Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of differing social ties on decline in physical functioning among older people with and without chronic diseases: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

  • New Section on Longitudinal Studies
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Global social support measures have been shown to be related to several health outcomes. However, little is known about the effects of differing social ties and their support on the risk for decline in physical functioning among older people, without as compared with those with chronic diseases. This study examines whether differing types of social ties and support differentially mitigate the negative effects of chronic diseases on decline in physical functioning. Methods: Using data from two cycles of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N=2357), logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline functioning, age, gender, and incidence of chronic diseases were conducted, to assess the effect of differing social ties for subgroups with different numbers of chronic diseases. Information about the presence of differing social ties included partner status and numbers of daughters, sons, other family members, and non-kin relationships. Social support included instrumental and emotional support, and the experience of loneliness. Decline in physical functioning was determined by substantial change after three years on a 6-item self-report scale. Results: Although having a partner had a protective effect on decline in physical functioning in people without chronic diseases at baseline, this was not the case for those with chronic diseases. Total network size had an adverse effect in older people without chronic diseases, but a positive effect when chronic diseases were present, mainly due to a positive effect of the number of daughters and non-kin relationships. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that differing types of social relationships and the support they provide, differentially influence decline in physical functioning in older people, with or without chronic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guralnik JM, Lacroix AZ, Abbott RD, et al. Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 845–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boult C, Kane RL, Louis TA, Boult L, McCaffrey D. Chronic conditions that lead to functional limitation in the elderly. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M28–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kempen GI, Ormel J, Brilman EI, Relyveld J. Adaptive responses among Dutch elderly: the impact of eight chronic medical conditions on health-related quality of life. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark DO, Stump TE, Hui SL, Wolinsky FD. Predictors of mobility and basic ADL difficulty among adults aged 70 years and older. J Aging Health 1998; 10: 422–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho CY, Alessi CA, Cho M, et al. The association between chronic illness and functional change among participants in a comprehensive geriatric assessment program. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 677–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornoni-Huntley JC, Foley DJ, Guralnik JM. Co-morbidity analysis: a strategy for understanding mortality, disability and use of health care facility of older people. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20 (Sup-pl. 1): S8–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verbrugge LM, Lepkowski JM, Imanaka Y. Comorbidity and its impact on disability. Milbank Q. 1989; 67: 450–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guralnik JM, Lacroix AZ, Everett DF. Comorbidity of chronic conditions and disability among older persons — United States, 1984. JAMA 1990; 263: 209–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mor V, Wilcox V, Rakowski W, Hiris J. Functional transitions among the elderly: patterns, predictors and related hospital use. Am J Public Health 1984; 84: 1274–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 445–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA. Successful aging: predictors and associated activities. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 144: 135–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendes de Leon CF, Gold DT, Glass TA, Kaplan L, George LK. Disability as a function of social networks and support in elderly African Americans and Whites: the Duke EPESE 1986–1992. J Gerontol 2001; 56: S179–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, Beckett LA, Seeman TE, Evans DA, Berkman LF. Social networks and disability transitions across eight intervals of yearly data in the New Haven EPESE. J Gerontol 1999; 54B: S162–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Unger JB, Johnson CA, Marks G. Functional decline in the elderly: evidence for direct and stress-buffering protective effects of social interactions and physical activity. Ann Behav Med 1997; 19: 152–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Unger JB, McAvay G, Bruce ML, Berkman L, Seeman T. Variation in the impact of social network characteristics on physical functioning in elderly persons: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J Gerontol 1999; 54B: S245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull 1995; 98: 310–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen S, Syme SL. Issues in the study and application of social support. In Cohen S, Syme SL, Eds. Social support and health. Orlando: Academic Press Inc., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwarzer R, Leppin A. Social support and health: a metaanalysis. Psychol Health 1989; 3: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarzer R, Leppin A. Social support and health: a theoretical and empirical overview. J Soc Pers Relat 1991; 8: 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Penninx BWJH, van Tilburg TG, Boeke AJP, Deeg DJH, Kriegsman DMW, van Eijk JThM. Effects of social support and personal coping resources on depressive symptoms: different for various chronic diseases? Health Psychol 1998; 17: 551–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Penninx BWJH, van Tilburg TG, Deeg DJH, Kriegsman DMW, Boeke AJP, van Eijk JThM. Direct and buffer effects of social support and personal coping resources in individuals with arthritis. Soc Sci Med 1997a; 44: 393–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Seeman TE. Health promoting effects of friends and family on health outcomes in older adults. Am J Health Promot 2000; 14: 362–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berkman LF, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109: 186–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL. The association of social relationships and activity with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116: 123–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seeman TE, Kaplan GA, Knudsen L, Cohen R, Guralnik J. Social network ties and mortality among the elderly in the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 714–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Penninx BWJH, van Tilburg TG, Kriegsman DMW, Deeg DJH, Boeke AJP, van Eijk JThM. Effects of social support and personal coping resources on mortality in older age: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Am J Epidemiol 1997b; 146: 510–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherbourne CD, Hays RD. Marital status, social support, and health transitions in chronic disease patients. J Health Soc Behav 1990; 31: 328–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hyduk CA. The dynamic relationship between social support and health in older adults: assessment implications. J Gerontol 1996; 27: 149–65.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kriegsman DMW, van Eijk JThM, Penninx BWJH, Deeg DJH, Boeke AJP. Does family support buffer the impact of specific chronic diseases on mobility in community-dwelling elderly? Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 71–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smit JH, de Vries MZ. Procedures and results of the field work. In Deeg DJH, Westendorp-de Serière M, Eds. Autonomy and well-being in the aging population: Report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam 1992–1993. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1994: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Broese van Groenou M, van Tilburg TG, de Leeuw E, Liefbroer AC. Data collection. In Knipscheer CPM, de Jong Gierveld J, van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA, Eds. Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995: 185–97.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Sonsbeek JLA. Methodological and substantial aspects of the OECD indicator of chronic functional limitations. Maand-bericht Gezondheid (CBS) 1988; 88: 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kriegsman DMW, Penninx BWJH, van Eijk JThM, Boeke AJP, Deeg DJH. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly: A study on the accuracy of patients’ self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1407–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cochran M, Larner M, Riley D, Gunnarson L, Henderson CR. Extending families: The social networks of parents and their children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Van Tilburg TG, de Leeuw ED. Stability of scale quality under various data collection procedures: a mode comparison of the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. Int J Publ Opin Res 1991; 3: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Tilburg TG. Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. In Knipscheer CPM, de Jong-Gierveld J, van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA, Eds. Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perlman D, Peplau LA. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In Duck S, Gilmour R, Eds. Personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic Press, 1981: 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  39. De Jong-Gierveld J, Kamphuis FH. The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Appl Psychol Meas 1985; 9: 289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Tilburg TG. Losing and gaining in old age: changes in personal network size and social support in a four-year longitudinal study. J Gerontol. 1998; 53: S313–23.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cronbach LJ. Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychol Bull 1987; 102: 414–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6: 442–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Broese van Groenou M, Knipscheer CPM. Onset of physical impairment of independently living older adults and the support received from sons and daughters in the Netherlands. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1999; 48: 263–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. Isabella Bisschop, Didi M. W. Kriegsman & Dorly J. H. Deeg

  2. Department of General Practice, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Didi M. W. Kriegsman

  3. Department of Sociology and Social Gerontology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Theo G. van Tilburg

  4. Sticht Center on Aging, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Brenda W. J. H. Penninx

  5. Department of Medical Sociology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht

    Jacques Th. M. van Eijk

  6. Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Dorly J. H. Deeg

Authors
  1. M. Isabella Bisschop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Didi M. W. Kriegsman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Theo G. van Tilburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jacques Th. M. van Eijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dorly J. H. Deeg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Isabella Bisschop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisschop, M.I., Kriegsman, D.M.W., van Tilburg, T.G. et al. The influence of differing social ties on decline in physical functioning among older people with and without chronic diseases: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res 15, 164–173 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324496

Key words

Search

Navigation