iugosl 56:9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. de Gouveia Santos VL, Chaves EC, Kimura M (2006) Quality of life and coping of persons with temporary and permanent stomas. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 33:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1614–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ et al (2010) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1611–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Holzer B, Rosen HR, Zaglmaier W et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients after rectal resection—preliminary report. J Gastrointest Surg 12:921–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Moya P, Arroyo A, Soriano-Irigaray L, Frangi A, Candela Polo F, Calpena Rico R (2012) Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with severe fecal incontinence after rectal resection. Tech Coloproctol 16:263–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Ziv.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziv, Y., Zbar, A., Bar-Shavit, Y. et al. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol 17, 151–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3

Keywords

Navigation