Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group therapy for memory impaired patients: A partial remediation is possible

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

To analyse the prospect of memory training for patients with organic brain damage.

Methods

Sixty-two patients with memory disorder were assigned to three different groups: a control group (n=16) with low dose memory training, a process oriented memory training group (POT) (n=24) and a group (ST) who was taught to compensate for memory problems with different strategies (n=22). Most of the patients had suffered a stroke. Inclusion criteria were medium to weak memory impairment defined by the patients’ performance in the California Verbal Learning Test. Patients with complete amnesia were excluded. Specific care was taken that the groups did not differ in age, time since illness, duration of rehabilitation effort, verbal and performance IQ,memory and attention performance. The two treatment groups received 20 hours memory training, the low dose memory training control group 7 sessions.

Results

The treatment groups improved in verbal and prospective memory, but only the group with POT experienced a significant improvement compared with the control group. Training effects were specific, i. e. they affected verbal memory, but were not encapsulated, i. e. generalized to the recall of prose passages and of appointments. The POT group also showed a statistically weak outperformance compared with the ST group and some attentional improvement as well.

Conclusion

Memory training is effective in patients with organic brain lesion, but only if applied frequently. Comparing the two training high intensity treatments, a POT focus seems to be superior to teaching a set of compensation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD (2002) Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults. JAMA 288:2271–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bäumler G (1974) Lern- und Gedächtnistest: LGT-3. Göttingen: Hogrefe

  3. Berg IJ, Koning-Haanstra M, Deelman BG (1991) Long-term effects of memory rehabilitation: a controlled study. Neuropsychol Rehabi 1:97–111

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broek MD van den, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N (2000) Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Injury 14:455–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bußmann BA, Hildebrandt H (1998) Rehabilitation sprachlicher Gedächtnisstörungen durch semantisches Gruppieren und die Methode des Spaced-retrieval. Neurol Rehabil 4:236

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bußmann-Mork BA, Hildebrandt H, Gießelmann H, Sachsenheimer W (2000) Behandlung mittelschwerer sprachlicher Gedächtnisstörungen: ein Vergleich mehrerer Methoden. Neurol Rehabil 6:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl G (1986) WIP-reduzierter Wechsler Intelligenztest. Königstein: Hain

  8. Doornhein K, De Haan EHF (1998) Cognitive Training for memory deficits in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabli 8:393–400

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gauggel S, Niemann T (1996) Evaluation of a short-term computer-assisted training program for the remediation of attentional deficits after brain injury: A preliminary stud International J Rehabli Res 19:229–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Butters MA (1994) Domain-specific learning and remediation of memory disorders. In: Riddoch,MJ, Humphreys GW (eds) Cognitive Neuropsychology and Cognitive Rehabilitation. Hove, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp 527–548

  11. Götte HJ, Vaterrodt T (1999) Prognostische Kriterien der Rehabilitation des Schlaganfallpatienten. Rehabilitation 38:88–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henke K, Kroll NEA, Behniea H, Amaral DG, Miller MB, Rafal R (1999) Memory lost and regained following bilateral hippocampal damage. J Cogn Neurosci 11:682–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hildebrandt H, Gießelmann G, Sachsenheimer W, Schwendemann G (2001) Topisch-neuropsychologische Diagnostik sprachlicher Gedächtnisdefizite. Fortschr NeurolPsychiatrie 69:32–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horn W (1983) Leistungsprüfsystem: LPS. Göttingen: Hogrefe

  15. Ilmberger J (1988) Deutsche Version des California Verbal Learning Tests. Unveröffentlichte Arbeit: Institut für medizinische Psychologie

  16. Ishizaki J, Meguro K, Ohe K, Kimura E, Tsuchiya E, Ishii H (2002) Therapeutic psychosocial intervention for elderly people with very mild Alzheimer Disease in a community: The Tajiri Project. Alzheimer Dis Associ Disord 16:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2002) Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Physl Mede Rehabiln 83:702–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaschel R (1994) Neuropsychologische Rehabilitation von Gedächtnisleistungen. Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie Verlags Union

  19. Kolb IA (1995) Brain Plasticity and Behavior.Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum

  20. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Mühlnickel W, Villringer K, Taub E, Flor H (1999) Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement after stroke. NeuroRepor 10:807–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Levine B, Cabeza R, McIntosh AR, Black SE, Grady CL, Stuss DT (2002) Functional reorganisation of memory after traumatic brain injury: a study with H(2)(15)0 positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Majid MJ, Lincoln NB, Weyman N (2000) Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database System Review 3:CD002293

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mateer CA, Sohlberg MM, Youngman PK (1990) The management of acquired attention and memory deficits. In:Wood RL, Fussey I (eds) Cognitive Rehabilitation in Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis, pp 68–95

  24. Matthes-v. Cramon G, Cramon DY (1995) Kognitive Rehabilitation. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 6:116–127

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E (1999) Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. A replication. Stroke 30:586–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oswald WD, Fleischmann UM (1986) Nürnberger-Alters-Inventar: NAI. Nürnberg: Oswald and Fleischmann

  27. Pulvermüller F,Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, Taub E (2001) Constraint-induced therapy of chronic Aphasia after stroke. Stroke 32:1621–1626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robertson IH, Murre JMJ (1999) Rehabilitation of brain damage: Brain plasicitiy and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull 125:544–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA (1989) Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation: Theory and practice. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thöne AIT, v. Cramon DY (1999) Gedächtnisstörungen. In: Frommelt P, Grötzbach H (eds) Neuro Rehabilitation. Berlin: Wien: Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp 293–305

  31. Unverhau S (1998) Metakognitive Gedächtnistherapie. Neurol Rehabil 4:294–300

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wechsler D (1987) WMS-R—Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised.New York: The Psychological Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Malinek V (1997) Evaluation of neuropage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 63:113–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD (1995) A Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Deutsche Übersetzung: Beckers K, Behrends U, Canavan A (1992). Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company

  35. Wilson BA (1995) Management and remediation of memory problems in brain-injured adults. In: Baddeley AD, Wilson BA, Watts FN (eds) Handbook of memory disorders. Chicester, New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp 451–480

  36. Wilson BA (1987) Rehabilitation of memory. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Hospital of Bremen-Ost, Department of Neurology, Züricher Str. 40, 28325, Bremen, Germany

    H. Hildebrandt &  G. Schwendemann

  2. University of Oldenburg Clinical and Health Psychology, 2503, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany

    H. Hildebrandt

  3. Rehabilitation Clinic of Wilhelmshaven, Department of Neurology, Bremer-Str. 2, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany

    B. Bussmann-Mork

Authors
  1. H. Hildebrandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Bussmann-Mork
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Schwendemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hildebrandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hildebrandt, H., Bussmann-Mork, B. & Schwendemann, G. Group therapy for memory impaired patients: A partial remediation is possible. J Neurol 253, 512–519 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0013-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0013-6

Key words

Search

Navigation