Control | Intervention | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | (%) | N | (%) | |
London TB sector* | ||||
North Central | 7 | 29 | 4 | 18 |
North East | 6 | 25 | 7 | 32 |
North West | 5 | 21 | 8 | 36 |
South East | 6 | 25 | 3 | 14 |
Hostel size | ||||
43 or less beds | 13 | 54 | 12 | 55 |
Greater than 43 beds | 11 | 46 | 10 | 45 |
Historical screening uptake | ||||
50% or less | 15 | 63 | 12 | 55 |
Greater than 50% | 9 | 38 | 10 | 45 |
Effectiveness of hostel† | ||||
13 or less | 12 | 50 | 10 | 45 |
Greater than 13 | 12 | 50 | 12 | 55 |
Incentives provided for screening‡ | ||||
No | 15 | 63 | 15 | 68 |
Yes | 9 | 38 | 6 | 27 |
Unknown | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
*TB control is split into geographical sectors in London.
†Categorisation performed by splitting the data in half; see online supplementary appendix for full details of how this was calculated.
‡May have included food or vouchers for food.
TB, tuberculosis.