Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The routine use of health-related quality of life measures in the care of patients with epilepsy: rationale and research agenda

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reliable and valid patient-completed questionnaires to assess the health related quality of life (HRQOL) of people with epilepsy are becoming increasingly available. At present, however, they are not routinely used in epilepsy patients' care. The use of HRQOL measurement in clinical practice settings may improve the quality of care for people with epilepsy through (1) increasing the detection of patients' problems with daily functioning and well-being: (2) guiding therapeutic management; and (3) leading to improvements in patients' HRQOL and satisfaction with care. To realize the potential benefits of HRQOL assessment in the care of people with epilepsy, research into the feasibility of the office-based use of HRQOL questionnaires, measurement quality, and the impact of routine HRQOL assessment on the quality of epilepsy patients' care needs to be undertaken. The transfer of HRQOL questionnaires from research tools into clinical tools requires the collaboration of social scientists, health services researchers, and clinicians. HRQOL questionnaires have the potential to become a new clinical tool which could enhance the quality of care physicians are able to provide for their patients with epilepsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellwood PM. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience.N Engl J Med 1988;318: 1549–1556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermann BP. Quality of life in epilepsy.J Epilepsy 1992;5: 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Graber J, Rausch R, Engel J, Brook RH. A health-related quality of life instrument for patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery.Med Care 1992;30: 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker GA, Smith DF, Dewey M, Jacoby A, Chadwick DW. The initial development of a health-related quality of life model as an outcome measure in epilepsy.Epilepsy Res 1993;16: 65–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Devinsky O, Vickrey BG, Cramer JAet al. Development of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE)-89 Inventory. Submitted.

  6. Vickrey BG, Perrine KR, Hays RDet al. Scoring Manual for the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE)-89. RAND. 1993.

  7. Wagner AK, Keller SD, Kosinski Met al. Advances in methods for assessing the impact of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy on patients' health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research 1994.

  8. Rubenstein L. The clinical effectiveness of multidimensional geriatric assessment.J Am Geriatrics Soc 1983;31: 758–762.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Almy TP. Comprehensive functional assessment for elderly patients.Ann Intern Med 1988;10: 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schor EL, Lerner DJ, Malspeis S. Physician's assessment of functional health status and well-being: The patient's perspective.Arch Intern Med in press.

  11. Brody DS. Physician recognition of behavioural, psychological, and social aspects of medical care.Arch Intern Med 1980;140: 1286–1289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart MA, Buck CW. Physicians knowledge and response to patients' problems.Med Care 1977;15: 578–585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nelson E, Conger B, Douglass R, et al. Functional health status levels of primary care patients.JAMA 1983;249: 3331–3338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wartman SA, Morlock LL, Malitz FE, Palm E. Impact of divergent evaluations of physicians and patients of patients' complaints.Public Health Rep 1983;98: 141–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, et al. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients.Ann Intern Med 1991;114: 451–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells KB, Hays RD, Burnam MA, et al. Detection of depressive disorders for patients receiving prepaid or fee-for-service care: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.JAMA 1989;262: 3298–3302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE, Manning WG, Duan N, Wells KB, Newhouse JP. Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services.Am Psychol 1984;39: 1090–1100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittan RJ. Fear of seizures. In: Whitman S, Hermann BP (eds).Psychopathology in Epilepsy. Social Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roper Organization.Living with epilepsy. Report of a Roper Poll of Patients on Quality of Life. New York: The Roper Organization, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM. Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?Br J Cancer 1988;57: 109–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nerenz DR, Repasky DP, Whitehouse FW, Kahkonen DM. Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus.Med Care 1992;30: MS112-MS124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer KB, Espindle DM, DeGiacomo JM, Jenuelson CS, Kurtin PS, Davies AR. Monitoring dialysis patients' health status.Am J Kidney Dis 1994;24: 267–279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson ED, Landgraf, Hays RD, Wasson JH, Kirk JW. The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians' offices?Med Care 1990;28: 1111–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leppik IE. Compliance in the treatment of epilepsy. In: Wyllie E, ed.The Treatment of Epilepsy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1993; 810–816.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson GM, McLean S, Millingen KS. Determinants of patient compliance with antiepileptic drug therapy.Epilepsia 1982;23: 607–613.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cramer JA, Scheyer RD, Mattson RH. Compliance declines between clinic visits.Arch Intern Med 1990;150: 1509–1510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang MH. Compliance and quality of life: Confessions of a difficult patient.Arthritis Care Res 1989;2: S71-S74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cramer JA. Quality of life and compliance. In: Trimble MR, Dodson WE, eds.Epilepsy and Quality of Life. New York: Raven Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trostle JA, Hauser WA, Susser IS. The logic of noncompliance: Management of epilepsy from the patient's point of view.Culture Med Psychiatry 1983;7: 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brody D. The patient's role in clinical decision making.Ann Intern Med 80;93: 718–722.

  31. Betts T. Epilepsy services. What people need, what they want, what they get.Acta Neurol Scand 1992;140 (Suppl.): 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gibson PA. Update on epilepsy: Psychosocial issues.J Clin Res Pharmacoepidemiol 1991;5: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rayport M, Feka R, Rogelson MH, et al. Minimum care standards for epilepsy for Ohio.Ohio Med 1990;86: 796–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cereghino JJ, Cole CH. A multidisciplinary approach to services for the epileptic.HSMHA Health Rep 1971;86: 355–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cereghino JJ, Penry JK, Smith LD. Comprehensive epilepsy programs in the United States. In: Canger R, Angeleri F, Penry JK, eds.Advances in Epileptology: XIth Epilepsy International Symposium. New York: Raven Press, 1980: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The National Association of Epilepsy Centers. Recommended guidelines for diagnosis and treatment in specialized epilepsy centers.Epilepsia 1990;31: S1-S2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gumnit RJ, Jacome D, Ramani V, Johnston J, Reuben S, Whalen S. Comprehensive treatment of intractable seizures. In: Wada JA, Penry JK, eds.Advances in Epileptology: The Xth Epilepsy International Symposium, New York: Raven Press, 1980: 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rubenstein LV, Calkins DR, Young RT, et al. Improving patient function: A randomized trial of functional disability screening.Ann Intern Med 1989;111: 836–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kazis LE, Callaghan LF, Meenan RF, Pincus T. Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43: 1243–1253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, et al. The COOP Function Charts: A system to measure patient function in physicians' offices. In: WONCA Classification Committee.Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rubenstein LV, McCoy JM, Cope DW, et al. Improving patient functional status: A randomized trial of computer-generated resource and management suggestions.Clin Res 1989;37: 801A.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jacoby A. Quality of life and care in epilepsy. In: Chadwick DW, Baker GA, Jacoby A, eds.Quality of Life and Quality of Care in Epilepsy: Update 1993. New York: Royal Society of Medicine, 1993: 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B.SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Response Technologies, Inc.The RT-2000 Immediate Reponse Terminal. Operating Instruction. East Greenwich, RI: Response Technologies, Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Roizen MF, Coalson D, Hayword RSA, et al. Can patients use an automated questionnaire to define their current health status?Med Care 1992;30: MS74-MS84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Trimble MR. Cognitive hazards of seizures disorders.Epilepsia 1988:29 (Suppl. I): S19-S24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hays R, Vickrey BG, Hermann B, et al. Agreement between self- and proxy reports of health-related quality of life in epilepsy.Qual Life Res 1994;4: 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 369–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ware JE, Gandek BG, and the IQOLA Project Group. The SF-36 Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project.Int J Ment Health 1994;23: 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care 1992;30: 473–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jette AM, Cleary PD. Functional disability assessment.Phys Ther 1987:67: 1854–1859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wasson JH, Keller A, Rubenstein L, et al. Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment measures in ambulatory settings: The clinician's point of view.Med Care 1992:30: MS42-MS49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Golden WE. Health status measurement: implementation strategies.Med Care 1992;30: MS187-MS195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nunnally J.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 441–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Prisant LM, Carr AA, Bottini BP, et al. Repeatability of automated ambulatory blood pressure measurements.J Fam Pract 1992;34: 596–574.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wagner AK, Bungay KM, Bromfield EB, Ehrenberg BL. Health-related quality of life of adult people with epilepsy compared with the health-related quality of life of well people.Epilepsia 1993;34 (Suppl 6): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Rausch R, Engel J Jr, Sutherling W, Brook RH. Quality of life of epilepsy surgery patients compared to outpatients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and/or depressive symptoms.Epilepsia 1994;35: 597–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hermann B, Vickrey BG, Hays RD,et al. Quality of life in epilepsy: Comparisons to patients with diabetes and multiple sclerosis. In preparation.

  60. Lohr KN. Applications of health status measures in clinical practice. Overview of the Third Conference on Advances in Health Status Assessment.Med Care 1992;30: MS1-MS14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Box 345, 750, Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111

    A. K. Wagner

  2. Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    B. G. Vickrey

Authors
  1. A. K. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. G. Vickrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, A.K., Vickrey, B.G. The routine use of health-related quality of life measures in the care of patients with epilepsy: rationale and research agenda. Qual Life Res 4, 169–177 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833610

Key words

Search

Navigation