Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many countries back and neck problems are the most common reason for work incapacity. Numerous studies have looked for reliable predictors of return to work (RTW) or not return to work (NRTW) for those incapacitated, but with few exceptions their predictive and detective ability has been limited. We aimed to perform a comparative study of various commonly used health measures ability to predict RTW or NRTW in a cohort of men and women sick-listed for more than 28 days due to low-back pain (LBP) or neck pain (NP). A cohort of 1,575 men and women sick-listed more than 28 days due to back or neck problems was asked to answer ten different health measures (scales) about various aspects of health status (health related quality of life, pain, back function and depressivity) at four occasions during a 2-year period. A statistical diagnostic test was used to study how well the subject’s values on these scales would serve as a predictor for work resumption. There was an improvement from day 28 up until 2 years, reflected by the different scales, more pronounced for LBP than for NP patients and for men with LBP compared with women with LBP. For all separately tested scales EuroQol (EQ-5D) had the highest overall ability to predict RTW or NRTW irrespective of gender, diagnoses or duration of the problems. When RTW or NRTW were predicted in a cohort of sick-listed low-back or neck patients, EQ-5D had outstanding properties in this respect irrespective of gender, diagnosis or elapsed time during this 2-year study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Gobeille D et al (1995) The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries. Spine 20:791–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG (1995) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London, p 415

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aronoff G (2000) Preventing disability from chronic pain: a review and reappraisal. Int Rev Psychiatry 12:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck SE Jr (1986) The use of relative operating characteristics (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Lathol Lab Med 110:13–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergendorff S, Hansson E, Hansson T (1997) Projektbeskrivning & undersökningsgrupp. Stockholm: Rikförsäkringsverket, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset; Report No. 1

  6. Bigos S, Battie M, Fisher L (1991) Methodology for evaluating predictive factors for the report of back injury. Spine 16:669–670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Björk S, Norinder A (1999) The weighting exercise for the Swedish version of the EuroQol. Health Econ 8:117–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloch F, Prins R (eds) (2000) Who returns to work & why? A six country study on work incapacity & reintegration. Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burström K (2003) Population Health and Inequalities in Health—measurement of health-related quality of life and changes in QALY over time in Sweden. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell M (1990) Medical statistics. A commonsense approach. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolan P (1990) A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. In: York Center for Health Economics Discussion Paper No 138. University of York, York

  14. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbain D, Abdel-Moty E, Cutler R et al (1994) Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the dictionary of occupational titles. Spine 19:872–880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fishbain D, Cutler R, Rosomoff H et al (1999) Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery. Clin J Pain 15:102–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank J, Brooker A, DeMaio S et al (1996) Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 21:2918–2929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D (1996) Outcomes research in Washington state workers’ compensation. Am J Ind Med 29:642–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher R, Rauh V, Haugh L et al (1989) Determinants of return-to-work among low back pain patients. Pain 39:55–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansson E, Hansson T (2004) The cost for subjects sick listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. Eur Spine J (in press)

  21. Hansson T, Jensen J (2003) Sjukskrivning - orsaker och praxis. En systematisk litteraturöversikt. SBU-rapport, Stockholm

  22. Hansson T, Hansson E (2000) The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine 25:3055–3064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hogg-Johnson S, Cole D (2003) Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries. Occup Environ Med 60:244–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 20:473–477

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1994) Grading of backache. Ther Umsch 51:375–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kool J, Oesch P, de Bie R (2002) Predictive tests for non-return to work in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 11:258–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Korff von M, Ormel J, Keefe F et al (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kovacs F, Abraira V, Zamora J et al (2004) Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain. Spine 29:206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L et al (2001) Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 40:464–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krause N, Ragland D (1994) Occupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine 19:1011–1020

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krause N, Ragland D, Greiner B et al (1997) Psychosocial job factors associated with back and neck pain in public transit operators. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:179–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lancourt J, Kettelhut M (1992) Predicting return to work for lower back pain patients receiving worker’s compensation. Spine 17:629–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Linton S, Boersma K (2003) Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 19:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Linton S, Hallden K (1998) Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 14:209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maher C (2000) A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Aust J Physiother 46:259–269

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mahmud M, Webster B, Courtney T et al (2000) Clinical management and the duration of disability for work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med 42:1178–1187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T et al (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain–bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?. N Engl J Med 332:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mannion A, Dolan P, Adams M (1996) Psychological questionnaires: do “abnormal” scores precede or follow first-time low back pain? Spine 21:2603–2611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nachemson A, Jonsson E (2000) Neck and back pain. The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nachemson A, Jonsson E (eds) (2000) Ont I ryggen, ont I nacken. SBU Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering. Report No: 145. Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sewitch M, Rossignol M, Bellavance F et al (2000) First lifetime back pain and psychiatry treatment: psychological factors and recovery in compensated workers. Aaohn J 48:234–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shaw W, Pransky G, Fitzgerald T (2001) Early prognosis for low back disability: intervention strategies for health care providers. Disabil Rehabil 23:815–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Spengler D, Bigos S, Martin N et al (1986) Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study I overview and cost analysis. Spine 11:241–245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Staal J, Hlobil H, van Tulder M et al (2002) Return-to-work interventions for low back pain: a descriptive review of contents and concepts of working mechanisms. Sports Med 32:251–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware J (1994) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey 1. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Göteborg

  46. Waddell G, Sawney P (2002) Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: an international literature review and analysis. London

  47. Ware J, Kosisnki M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 Health survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, Boston

  48. Williams D, Feuerstein M, Durbin D et al (1998) Health care and indemnity costs across the natural history of disability in occupational low back pain. Spine 23:2329–2336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zung W(1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from The Medical Faculty, Göteborg University and the Swedish Council for Social Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna stråket 11, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden

    Elisabeth Hansson & Tommy Hansson

  2. Department of Statistics, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Robert Jonsson

Authors
  1. Elisabeth Hansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tommy Hansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Jonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, E., Hansson, T. & Jonsson, R. Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems. Eur Spine J 15, 780–793 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0863-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0863-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation