Abstract
Objective. Our objective was to find out what is discussed during a bedside morning ward round (MWR), whether there are any weak points, and if a standard work process structure can be recommended.Methods. An intensive care unit (ICU) consultant recorded in a predefined form the topics that were discussed in 225 bedside discussions.Results. The median length of discussions was 5 min. In more than 60% of the discussions, items were considered related to the respiratory, neurological, and cardiovascular systems, as well as to surgical and nursing problems. Specific variables relating to organ system conditions were seldom used (e.g., inspired O2 concentration, 35%; temperature, 28%; ventilation mode, 25%). We recorded two interruptions per MWR; only 17% of them were related to urgent decisions. Information that could not be found in the patient’s file usually concerned microbiology findings (10%) or surgical procedures (6%).Conclusions. We recommend the following structure: (1) Addressing the patient by saying “hello”; (2) presentation of information related to case history, acute status (findings and strategy) (including the function of the main organ systems), infection status, and nursing problems; (3) patient-related discussion; and (4) discussion of general treatment rules, triggered by individual patient condition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shamse SJ, Clark JE. Effectiveness of ward meetings. Can Psychiatr Assoc J 1971; 16: 217–222
Fewtrell WD, Toms DA. Pattern of discussion in traditional and novel ward-round procedures. Br J Med Psy-chol 1985; 58: 57–62
Carson R, Whitcurry R. Ethics teaching on ward rounds. J Fam Prac 1980; ll: 59–63
Hochenegg L. Die psychiatrische Visite. Therapiewoche 1976; 26: 2484–2489
Saunders SJ. The effects of ward rounds on patients. SA Nurs J 1977; 44: 27
Bradshaw KF, Gardner RM, Clemmer TP, et al. Physician decision making. Evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. Int J Clin Monk Comp 1984; 1: 81–91
Kupermann GJ, Gardner RM, Allan Pryor T. The HELP system in Intensive Care Units. In: Kupermann GJ, Gardner RM, Allan Pryor T, eds. HELP: A Dynamic Hospital Information System. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991: 125–128
Roberts R, Renzaglia G. The influence of tape recording on counseling. J Counsel Psychol 1965; 12: 10–16
Kazdin A. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: The ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal 1977; 10: 141–150
Friesdorf W, Schwilk B. Patient-related da,ta management. J Clin Monit 1992; 8: 308–314
Friesdorf W, Schwilk B, Fattroth A, et al. Arbeitswis-senschaftliche Analyse der ärztlichen Tätigkeit in der Vor-mittagsroutine einer Intensivstation. Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin 1993, in press
Rasmussen J. Information processing and human-machine interaction. North-Holland series in system science and engineering; 12. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co, 1986: 101
Evans DA, Gadd CS. Managing coherence and context in medical problem-solving discourse. In: Evans DA, Patel VL, eds. Cognitive science in medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988: 211–256
Friesdorf W, Schwilk B. Patient data management. In: Ikeda K, Avi M, Kazama T, Sato K, Oyama T, eds. Computing and monitoring in anesthesia and intensive care, recent technological advances. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1992: 161–175
Tecklenburg AC. Documentation in intensive care—a case for hypermedia? Proceeding of the first annual meeting. Goldegg (Salzburg), Austria: European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), 1990
Rasmussen J. A framework for cognitive task analysis in system design. In: Holnagel H, Mancini G, Woods D, eds. Intelligent decision support in process environments. New York: Springer, 1986: 175–196
Mitchell CHM, Saisi DL. Use of model-based qualitative icons and adaptive windows in workstations for supervisory control systems. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybernet SMC-17 1987; 4: 573–592
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work is part of the TANIT, an AIM project supported by the European Community. It has been partially supported by funds provided by our industrial partners (Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck, B. Braun Medical, Melsungen, and PPG-Hellige, Freiburg).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friesdorf, W., Konichezky, S., Gross-Alltag, F. et al. System ergonomic analysis of the morning ward round in an intensive care unit. J Clin Monitor Comput 10, 201–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908862
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908862