Table 3

Perceived importance of attributes and levels from choice tasks

Attributes and levelsNumber of times selected/number of times presented (%)Standardised utility (β) (95% CI)Attribute utility rangeAttribute importance scores (%)*
1. Pain characteristics
  Dull ache2040/4315 (47)−0.08 (−0.114 to −0.048)0.165
 Severe unpredictable episodes2275/4315 (53)0.08 (0.048 to 0.114)
2. Level of disruption to everyday life
  None835/2840 (29)−0.65 (−0.706 to −0.590)1.1031
 Some1590/2859 (56)0.20 (0.147 to 0.255)
 Most1892/2931 (65)0.45 (0.392 to 0.502)
3. Comorbidity
  None1275/2944 (43)−0.22 (−0.276 to −0.169)0.4613
 Minor1390/2836 (49)−0.01 (−0.065 to 0.044)
 Major1651/2850 (58)0.23 (0.179 to 0.287)
4. Assessment
  Asks about symptoms and impact1136/2853 (40)−0.27 (−0.328 to −0.219)0.4814
 As above plus thorough physical examination1507/2842 (53)0.06 (0.007 to 0.117)
 As above, appropriate X-rays /bloods1678/2935 (57)0.21 (0.157 to 0.265)
5. Management
  Pain relief, verbal advice1178/2930 (40)−0.26 (−0.312 to −0.208)0.4513
 Pain relief, written advice, PN f/up, PT referral1530/2858 (54)0.07 (0.012 to 0.120)
 Pain relief, written advice, PN follow-up, PT referral, promising new treatment1609/2842 (57)0.19 (0.141 to 0.247)
6. GP attitude
  Normal ageing, accept it1360/4315 (32)−0.43 (−0.466 to −0.397)0.8624
 Legitimate problem, requires treatment2955/4315 (68)0.43 (0.397 to 0.466)
  • *Attribute utility range/sum total of attribute utility ranges.

  • GP, general practitioner; PN f/up, practice nurse follow-up; PT physiotherapy.