Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic and environmental influences on bone mineral density in pre- and post-menopausal women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic factors influencing acquisition of peak bone mass account for a substantial proportion of the variation in bone mineral density (BMD), although the extent to which genes also contribute to variation in bone loss is debatable. Few prospective studies of related individuals have been carried out to address this issue. To gain insights into the nature of the genetic factors contributing to variation in BMD, we studied 570 women from large Amish families. We evaluated and compared the genetic contributions to BMD in pre- and post-menopausal women, with the rationale that genetic variation in pre-menopausal women is due primarily to genetic determinants of peak bone mass, while genetic variation in post-menopausal women is due to the combined genetic effects of peak bone mass and bone loss. Bone mineral density was measured at one point in time at the hip and spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We used variance decomposition procedures to partition variation in BMD into genetic and environmental effects common to both groups and to pre- and post-menopausal women separately. Total variation in BMD was higher in post- compared to pre-menopausal women. Genes accounted for 58–88% of the total variation in BMD in pre-menopausal women compared to 37–54% of the total variation in post-menopausal women. In absolute terms, however, the genetic variance was approximately similar between the two groups because the environmental variance was 3 1/2- to 4-fold larger in the post-menopausal group. The genetic correlation in total hip BMD was 0.81 between pre- and post-menopausal women and differed significantly from one, consistent with the presence of at least some non-overlapping genetic effects in the two groups for BMD at this site. Overall, these analyses suggest that many, but not all, of the genetic factors influencing variation in BMD are common to both pre- and post-menopausal women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, Jr et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (see comments). Lancet 341:72–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7:407–413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindsay R, Cosman F, Herrington BS et al (1992) Bone mass and body composition in normal women. J Bone Miner Res 7:55–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elders PJ, Netelenbos JC, Lips P et al (1988) Accelerated vertebral bone loss in relation to the menopause: a cross-sectional study on lumbar bone density in 286 women of 46 to 55 years of age. Bone Miner 5:11–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter DJ, Sambrook PN (2000) Bone loss: epidemiology of bone loss. Arthritis Res 2:441–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Rodbro P (1987) Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women. Lancet 1:1105–1108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riis BJ (1995) The role of bone loss. Am J Med 98:29S–32S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisman JA (1999) Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 20:788–804

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Christian JC, Yu PL, Slemenda CW et al (1989) Heritability of bone mass: a longitudinal study in aging male twins. Am J Hum Genet 44:429–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Hopper JL et al (1987) Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study. J Clin Invest 80:706–710

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA et al (1989) Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 320:554–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jouanny P, Guillemin F, Kuntz C et al (1995) Environmental and genetic factors affecting bone mass. Similarity of bone density among members of healthy families. Arthritis Rheum 38:61–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matkovic V, Fontana D, Tominac C et al (1990) Factors that influence peak bone mass formation: a study of calcium balance and the inheritance of bone mass in adolescent females. Am J Clin Nutr 52:878–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrari S, Rizzoli R, Slosman D et al (1998) Familial resemblance for bone mineral mass is expressed before puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:358–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lutz J (1986) Bone mineral, serum calcium, and dietary intakes of mother/daughter pairs. Am J Clin Nutr 44:99–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krall EA, Dawson-Hughes B (1993) Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 8:1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prentice A (2001) The relative contribution of diet and genotype to bone development. Proc Nutr Soc 60:45–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Seeman E, Tsalamandris C, Formica C et al (1994) Reduced femoral neck bone density in the daughters of women with hip fractures: the role of low peak bone density in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:739–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Ferrell RE (1999) Recent progress in understanding the genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis. Genet Epidemiol 16:356–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly PJ, Nguyen T, Hopper J et al (1993) Changes in axial bone density with age: a twin study. J Bone Miner Res 8:11–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown LB, Streeten EA, Shuldiner AR et al (2004) Assessment of sex-specific genetic and environmental effects on bone mineral density. Genet Epidemiol 27:153–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Streeten EA, McBride DJ, Lodge AL et al (2004) Reduced incidence of hip fracture in the Old Order Amish. J Bone Miner Res 19:308–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beiler K (1988) Fisher family history: descendants and history of Christian Fisher (1757–1838). Ronk’s, Eby’s Quality Printing, PA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agarwala R, Biesecker LG, Hopkins KA et al (1998) Software for constructing and verifying pedigrees within large genealogies and an application to the Old Order Amish of Lancaster County. Genome Res 8:211–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Agarwala R, Schäffer AA, Tomlin JF (2001) Towards a complete North American Anabaptist Genealogy II: Analysis of inbreeding. Hum Biol 73:533–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Almasy L, Blangero J (1998) Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 62:1198–1211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blangero J (1993) Statistical genetic approaches to human adaptability. Hum Biol 65:941–966

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin LJ, Mahaney MC, Almasy L et al (2002) Leptin’s sexual dimorphism results from genotype by sex interactions mediated by testosterone. Obes Res 10:14–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1994) Quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Essex, England

  32. Self SG, Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under non-standard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82:605–610

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell BD, Kammerer CM, Schneider JL et al (2003) Genetic and environmental determinants of bone mineral density in Mexican Americans: results from the San Antonio Family Osteoporosis Study. Bone 33:839–846

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grants R01-AR46838, R01-AG18728, R01-HL69313 and U01-HL72515 awarded by the National Institutes of Health, and the University of Maryland General Clinical Research Center, Grant M01 RR165001, General Clinical Research Centers Program, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Braxton D. Mitchell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, L.B., Streeten, E.A., Shapiro, J.R. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on bone mineral density in pre- and post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16, 1849–1856 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1948-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1948-7

Keywords

Navigation