Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of information, behavioral rehearsal, and prompting on breast self-exams

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of three approaches to increasing breast self-exam frequency in college-aged women. Program components included (1) an educational format which provided informationon breast cancer and breast self-examinations, (2) a demonstrationformat where examinations were demonstrated and practiced, and (3) a promptformat where subjects received monthly reminders to self-examine. Components were completely crossed in a factorial design with four assessment periods (pretreatment and 1, 3, and 6 months posttreatment). The results showed that the examination frequency increased over time and was significantly higher in the prompt conditions. Information and demonstration programs did not increase the exam frequency. The frequency also increased in the control group, suggesting that assessments may have also prompted the behavior. Implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alagna, S. W., and Reddy, D. M. (1984). Predictor of proficient technique and successful lesion detection in breast self-examination.Health Psychol. 3: 113–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer Society (1964).Cancer Facts for Women, American Cancer Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer Society (1975).How to Examine Your Breasts, American Cancer Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer Society (1978).Facts on Breast Cancer, American Cancer Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer society (1982).Cancer Facts and Figures, American Cancer Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M., Michalek, A., Bersani, G., Nernoto, T., and Mettlin, C. (1981). Effectiveness of a community program to promote early breast cancer detection.J. Surg. Onocol. 18: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craun, A. M., and Deffenbacher, J. L. (1981). Cancer knowledge and examination frequency in college students.J. Am. Coll. Health Assoc. 30: 123–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, R., Shapiro, S., and Lewison, J. (1968). The reluctant participant in a breast cancer screening program.Publ. Health Rep. 83: 479–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, S., O'Malley, M., and Bunce, L. (1985). Physician's abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models.JAMA 253: 2224–2228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. S., Lang, S. P., Costanza, M. C., Worden, J. K., Haines, C. R., and Yates, J. W. (1978). Breast self-examination practices and cancer stage.New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 265–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Organization (1974).Women's Attitudes Regarding Breast Cancer, American Cancer Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, K. E. (1984). Cue enhancement and the long-term practice of breast self-examination.J. Behav. Med. 7: 191–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, D. P., and Kirscht, J. P. (1970). Motivational and behavioral effects of modifying health beliefs.Publ. Health Rep. 85: 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallal, J. C. (1982). The relationship of health beliefs, health locus of control, and self-concept to the practice of breast self-examinations in adult women.Nurs. Res. 31: 137–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H. L. (1981). Enhancing the effectiveness of media messages promoting regular breast self-examinations.Publ. Health Rep. 96: 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguley, C., and Brown, R. (1981). The value of breast self-examinations.Cancer 47: 989–995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kegeles, S. S., Kirscht, J. P., Haefner, D. P., and Rosenstock, I. M. (1965). Survey of beliefs about cancer detection and taking Papanicolaou tests.Publ. Health Rep. 80: 815–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (1980).Breast Cancer: A Measure of Progress in Public Understanding, NIH Publ. No. 81-2291, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model.Health Educ. Monogr. 2: 328–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, M. J. (1977). Women's beliefs about breast cancer and breast self-examination.Nurs. Res. 26: 121–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, R. A., Kronenfeld, J. J. Ory, M. G., and Kilgo, J. S. (1980). Method and design issues in evaluation of community health education programs: A case study in breast and cervical cancer.Health Educ. Q. 7: 203–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on the first author's dissertation, which was supervised by the second author and submitted to Colorado State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree. The authors wish to thank the members of the dissertation committee, Larry Bloom, William Boyer, Ruth Rumley, and Robert Titley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craun, A.M., Deffenbacher, J.L. The effects of information, behavioral rehearsal, and prompting on breast self-exams. J Behav Med 10, 351–365 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846475

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00846475

Key words

Navigation