Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound assessment of tendons in asymptomatic volunteers: a study of reproducibility

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the inter-visit, inter-observer and intra-observer variation of quantitative and qualitative tendon examinations in vivo for a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eleven healthy male subjects were recruited. The following tendons were assessed by ultrasonography: Achilles tendon, patellar tendon, triceps tendon, extensor pollicis longus, flexor carpi radialis and supraspinatus. For each tendon a quantitative measurement of tendon size was made at a predefined anatomical location. Two experienced sonologists, blind to one another’s findings, evaluated each of the tendons independently. Each tendon was evaluated on two occasions 1 week apart. No difference was found to be attributed to variation in tendon size between visits. Inter-observer variation was a source of error with intra-subject, inter-visit measurements proving more reproducible. There was some significant variation between observers. This variation was more marked with some tendon measures than others. Inter-observer variation for triceps, flexor carpi radialis and supraspinatus was most marked. Minimum detectable change in tendons varied from 13 to 57% depending on the plane of scanning and the tendon being examined. Good reproducibility of quantitative tendon measurements can be achieved within a study using two observers by following a defined scanning protocol. However, it is recommended that the same observer perform serial assessments. The data allow minimal detectable changes in tendon size to be calculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C (2000) Sonographic imaging of tendons. Arthritis Rheum 43:969–976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Derchi LE (1999) Tendon and nerve sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 37:691–711 (viii)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Dahmane M, Pugliese F, Bianchi-Zamorani MP, Valle M (2002) Ultrasound of tendons and nerves. Eur Radiol 12:44–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Curwin SL, Stanish WD (1984) Tendinitis: its etiology and treatment. Collamore/DC Health, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  5. Riley G (2004) The pathogenesis of tendinopathy. A molecular perspective. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:131–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M, Bydder GM (2003) Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:825–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatehouse PD, Bydder GM (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. Clin Radiol 58:1–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weidekamm C, Koller M, Weber M, Kainberger F (2003) Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and Doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:325–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jozsa L, Kannus P (1997). Human tendons: anatomy, physiology, and pathology. Human Kinetics, Champlein

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kainberger F, Mittermaier F, Seidl G, Parth E, Weinstabl R (1997) Imaging of tendons—adaptation, degeneration, rupture. Eur J Radiol 25:209–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kannus P, Jozsa L (1991) Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1507–1525

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvinen M, Jozsa L, Kannus P, Jarvinen TL, Kvist M, Leadbetter W (1997) Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7:86–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvinen TA, Kannus P, Paavola M, Jarvinen TL, Jozsa L, Jarvinen M (2001) Achilles tendon injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol 13:150–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T, Grassi W, Machold KP, Swen WA, Wakefield RJ, Manger B (2001) Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60:641–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen YJ, Liang SC (1997) Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography in stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: sonographic-surgical correlation. J Ultrasound Med 16:417–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rand T, Bindeus T, Alton K, Voegele T, Kukla C, Stanek C, Imhof H (1998) Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (0.2 T) of tendons with sonographic and histologic correlation. Cadaveric study. Invest Radiol 33:433–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockett MS, Waitches G, Sudakoff G, Brage M (1998) Use of ultrasonography versus magnetic resonance imaging for tendon abnormalities around the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 19:604–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waitches GM, Rockett M, Brage M, Sudakoff G (1998) Ultrasonographic-surgical correlation of ankle tendon tears. J Ultrasound Med 17:249–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fornage BD (1986) Achilles tendon: US examination. Radiology 159:759–764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koivunen-Niemela T, Parkkola K (1995) Anatomy of the Achilles tendon (tendo calcaneus) with respect to tendon thickness measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 17:263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Astrom M, Gentz CF, Nilsson P, Rausing A, Sjoberg S, Westlin N (1996) Imaging in chronic achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skeletal Radiol 25:615–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soila K, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Pihlajamaki HK, Tirman PJ (1999) High-resolution MR imaging of the asymptomatic Achilles tendon: new observations. Am J Roentgenol 173:323–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kainberger FM, Engel A, Barton P, Huebsch P, Neuhold A, Salomonowitz E (1990) Injury of the Achilles tendon: diagnosis with sonography. Am J Roentgenol 155:1031–1036

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ying M, Yeung E, Li B, Li W, Lui M, Tsoi CW (2003) Sonographic evaluation of the size of Achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:637–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards PJ, Dheer AK, McCall IM (2001) Achilles tendon (TA) size and power Doppler ultrasound (PD) changes compared to MRI: a preliminary observational study. Clin Radiol 56:843–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Civeira F, Castillo JJ, Calvo C, Ferrando J, de Pedro C, Martinez-Rodes P, Pocovi M (1998) Achilles tendon size by high resolution sonography in healthy population. Relationship with lipid levels. Med Clin (Barc) 111:41–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Leotta DF, Martin RW (2000) Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff: spatial compounding and tendon thickness measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol 26:509–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pickersgill CH, Marr CM, Reid SW (2001) Repeatability of diagnostic ultrasonography in the assessment of the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Equine Vet J 33:33–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Grainger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connor, P.J., Grainger, A.J., Morgan, S.R. et al. Ultrasound assessment of tendons in asymptomatic volunteers: a study of reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14, 1968–1973 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2448-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2448-4

Keywords

Navigation