Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 31, Issue 5, November 2000, Pages 494-505
Preventive Medicine

Regular Article
Characteristics of Exercise Behavior among College Students: Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Predicting Stage of Change,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2000.0736Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Young adulthood is characterized by a steep decline in the level of physical activity, but few theory-based studies have examined characteristics associated with regular exercise in this population. This study applied Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the Stages of Change Model (SCM) to determine personal, behavioral, and environmental characteristics associated with exercise behavior and intentions among undergraduate university students.

Methods. A random sample of 937 undergraduate students (mean age 22.0 ± 5.6 years; 84.7% ages 17–24 years) enrolled at a large Midwestern university completed a mailed questionnaire. Valid and reliable instruments were used to measure personal, behavioral, and environmental variables based on the SCT that were hypothesized to influence stage of exercise behavior change. Multivariate discriminant analysis was used to determine associations among these variables with stage of exercise behavior change.

Results. Exercise self-efficacy, physical activity history, and nonexercise estimation of aerobic capacity were significant predictors of the stage of exercise behavior change for both males and females. Among females, exercise self-efficacy (P < 0.001) and family social support (P < 0.001) for physical activity were the best predictors of stage of exercise behavior change. Friend social support (P < 0.001), physical activity history (P < 0.001), and exercise self-efficacy (P < 0.001) were significant predictors of stage of exercise behavior change among males.

Conclusions. The SCT framework predicted stage of exercise behavior change as defined by the SCM. Exercise self-efficacy was associated with exercise stage, but the source of significant social support (family versus friends) was different for males and females.

References (43)

  • T Stephens et al.

    The descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity

    Public Health Rep

    (1985)
  • KA Douglas et al.

    Results from the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey

    J Am Coll Health

    (19970)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention...
  • E Leslie et al.

    Inactive Australian college students' preferred activities, sources of assistance, and motivators

    Am J Health Promot

    (1999)
  • RK Dishman

    The measurement conundrum in exercise adherence research

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1994)
  • J Buckworth et al.

    Determinants of physical activity: research to application

  • Bandura, A, Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall,...
  • T Baranowski et al.

    How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact

  • JO Prochaska et al.

    Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: towards an integrative model of change

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1983)
  • JE Maddux

    Social cognitive models of health and exercise behavior: an introduction and review of conceptual issues

    J Appl Sport Psychol

    (1993)
  • J Wyse et al.

    Evidence for the validity and reliability of the stages of exercise behaviour change scale in young adults

    Health Educ Res

    (1995)
  • Cited by (160)

    • Psychological mechanisms underlying the relationship between commercial physical activity app use and physical activity engagement

      2020, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, self-efficacy also mediated the positive effect of sharing posts on physical activity. This suggests that specific features of existing social networking platforms may play a role in an individual’s beliefs pertaining to their ability to perform physical activity (self-efficacy), and the personal value one places on the outcomes of physical activity (identified regulation), both of which, are consistently shown to be strong predictors of sustained engagement in physical activity (Ingledew & Markland, 2008; McAuley, 1992; Sallis et al., 1992; Teixeira et al., 2012; Wallace et al., 2000). It is also important to note that research suggests that social support is a precursor to self-efficacy (Anderson et al., 2010).

    • The textbook of health psychology

      2024, The Textbook of Health Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research is part of Lorraine Wallace's doctoral dissertation directed by Janet Buckworth. The authors acknowledge the contribution of Mohammed Atiq Rahman, Ph.D., for providing statistical assistance with this research project. We thank the reviewers for their useful comments.

    ☆☆

    This study was funded by the School of Physical Activity and Educational Services, Ohio State University.

    1

    To whom reprint requests should be addressed at the Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Texas at Tyler, 3900 University Blvd., Tyler, TX 75799. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text