Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational paraquat exposure of agricultural workers in large Costa Rican farms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Paraquat is an herbicide widely used worldwide. This study determined the extent of occupational exposure to paraquat among farm workers in Costa Rica and identified determinants of occupational exposure.

Methods

Twenty-four hour urine samples were collected from 119 paraquat handlers and 54 non-handlers from banana, coffee and palm oil farms. Information about herbicide handling operations was also collected. The urinary paraquat levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2 ng/mL. Inhalable dust and airborne paraquat levels were simultaneously measured for a subset of the participants.

Results

Urinary paraquat measurements were non-detectable or very low when workers did not handle paraquat. For handlers, 83.3, 47.1 and 63.9% of the samples were below the LOQ on before-, during- and after-paraquat spray days, respectively. The arithmetic mean (±SD) of urinary paraquat level on days when workers handled paraquat was 6.3 (±10.45) μg/24 h. Paraquat exposures among handlers on spray day were significantly associated with the type of crop.

Conclusion

Non-handlers had negligible urinary paraquat, while detectable paraquat exposures were observed among handlers on spray day. Urinary paraquat levels were different by crop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessio L, Berlin A, Dellorto A, Toffoletto F, Ghezzi I (1985) Reliability of urinary creatinine as a parameter used to adjust values of urinary biological indicators. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 55:99–106. doi:10.1007/BF00378371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2008) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Arbuckle TE, Burnett R, Cole D, Teschke K, Dosemeci M, Bancej C et al (2002) Predictors of herbicide exposure in farm applicators. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:406–414. doi:10.1007/s00420-002-0323-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake DK, Gallagher RT, Woollen BH (2002) Improved methods for the analysis of paraquat in biological fluids. Chromatographia 55:183–185. doi:10.1007/BF02493377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester G, Woollen BH (1981) Studies of the occupational exposure of Malaysian plantation workers to paraquat. Br J Ind Med 38:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester G, Gurunathan G, Jones N, Woollen BH (1993) Occupational exposure of Sri Lankan tea plantation workers to paraquat. Bull World Health Organ 71:625–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel JW, Gage JC (1966) Absorption and excretion of diquat and paraquat in rats. Br J Ind Med 23:133–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajslova J, Cuhra P, Davidek T, Dacidek J (1989) Gas chromatographic determination of diquat and paraquat in crops. J Chromatogr A 479:243–250. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)83340-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris SA, Purdham JT, Corey PN, Sass-Kortsak AM (2000) An evaluation of 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion for use in identification of incomplete urine collections and adjustment of absorbed dose of pesticides. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 61:649–657. doi 10.1202/0002-8894(2000)061<0649:AEOUCE>2.0.CO;2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth GM, Bennett PN, Davies DS (1981) Kinetics of paraquat elimination in the dog. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 57:139–145. doi:10.1016/0041-008X(81)90273-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knuiman JT, Hautvast JGA, Van der Heyden L, Geboers J, Joossens JV, Tornqvist H et al (1986) A multi-centre study on completeness of urine collection in 11 European centres. I. Some problems with the use of creatinine and 4-aminobenzoic acid as markers of the completeness of collection. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 40:229–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koivunen M, Gee SJ, Park E-K, Lee K, Schenker MB, Hammock BD (2005) Application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the analysis of paraquat in human-exposure samples. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:184–190. doi:10.1007/s00244-003-0251-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staiff DC, Comer SW, Armstrong JF, Wolfe HR (1975) Exposure to the herbicide, paraquat. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 14:334–340. doi:10.1007/BF01685647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swan AAB (1969) Exposure of spray operators to paraquat. Br J Ind Med 26:322–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tompsett SL (1970) Paraquat poisoning. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 28:346–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker BV, Pack DE, Ospenson JN (1967) Adsorption of bipyridylium herbicides in soil. J Agric Food Chem 15:1005–1008. doi:10.1021/jf60154a017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1997) Reregistration eligibility decision (RED), paraquat dichloride. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (EPA 738-F-96-018)

  • Van Emon J, Hammock B, Seiber JN (1986) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for paraquat and its application to exposure analysis. Anal Chem 58:1866–1873. doi:10.1021/ac00121a057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wendel de Joode B, De Graaf IAM, Wesseling C, Kromhout H (1996) Paraquat exposure of knapsack spray operators on banana plantations in Costa Rica. Int J Occup Environ Health 2:294–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wojeck GA, Price JF, Nigg HN, Stamper JH (1983) Worker exposure to paraquat and diquat. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12:65–70. doi:10.1007/BF01055003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all workers whose cooperative participation enabled us to complete the study. We appreciate the efforts of Mr. Hector Duarte Tagles and Ms. Tamara Hennessy-Burt for their assistance with the project. We wish to acknowledge and thank the members of the science advisory panel, Drs. David Christiani (chair), Richard Fenske, Bertold Hock, Rogelio Perez-Padilla, and Mark Segal, for their careful and critical review of the scientific aspects of the study. This research was supported by Syngenta Research Agreement 002994, the Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety, funded by a grant from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cooperative Agreement # U07/CCU9061202, NIEHS Center for Environmental Health Sciences P30 ES05707 and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 5 P42 ES04699 and R37 ES02710. However, it has not been subjected to funding agency review and does not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K., Park, EK., Stoecklin-Marois, M. et al. Occupational paraquat exposure of agricultural workers in large Costa Rican farms. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 455–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0356-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0356-7

Keywords

Navigation