Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 30, Issue 3, March 2000, Pages 191-199
Preventive Medicine

Regular Article
Leisure-Time, Occupational, and Household Physical Activity among Professional, Skilled, and Less-Skilled Workers and Homemakers

https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0619Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Adults in lower status occupations are at higher risk of premature cardiovascular disease, for which physical inactivity is a major risk factor. While lower rates of leisure-time physical activity have been found to be associated consistently with lower income and education levels, the association between occupational and home-based physical activity with membership of different occupational categories is not well understood.

Methods. An urban-representative population data set derived from a self-completion questionnaire was used to examine both self-reported leisure-time physical activity and a combined measure of occupational/home-based physical activity of adult less-skilled, skilled, and professional workers and homemakers (3795 males; 4140 females). χ2 analyses, ANOVA, and logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between occupational group membership and physical activity.

Results. After adjustment for age, body mass index, education, country of birth, marital status, and smoking, less-skilled workers were less likely to report any form of leisure-time physical activity. However, occupational category was not a strong predictor of participation in combined vigorous occupational/home physical activity. Homemakers and those in lower status occupations were less likely to report participation in vigorous leisure-time physical activity sufficient for cardiorespiratory fitness. With the inclusion of time spent in combined vigorous occupational/home physical activity, there was no longer an association of activity with occupational status for males. However, for females the association remained.

Conclusions. The assessment of occupational and household physical activity in addition to leisure-time activity may be important for understanding associations between occupational categories, physical activity, and increased levels of health risk and for the development of physical activity promotion strategies.

References (38)

  • J Cassell et al.

    Occupation and physical activity and coronary heart disease

    Arch Int Med

    (1971)
  • RS Paffenbarger et al.

    Work activity and coronary heart mortality

    N Engl J Med

    (1975)
  • LF Moller et al.

    Physical activity, physical fitness, and cardiovascular risk factors

    Dan Med Bull

    (1991)
  • ML Slattery et al.

    Leisure time physical activity and coronary heart disease death. The US railroad study

    Circulation

    (1989)
  • N Owen et al.

    The descriptive epidemiology of a sedentary lifestyle in adult Australians

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1992)
  • S Bennett

    Cardiovascular risk factors in Australia: trends in socioeconomic inequalities

    J Epi Comm Health

    (1995)
  • AS Leon et al.

    Physical inactivity

  • J Rutenfranz et al.

    Work load and demanded physical performance capacity under different industrial working conditions

  • Cited by (175)

    • The relationship between occupational physical activity and self-reported vs measured total physical activity

      2019, Preventive Medicine Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, differences in total physical activity are not observed but domain specific differences (leisure, travel and occupational) do exist. These findings are consistent with previous research showing that individuals in occupations that require little physical activity (professional-type/ higher-status occupations) tend to do more leisure time physical activity, and the opposite is true with individuals in occupations that require a lot of physical activity (white/blue-collar occupation) tend to do little leisure time activity (Kirk and Rhodes, 2011; Caban-Martinez et al., 2007; Popham and Mitchell, 2006; Salmon et al., 2000). Physical activity has been shown to improve chronic disease morbidity and mortality, yet additional research is needed to understand how physical activity during different domains of daily living such as occupation, active transport, household chores and leisure time activity influence overall physical activity levels.

    • The association between income and leisure-time physical activity is moderated by utilitarian lifestyles: A nationally representative US population (NHANES 1999–2014)

      2018, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      As persons of lower SES are more likely to be employed in physically demanding jobs (Caban-Martinez et al., 2007; Salmon et al., 2000; Van Domelen et al., 2011), not accounting for occupational-related PA when assessing the link between low SES and LTPA may be introducing measurement error into the estimates. Indeed, the studies that have assessed the link between SES and LTPA after accounting for occupational-related PA have shown mixed findings (Salmon et al., 2000; Wolin and Bennett, 2008; Finger et al., 2012). While accounting for occupation-related PA may help to better clarify associations as a function of different domains of overall energy expenditure, it might also introduce bias.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    We thank the National Heart Foundation of Australia for permission to use data from the 1989 Risk Factor Prevalence Survey. Jo Salmon is a recipient of the Deakin University Postgraduate Research Award. This study was supported by a grant from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, as part of the Active 2000 Health Goals & Targets Projects, a collaborative program between Vicfit and Deakin University.

    1

    To whom reprint requests should be addressed at School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Victoria 3125. Fax: 61-3-9244 6017. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text