Abstract
Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the unaffected hemisphere can enhance function of the paretic hand in patients with mild motor impairment. Effects of low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional motor cortex at an early stage of mild to severe hemiparesis after stroke are unknown. In this pilot, randomized, double-blind clinical trial we compared the effects of low-frequency rTMS or sham rTMS as add-on therapies to outpatient customary rehabilitation, in 30 patients within 5–45 days after ischemic stroke, and mild to severe hand paresis. The primary feasibility outcome was compliance with the interventions. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of intervention-related adverse events. Performance of the paretic hand in the Jebsen–Taylor test and pinch strength were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after ten sessions of treatment administered over 2 weeks and at 1 month after end of treatment. Baseline clinical features were comparable across groups. For the primary feasibility outcome, compliance with treatment was 100% in the active group and 94% in the sham group. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events. There were significant improvements in performance in the Jebsen–Taylor test (mean, 12.3% 1 month after treatment) and pinch force (mean, 0.5 Newtons) in the active group, but not in the sham group. Low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional motor cortex early after stroke is feasible, safe and potentially effective to improve function of the paretic hand, in patients with mild to severe hemiparesis. These promising results will be valuable to design larger randomized clinical trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ (2003) Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 34:2181–2186
Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, Requejo P, Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW (2009) Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil 16:237–253
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A (2009) Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 8:741–754
Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG (2004) Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 55:400–409
Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M et al (2008) Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol 65:741–747
Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Ameli M, Fink GR (2009) Interhemispheric competition after stroke: brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:641–656
Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Watanabe I, Ikoma K (2005) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 36:2681–2686
Kakuda W, Abo M, Kaito N, Ishikawa A, Taguchi K, Yokoi A (2010) Six-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus occupational therapy for post-stroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: a case series study. Disabil Rehabil 32:801–807
Takeuchi N, Tada T, Toshima M, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K (2009) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over bilateral hemispheres enhances motor function and training effect of paretic hand in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 41:1049–1054
Khedr EM, Abdel-Fadeil MR, Farghali A, Qaid M (2009) Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 16:1323–1330
Emara TH, Moustafa RR, ElNahas NM et al (2010) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1 Hz and 5 Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 17:1203–1209
Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC (2005) Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 65:466–468
Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH et al (2011) Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain 134:1591–1609
Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C (2001) Treatment-induced reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31:1210–1216
Lin KC, Chung HY, Wu CY et al (2010) Constraint-induced therapy versus control intervention in patients with stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89:177–185
Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL et al (2009) Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology 73:195–201
Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Bland ST, James DC, Schallert T (1999) Use-dependent exaggeration of brain injury: is glutamate involved? Exp Neurol 157:349–358
Bland ST, Schallert T, Strong R, Aronowski J, Grotta JC (2000) Early exclusive use of the affected forelimb after moderate transient focal ischemia in rats: functional and anatomic outcome. Stroke 31:1144–1152
Cramer SC (2008) Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol 63:272–287
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, The Safety of TMS Consensus Group (2009) Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 120:2008–2039
Ziemann U (2004) TMS and drugs. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1717–1729
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
de Caneda MAG, Fernandes JG, de Almeida AG, Mugnol FE (2006) Reliability of neurological assessment scales in patients with stroke. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr 64:690–697
Conforto AB, Ferreiro KN, Tomasi C et al (2010) Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:263–272
Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A et al (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:79–92
Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 50:311–319
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC et al (2006) A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke 37:2115–2122
Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P et al (2005) Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 128:490–499
Beebe JA, Lang CE (2009) Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first 6 months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 33:96–103
Mathiowetz V, Rennells C, Donahoe L (1985) Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am 10:694–697
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13–31
Bohannon RW, Melissa MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67:206–207
Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178–S189
Arenillas JF (2011) Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke 42:S20–S23
Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2011) Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 5:708–712
Clarkson AN, Huang BS, Macisaac SE, Mody I, Carmichael ST (2010) Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke. Nature 468:305–309
Ameli M, Grefkes C, Kemper F et al (2009) Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Ann Neurol 66:298–309
Seitz RJ, Donnan GA (2010) Role of neuroimaging in promoting long-term recovery from ischemic stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:756–772
Sterr A, Shen S, Szameitat AJ, Herron KA (2010) The role of corticospinal tract damage in chronic motor recovery and neurorehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24:413–419
Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al (2006) Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296:2095–2104
Conforto AB, Paulo RB, Patroclo CB et al (2008) Stroke management in a university hospital in the largest South American city. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr 66:308–311
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by grant 2006/55504-0 from São Paulo State’s Foundation for Research Support (FAPESP), a Brazilian governmental agency. The authors have no financial relationships with FAPESP. Scholarships from FAPESP were funded to Erina Nagaya (2009/51641-0 and 2010/12696-1) and Sarah dos Anjos (2010/15660-8). FAPESP had no roles in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. We thank David Luckenbaugh for helpful discussions about statistical analysis of the data.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conforto, A.B., Anjos, S.M., Saposnik, G. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mild to severe hemiparesis early after stroke: a proof of principle and novel approach to improve motor function. J Neurol 259, 1399–1405 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6364-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6364-7