Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate if pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) has additional effect on the classical physical treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) composed of hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound, and terminal isometric exercises. Forty patients (29 women and 11 men), ages 44 to 78 (mean age was 61.3 ± 7.8 years) were included in our study. Patients with knee osteoarthritis [Kellgren–Lawrence criteria grade 2 and above and an average pain intensity of 40 or more on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS)] recruited from outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic were randomly assigned to receive PEMF or sham PEMF treatment in addition to their physical therapy. Both the PEMF and sham PEMF treatments being evaluated were 55 min/session, five sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session comprise 20-min hot pack, 5-min therapeutic ultrasound, and 30-min PEMF or sham PEMF treatment applied to the knee of the patients. Patients were evaluated by the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index and VAS at the baseline and at the end of treatment. Both PEMF and sham PEMF treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in WOMAC pain and functional scores at the end of treatment (p < 0.001 in both groups). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function scores after treatment (p = 0.906, p = 0.855, p = 0.809, respectively). There was neither difference in concomitant used acetaminophen dose in both groups (p = 0.289). The results of this study show that PEMF does not have additional effect on the classical physical treatment in reducing symptoms of knee OA.
References
McCarthy CJ, Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA (2006) Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducing the pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 51:1–5. doi:10.1186/s1471-2474-7-51
Pipitone N, Scott DL (2001) Magnetic pulse treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 17:190–196. doi:10.1185/s03007-990-391170-61
Thamsborg G, Florescu A, Oturai P, Fallentin E, Tritsaris K, Dissingi S (2005) Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with pulsed electromagnetic fields: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13:575–581. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.012
Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Dyer RH Jr, Fielding LP, Miner WK, Markoll R (1993) A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 20:456–460
Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Markoll R (1994) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Rheumatol 21:1903–1911
Trock DH (2000) Electromagnetic fields and magnets. Investigational treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 26:51–62
Zizic TM, Hoffman KC, Holt PA, Hungerford DS, O’Dell JR, Jacobs MA et al (1995) The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation. J Rheumatol 9:1757–1761
Sharma L (2002) Nonpharmacologic management of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:603–607
Ciombor DM, Lester G, Aaron RK, Neame P, Caterson B (2002) Low frequency EMF regulates chondrocyte differentiation and expression of matrix proteins. J Orthop Res 1:40–50. doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(01)00071-7
Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daşkapan A, Bayramoğlu M (2005) Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13:28–33. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010
Ay S, Evcik D (2009) The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 29:663–666. doi:10.1007/s00296-008-0754-x
Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML (1999) Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38:870–877
Atamaz F, Hepguler S, Oncu J (2005) Translation and validation of the Turkish version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 32:1331–1336
Aaron RK, Boyan BD, Ciombor DM, Schwartz Z, Simon BJ (2004) Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 419:30–37
De Mattei M, Caruso A, Pezzetti F, Pellati A, StabelliniG SV (2001) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human articular chondrocyte proliferation. Connect Tissue Res 42:269–279
Pezzetti F, De Mattei M, Caruso A, Cadossi R, Zucchini P, Carinci F et al (1999) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human chondrocytes: an in vitro study. Calcif Tissue Int 65:396–401. doi:10.1007/s002239900720
Diniz P, Soejima K, Ito G (2002) Nitric oxide mediates the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on the osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Nitric Oxide 7:18–23
Aaron RK, Ciombor DMK (1996) Acceleration of experimental endochondral ossification by biophysical stimulation of the progenitor cell pool. J Orthop Res 14:582–589. doi:10.1002/jor.1100140412
Liu H, Lees P, Abbott J, Bee JA (1997) Pulsed electromagnetic fields preserve proteoglycan composition of extracellular matrix in embryonic chick sternal cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta 2:303–314
Liu H, Abbott J, Bee JA (1996) Pulsed electromagnetic fields influence hyaline cartilage extracellular matrix composition without affecting molecular structure. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1:63–76
Fini M, Giavaresi G, Torricelli P, Cavani F, Setti S, Canè V, Giardino R (2005) Pulsed electromagnetic fields reduce knee osteoarthritic lesion progression in the aged Dunkin Hartley guinea pig. J Orthop Res 23:899–908. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.008
Rogachefsky RA, Altman RD, Markov MS, Cheung HS (2004) Use of a permanent magnetic field to inhibit the development of canine osteoarthritis. Bioelectromagnetics 25:260–270. doi:10.1002/bem.10192
Fini M, Torricelli P, Giavaresi G, Aldini NN, Cavani F, Setti S, Nicolini A, Carpi A, Giardino R (2008) Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation on knee cartilage, subchondral and epyphiseal trabecular bone of aged Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs. Biomed Pharmacother 62:709–715. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2007.03.001
De Mattei M, Pasello M, Pellati A, Stabellini G, Massari L, Gemmati D, Caruso A (2003) Effects of electromagnetic fields on proteoglycanmetabolism of bovine articular cartilage explants. Connect Tissue Res 44:154–159
Ciombor DM, Aaron RK, Wang S, Simon B (2003) Modification of osteoarthritis by pulsed electromagnetic field a morphological study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11:455–462. doi:10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00083-9
Disclosures
No conflict of interest has been declared by all authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Özgüçlü, E., Çetin, A., Çetin, M. et al. Additional effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on knee osteoarthritis treatment: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Rheumatol 29, 927–931 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1453-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1453-z