Skip to main content
Log in

Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic appendectomy has some advantages over open appendectomy, some reports do show more postoperative intraabdominal abscesses.

Methods

A retrospective review of complicated appendicitis managed surgically by eight surgical groups from six countries was undertaken. Among 3,433 patients with appendicitis, 1,017 (29.5%) had complicated appendicitis, which included perforated or gangrenous appendicitis with or without localized or disseminated peritonitis. There were 74 preoperative abscesses (7.4%) and 5 small bowel obstructions.

Results

One patient died. There were 29 postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (2.8%) and 112 mostly minor complications. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for 28 patients (2.7%). The surgical time ranged from 32 to 132 min (mean, 62 min), and the hospital stay ranged from 1 to 18 days (mean, 3.5 days).

Conclusions

The morbidity rates, particularly for intraabdominal abscesses, were less for laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis than those reported in the literature for open appendectomy, whereas operating times and hospital stays were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod RS (2003) Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 46: 263–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ball CG, Kortbeck JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 18: 969–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brosseuk DT , Bathe OF (1999) Day-care laparoscopic appendectomies. Can J Surg 42: 138–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung RS, Rowland Dy, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177: 250–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cueto J, Rojas O, Garteiz D, Rodriguez M, Weber A (1997) The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis: experience with 107 cases in Mèxico City. Surg Endosc 11: 366–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cueto GJ, Valencia-Reyes MS, Vázquez-Frías JA, Castañeda P, Nevarez R, Weber A (2000) Technical modifications for laparoscopic appendectomy and other pelvis procedures using microinstruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10: 211–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cueto J, Vazquez JA (2003) Appendectomy. In: Cueto J, Gagner M, Jacobs M (eds) Laparoscopic surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, chap 39 pp:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Dombal FT, Clamp SE, Wardle KS (1987) Measuring surgical performance in acute abdominal pain: some reflections from international studies. Epidemiol Rev 9: 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) (1995) Consensus development conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense. Dig Surg 19: 518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 23: 835–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littemberg E (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta analysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guller U, Hervey SH, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall D, Miller BJ, Menzies BL (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, Sweeney J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hebebrand D, Troidi H, Spangenberger W, Neugebauer E, Schwalm T, Gunther MW (1994) Laparoskopische oder Klassische appendektomie? Eine prospektiv random-isierte studie. Chirurg 65: 112–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffner H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscpic versus open appendicectomy. Br J. Surg. 86: 48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R. Mavor E (2000) Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 180: 456–459, discussion 460–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical study. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazemier G, Steyerberg EA, Bonjer HJ (1997) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic appendectomy. Scientific Session. The Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Meeting of the Americas, San Diego California 19–22 March

  25. Khalili TM, Hiatt JR, Savar A, Lau C, Margulies DR (1999) Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy. Am Surg 65: 965–967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Wetscher GJ, Szinicz G (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 175: 232–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PM, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Br J Surg 80: 1599–1600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCall JL, Sharples K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moberg AC, Montegomery A (1997) Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 459–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Novitsky YW, Litwin DEM, Callery MP (2004) The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery. Surg E‘ndosc 18: 1411–1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) Prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169: 208–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Taner I (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies J Gastrointest Surg 1: 188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paya K. Rauhofeer U, Rebhandl W, Deluggi St, Horcher E (2000) Perforating appendicitis: an indication for laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 14: 182–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA, Risk factors for postappendectomy intraabdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 199: 373–374

  38. Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E, Edwin B, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lagenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18: CD 001546

    Google Scholar 

  41. Slim K, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparoscopic or open appendectomy: critical review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 4: 398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum CK 2002 Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26: 1485–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang E, Ortega AE, Anthone GJ, Beart RW Jr (1996) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and. Appendectomies. Surg Endosc 10: 327–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Weber A, Vazquez JA, Valencia S, Cueto J (1998) Retrieval of specimens in laparoscopy using reclosable zipper-type plastic bags: a simple, cheap and useful method. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 457–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Cueto.

Additional information

Presented in part at the 12th European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) International Congress, 9–12 June 2004, in Barcelona, Spain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cueto, J., D’Allemagne, B., Vázquez-Frias, J.A. et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20, 717–720 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0402-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0402-4

Keywords

Navigation