Skip to main content
Log in

ALS multidisciplinary clinic and survival

Results from a population-based study in Southern Italy

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting motorneurons, for which there is no effective cure. Because of the multifactorial nature of impairment and disablity in ALS, multidisciplinary clinics (MDC) have been recently introduced in the management of ALS patients; their effects on survival remain, however, largely debated.

Objective

To compare survival of ALS patients who received their care at MDC with that of patients followed by general neurology clinics.

Methods

Source of the study was a prospective population-based registry of ALS established in Puglia, Southern Italy, in 1997. We examined survival of 126 out of 130 incident ALS cases that were diagnosed during the period 1998–99.

Results

84 patients (67%) were enrolled and followed by MDC and the remaining 42 (33%) by general neurological clinics. No difference in median survival time from the diagnosis was observed between patients followed by ALS multidisciplinary (17.6 months) and general clinics (18 months). No beneficial effect was present among bulbar onset ALS (11.7 versus 23 months). In multivariate analysis management by ALS MDC was associated with only a 10% increase in survival probability at 12 months (HR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.44–1.89; p = 0.9).

Conclusions

In this population-based series, we found that in Southern Italy management of ALS by multidisciplinary clinics does not improve survival, regardless of site of symptoms onset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen PM, Borasio GD, Dengler R, et al. (2005) EFNS task force on management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: guidelines for diagnosing and clinical care of patients and relatives. Eur J Neurol 12:921–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aupperle PM, Coyne AC (2000) Primary vs subspecialty care: a structured follow-up of dementia patients and their caregivers. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 8:167–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V (1994) A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS/Riluzole Study Group. N Engl J Med 330:585–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Delumeau JC, et al. (2002) A study of riluzole in the treatment of advanced stage or elderly patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 249:609–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley WG, Anderson F, Bromberg M, et al. (2001) Current management of ALS: comparison of the ALS CARE Database and the AAN Practice Parameter. The American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 57:500–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks BR (1994) El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subcommittee on Motor Neuron Diseases/Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Neuromuscular Diseases and the El Escorial “Clinical limits of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” workshop contributors. J Neurol Sci 124 Suppl:96–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, et al. (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1:293–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chio A, Bottacchi E, Buffa C, et al. (2006) Positive effects of tertiary centers for amyotrophic lateral Sclerosis on outcome and use of hospital facilities. J Nurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:948–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox D (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forbes RB, Colville S, Cran GW, et al. (2004) Unexpected decline in survival from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neurone disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1753–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutchinson M, Galvin R, Sweeney B, et al. (2004) Effect of a multidisciplinary clinic on survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1208–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JR, Annegers JF, Appel SH (1995) Prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the effect of referral selection. J Neurol Sci 132:207–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leigh PN, Abrahams S, Al-Chalabi A, et al. (2003) The management of motor neurone disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(Suppl 4):iv32–iv47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Logroscino G, Beghi E, Zoccolella S, et al. (2005) Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in southern Italy: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1094–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller RG, Rosenberg JA, Gelinas DF, et al. (1999) Practice parameter: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology: ALS Practice Parameters Task Force. Neurology 52:1311–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robbins RA, Simmons Z, Bremer BA, et al. (2001) Quality of life in ALS is maintained as physical function declines. Neurology 56:442–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rocha JA, Reis C, Simoes F, et al. (2005) Diagnostic investigation and multidisciplinary management in motor neuron disease. J Neurol 252:1435–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowland LP, Shneider NA (2001) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 344:1688–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simmons Z (2005) Management strategies for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from diagnosis through death. Neurologist 11:257–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sorenson EJ, Stalker AP, Kurland LT, et al. (2002) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1925 to 1998. Neurology 59:280–2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thornton FJ, Fotheringham T, Alexander M, et al. (2002) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: enteral nutrition provision–endoscopic or radiologic gastrostomy? Radiology 224:713–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Traynor BJ, Alexander M, Corr B, et al. (2003) Effect of a multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinic on ALS survival: a population based study, 1996–2000. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1258–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Traynor BJ, Alexander M, Corr B, et al. (2003) An outcome study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis–a population-based study in Ireland, 1996–2000. J Neurol 250:473–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Traynor BJ, Hardiman O (2004) Effect of a multidisciplinary clinic on survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1209

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van den Berg JP, Kalmijn S, Lindeman E, et al. (2005) Multidisciplinary ALS care improves quality of life in patients with ALS. Neurology 65:1264–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarlo Logroscino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zoccolella, S., Beghi, E., Palagano, G. et al. ALS multidisciplinary clinic and survival. J Neurol 254, 1107–1112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0401-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0401-y

Key words

Navigation