Abstract
Objective
To assess the determinants for satisfaction of cancer patients’ family members with the intensive care unit.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
A 13-bed intensive care unit in a tertiary cancer centre.
Patients and participants
164 families of consecutive patients with a length of stay greater than 48 h.
Intervention
None.
Measurement
A modified version of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory was applied and compared with the families’ perception of prognosis, previous information given to them, and patients’ severity of disease (SAPS).
Results
The median score of the questionnaire was 11 (2–14), and the cut-off for satisfaction was established at 9 (1st quartile). SAPS >41 was associated with lower satisfaction [(p<0.05, chi-square, OR 2.49 (CI 1.1–5.4)]. When those interviewed surmised a prognosis different from the final outcome [p<0.05, chi-square, OR 2.70 (1.2–6.0)], a significant association with dissatisfaction was found.
Conclusion
More discussion about prognosis may improve the level of satisfaction of cancer patients’ family members with the intensive care unit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kress JP, Christenson J, Pohlman AS, Linkin DR, Hall JB (1999) Outcomes of critically ill cancer patients in a university hospital setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1957–1961
Staudinger T, Stoiser B, Mullner M, Locker GJ, Laczika K, Knapp S, Burgmann H, Wilfing A, Kofler J, Thalhammer F, Frass F ( 2000) Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 28:1322–1328
Studnicki J, Schapira DV, Straumfjord JV, Clark RA, Marshburn J, Werner DC (1994) A national profile of the use of intensive care by Medicare patients with cancer. Cancer 74:2366–2373
Molter NC (1979) Needs of relatives of critically ill patients: a descriptive study. Heart Lung 8:332–339
Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O (1998) Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 26:266–271
Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Konopad E, Cook DJ, Peters S, Tranmer JE, O’Callaghan CJ (2002) Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med 30:1413–1418
Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Mokhtari M, Le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B; French FAMIREA Group (2001) Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:135–139
Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Jourdain M, Bornstain C, Wernet A, Cattaneo I, Annane D, Brun F, Bollaert PE, Zahar JR, Gldgran-Toledano D, Adrie C, Joly LM, Tayoro J, Desmettre T, Pigne E, Parrot A, Sanchez O, Poisson C, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B, Lemaire F (2002) Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:438–442
Wasser T, Pasquale MA, Matchett SC, Bryan Y, Pasquale M (2001) Establishing reliability and validity of the critical care family satisfaction survey. Crit Care Med 29:192–196
Heyland DK, Tranmer JE, Kingston General Hospital ICU Research Working Group (2001) Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. J Crit Care 16:142–149
Deheinzelin D, Nishimoto IN, Fumis RLL (2004) Determinants of family satisfaction with the intensive care unit. A prospective study Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:A39
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191
Azoulay E., Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, Canoui P, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2000) Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 28: 3044–3049
Burns JP, Mello MM, Studdert DM, Puopolo AL, Truog RD, Brennan TA (2003) Results of a clinical trial on care improvement for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 31:2107–2117
Bernat Adell MD, Tejedor Lopez R, Sanchis Munoz J (2000) How well do patients’ relatives evaluate and understand information provided by the intensive care unit? Enferm Intensiva 11:3–9
Bland J M, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J 314:572
The SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598
Malacrida R, Bettelini CM, Degrate A, Martinez M, Badia F, Piazza J, Vizzardi N, Wullshleger R, Rapin CH (1998) Reasons for dissatisfaction: a survey of relatives of intensive care patients who died. Crit Care Med 26:1187–1193
Myhren H, Ekeberg O, Langen I, Stokland O (2004) Emotional strain, communication, and satisfaction of family members in the intensive care unit compared with expectations of the medical staff: experiences from a Norwegian University Hospital. Intensive Care Med 30:1791–1798
Hickey M (1990) What are the needs of families of critically ill patients? A review of the literature since 1976. Heart Lung 19:401−415
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rego Lins Fumis, R., Nishimoto, I.N. & Deheinzelin, D. Measuring satisfaction in family members of critically ill cancer patients in Brazil. Intensive Care Med 32, 124–128 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2857-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2857-0