Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of marital coping on the relationship between body image and sexuality among breast cancer survivors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of the study were (1) to understand the relationship between women’s marital coping efforts and body image as well as sexual relationships and (2) to test a hypothesized model suggesting that marital coping efforts have a mediating effect on the relationship between body image and sexual relationships among breast cancer survivors.

Methods

A total of 135 breast cancer survivors who had finished cancer treatment completed a self-reported questionnaire concerning body image, marital coping efforts, and sexual relationship.

Results

Body image, marital coping, and sexual relationship were found to be significantly correlated with each other. The final path model showed that negative marital coping efforts, including avoidance and self-blame, significantly mediated the effect of women’s body image on their sexual relationships. Although a positive approach did not correlate with body image, it did significantly correlate with women’s sexual relationships.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that negative marital coping using self-blame and avoidance mediated the association between body image and sexual relationship. Future interventions to address the body image and sexual life of breast cancer survivors should be considered using positive approaches that prevent disengaged avoidance or self-blame coping efforts intended to deal with marital stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GLOBOCAN (2014) Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. World Health Organization. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/Editors.aspx. Accessed 22, Apr. 2014

  2. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse S, Kosary C, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z (2011) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute 19

  3. Emilee G, Ussher J, Perz J (2010) Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Maturitas 66(4):397–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill EK, Sandbo S, Abramsohn E, Makelarski J, Wroblewski K, Wenrich ER, McCoy S, Temkin SM, Yamada SD, Lindau ST (2011) Assessing gynecologic and breast cancer survivors’ sexual health care needs. Cancer 117(12):2643–2651

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manganiello A, Hoga LAK, Reberte LM, Miranda CM, Rocha CAM (2011) Sexuality and quality of life of breast cancer patients post mastectomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(2):167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D'Onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR (2006) Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psycho-oncology 15(7):579–594. doi:10.1002/pon.991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berterö C, Wilmoth MC (2007) Breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment affecting the self: a meta-synthesis. Cancer Nurs 30(3):194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen BL (2009) In sickness and in health: maintaining intimacy after breast cancer recurrence. Cancer J (Sudbury, Mass) 15(1):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrusi B, Faezee H (2008) How do Iranian women with breast cancer conceptualize sex and body image? Sex Disabil 26(3):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Speer JJ, Hillenberg B, Sugrue DP, Blacker C, Kresge CL, Decker VB, Zakalik D, Decker DA (2005) Study of sexual functioning determinants in breast cancer survivors. Breast J 11(6):440–447. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00131.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Belin TR, Meyerowitz BE, Rowland JH (1999) Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 17(8):2371–2380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reese JB, Keefe FJ, Somers TJ, Abernethy AP (2010) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer: the use of flexible coping. Support Care Cancer 18(7):785–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinsinger SW, Laurenceau J-P, Carver CS, Antoni MH (2011) Perceived partner support and psychosexual adjustment to breast cancer. Psychol Health 26(12):1571–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Schafenacker AM, Weiss D (2012) The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. Semin Oncol Nurs 28(4):236–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kayser K, Scott JL (2008) Helping couples cope with women’s cancers, vol 229. Springer,

  16. Skerrett K (1998) Couple adjustment to the experience of breast cancer. Families, systems, & health 16 (3):281

  17. Zunkel G (2003) Relational coping processes: couples’ response to a diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 20(4):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krueger DW (2004) Psychodynamic perspectives on body image. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T (eds) Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 30–37

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crompvoets S (2006) Comfort, control, or conformity: women who choose breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Health Care Women Int 27(1):75–93. doi:10.1080/07399330500377531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang SY, Balneaves LG, Shu BC (2010) “A struggle between vanity and life”: the experience of receiving breast reconstruction in women of Taiwan. Cancer Nurs 33(5):E1–E11. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181d1c853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL (2000) Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 68(4):697–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA (2010) Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol 29(2):169

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fang SY, Chang HT, Shu BC (2014) The links of objectified body consciousness, body image discomfort, and depressive symptoms among breast cancer survivors in Taiwan. Psychol Women Quart 38(4):563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott JL, Halford WK, Ward BG (2004) United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 72(6):1122–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norton TR, Manne SL, Rubin S, Hernandez E, Carlson J, Bergman C, Rosenblum N (2005) Ovarian cancer patients’ psychological distress: the role of physical impairment, perceived unsupportive family and friend behaviors, perceived control, and self-esteem. Health Psychol: Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc 24(2):143–152. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.2.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowman ML (1990) Coping efforts and marital satisfaction: measuring marital coping and its correlates. J Marriage Fam 52:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee LJ (1997) Model testing of the process of marital coping behavior. J Chengchi Univ 74:53–94

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berglund G, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Sjödén P-O, Rutquist L-E (2001) Effect of endocrine treatment on sexuality in premenopausal breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Oncol 19(11):2788–2796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor‐Brown J, Kilpatrick M, Maunsell E, Dorval M (2000) Partner abandonment of women with breast cancer: myth or reality? Cancer Pract 8(4):160–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lt H, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model: Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fu MR, Xu B, Liu Y, Haber J (2008) ‘Making the best of it’: Chinese women’s experiences of adjusting to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. J Adv Nurs 63:155–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ashing-Giwa KT, Padilla G, Tejero J, Kraemer J, Wright K, Coscarelli A, Clayton S, Williams I, Hills D (2004) Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: a qualitative study of African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors. Psycho-oncol 13:408–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Giese-Davis J, Hermanson K, Koopman C, Weibel D, Spiegel D (2000) Quality of couples’ relationship and adjustment to metastatic breast cancer. J Fam Psychol 14(2):251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott JL, Kayser K (2009) A review of couple-based interventions for enhancing women's sexual adjustment and body image after cancer. Cancer J 15(1):48–56. doi:10.1097/PPO.1090b1013e31819585df

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson J, Gerbing D (1984) The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika 49(2):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bearden WO, Sharma S, Teel JE (1982) Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. J Mark Res 19(4):425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bollen KA (1990) Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol Bull 107(2):256–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Iacobucci D (2010) Structural equations modeling: fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J Consum Psychol 20(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Su CT, Ng HS, Yang AL, Lin CY (2014) Psychometric evaluation of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) for patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Assess 26(3):980–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Boquiren VM, Esplen MJ, Wong J, Toner B, Warner E (2013) Exploring the influence of gender‐role socialization and objectified body consciousness on body image disturbance in breast cancer survivors. Psycho‐Oncol 22:2177–2185

    Google Scholar 

  42. Manne S, Sherman M, Ross S, Ostroff J, Heyman RE, Fox K (2004) Couples’ support-related communication, psychological distress, and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 72(4):660–670. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital of Taiwan for its support of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su-Ying Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, SY., Lin, YC., Chen, TC. et al. Impact of marital coping on the relationship between body image and sexuality among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 23, 2551–2559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2612-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2612-1

Keywords

Navigation