Table 1

Study characteristics, course structure and content

Lead author
Reference
Year
Country
Study typeParticipant number and specialtyCourse structureCourse content
Aboumatar41
2012
USA
Before and after study120 third-year medical students. Recruited from a single institution3-day clinically oriented patient safety intersession using role-play and simulation, skills demonstrations, small-group exercises and case-based learningMedical error understanding and prevention, teamwork and communication, systems thinking
Ahmed20
2014
UK
Before and after study1169 junior physicians across a region (16 institutions)Monthly 60 min sessions led by junior physicians between January and July 2011. Sessions comprised case-based discussion and analysis of patient safety incidents encountered in practice, facilitated by trained facultyKey patient safety concepts, RCA/systems-based analysis, communication and teamwork, incident reporting
Anderson18
2009
UK
Before and after study199 students including 58 final year medical students learning in uni-professional groups and 36 learning in interprofessional groups as part of a regional programme1-day workshop involving DVD and small-group facilitated discussion to analyse key safety issues using the National Patient Safety Agency RCA tool. Supporting handbook containing additional relevant materials. Nine events held over 2 yearsDVD of patient journey to focus on learning themes of situational awareness, communication, leadership and empowerment. RCA
Arora21
2012
UK
Before and after study27 surgical residents. Recruited from across 19 hospitals3 h training programme comprising lectures, video demonstrations and small-group discussionsPatient safety overview, adverse events, human factors, systems-based analysis, communication and teamwork in surgery
Cox28
2009
USA
Before and after studyOver 787 interprofessional teams of medical, nursing, health administration and respiratory therapy students. Recruited from across 3 sites4-week curriculum comprising lectures, problem-based learning, small-group work, simulation. Participants given cases describing a medical error. Team-based simulation of RCA and use of performance improvement tools. Presentation on completionPatient safety overview, RCA, QI overview, teamwork
Cox31
2011
USA
Prospective cohort study12 faculty members and 46 internal medicine residents.
Recruited from a single institution
3 h long faculty development session including videos, role-play and mock facilitation sessions. Plus manual of key safety education topics. Implementation of an alternative reporting system for anonymous narratives of ‘care that did not go as intended’. Monthly ‘Safety Story’ sessions of 4–6 residents with faculty member to discuss contributing factors and propose potential solutionsFaculty training included patient safety overview, RCA and teamwork
Dudas34
2011
USA
Retrospective pre–post study108 medical students (second-year, third-year and fourth-year students as part of paediatric clerkship). Recruited from a single institutionDuring course of 9-week clerkship, 25 min online video on systems-based analysis of medical errors. 60 min large-group faculty demonstration of Learning From Defects tool. Subsequent self-directed small-group identification and analysis of medication errors in practice. Group presentation at closing 60 min sessionSystems-based analysis
Gupta43
2014
USA
Retrospective pre–post study26 neonatology fellows. Recruited from a single institutionWorkshops, web-based modules, completion of a quality and safety project, presentation at departmental conference, participation in departmental morbidity and mortality conference. Optional selected readings and web-based modulesCore patient safety concepts, QI, human factors, communication and teamwork, error disclosure, incident reporting and systems thinking
Hall32
2010
USA
Before and after study and comparison with historical control146 third-year medical students undertaking a medicine clerkship. 65 in intervention group, 81 in control group. Recruited from a single institution2 mandatory 1 h patient safety ‘booster’ conferences. First conference involved RCA brainstorming exercise of an adverse event. Assignment to identify and summarise an actual patient safety event or concern. During second conference case presentation including proposed system modifications to improve patient safetyRCA including proposed system modifications for improvement
Holland42
2010
USA
Before and after study26 PGY-3 internal medical residents. Recruited from a single institution4-week rotation comprising web-based patient safety and QI curriculum including interactive modules, and self-directed reading and assignments. Completion of QI proposal and presentation at end of rotationPatient safety overview, QI overview including PDSA, medical error, RCA, human factors engineering, safety interventions
Jansma23
2010
The Netherlands
Before and after study with 6-month follow-up33 specialty registrars (GP, anaesthesiology, dermatology, internal medicine). Recruited from a single institution2-day course comprising plenaries, group discussions and role-playPatient safety overview, human error, disclosure, medicolegal aspects of critical incidents, RCA, tips and tools to improve safety in practice
Jansma24
2010
The Netherlands
Prospective cohort study71 residents (surgical and non-surgical). Recruited from 5 hospitalsMultispecialty 2-day patient safety course including plenaries and small-group sessions. At end of course participants asked to formulate 1 action point to improve patient safetyPatient safety overview, human factors, teamwork, contribution to safer care (including RCA), medicolegal aspects
Jericho33
2010
USA
Before and after studyAnaesthesiology residents (approximately 51—number not clearly stated). Recruited from a single institution90 min interactive case-based lecture coupled with an expectation of adverse event reporting. Supplemented with education manual. Quarterly conferences to discuss reports and near-immediate feedback from Department of Safety and Risk ManagementPatient safety definitions, adverse event reporting, investigation/process improvements, communication, and apology and remedy
Jha22
2013
UK
Before and after study with control group and follow-up263 junior physicians across a region (155 in intervention group, 108 in control group)3 h teaching session. Intervention group: patients shared their stories about their experience of safety incidents. Non-intervention group: teaching delivered using “standard methods of teaching”, including presentations and small-group workError analysis. Teaching session covered: prescribing, teamwork and communication
Leung25
2010
China
Before and after study130 third-year medical students.
Recruited from a single institution
Two 60 min whole-class lectures using contemporary medical incidents as illustrative casesBased on WHO curriculum: patient safety overview, human factors, systems thinking, team working, understanding and learning from error, introduction to QI, medication safety
Miller27
2014
USA
Before and after study110 medical and allied health students. Recruited from a single institution1 h introductory lecture discussing general patient safety and QI topics followed by 2 courses (‘Introduction to the Culture of Safety’ and ‘Teamwork and Communication’) including group discussionsPatient safety, QI, teamwork, communication
Myung26
2012
Republic of Korea
Before and after study156 second-year medical students. Recruited from a single institution1-week course composed of interactive lecture, discussion and small-group debriefingBased on WHO curriculum: patient safety overview, human factors, systems thinking, team working, understanding and learning from error, introduction to QI, medication safety; in addition: RCA
Paxton37
2010
USA
Before and after study with control group and follow-up51 surgical clerkship students including 46 medical and 5 physician assistant students.
Recruited from a single institution
2 h small-group discussion incorporating slide presentationPatient safety overview, RCA, epidemiology, error theory, error disclosure and legal considerations
Rodrigue30
2013
USA
Before and after study42 residents and 36 faculty members. Recruited from a single institution5 online modules that residents and faculty members completed together in pairs (duration of each module unreported)Performance improvement, QI, patient safety, teaching and learning
Scott40
2011
USA
Prospective cohort study680 residents across medical and surgical specialties. Recruited from a single institutionEconomic incentive comprised retirement benefit of 1.5% of residents’ annual salaries. Multifaceted educational campaign including monthly email notifications, audience presentation at major conferences (exact frequency not stated) and one-on-one discussionPresentation covered mechanics of incident reporting, discussing barriers and dispelling myths
Shaw39
2012
USA
Randomised controlled trial371 interns across medical and surgical specialties. Recruited from across 2 hospitals2 interventions compared: Online Spaced Education programme consisting of cases and questions that reinforce over time, and SQ programme comprising online slide-show followed by quizCovered all 9 2009 NPSGs including handover, patient identification, hand hygiene and medication safety
Slater19
2012
UK
Before and after study11 multiprofessional teams comprising 55 health professionals (including 16 junior physicians and 12 senior physicians). Recruited from across 5 sites20-week ‘TAPS’ programme. 2 h online learning module; multiprofessional workshops to conduct QI project, executive-group discussion for organisational learningHuman error, QI tools (process mapping, fishbone diagrams and measurement for improvement)
Smith35
2012
USA
Prospective cohort study280 internal medicine residents over 2 years. Recruited from a single institutionMonthly noontime QIC. RCA of selected real-life safety events (selected by seniors, analysed by residents not associated with the case). Limited RCA with online resources and mentorship. Presentation to fellow residents and seniors. Intervention proposed and followed through where possibleRCA and QI
Stahl38
2011
USA
Before and after study with control group110 third-year medical students on surgical clerkship (67 in intervention group, 43 in control group). Recruited from a single institutionTwo-part patient safety curriculum: all students attended 1-day lecture on introductory theories, video and small-group discussion (first year). Intervention group attended additional 1.5–2 h clinically oriented classroom discussion, videos, simulation and role-play (third year)Patient safety principles, crew resource management, team skills, task management and situational awareness
Tess44
2009
USA
Retrospective pre–post study74 internal medicine residents. Recruited from a single institutionEducational intervention coupled with reorganisation of clinical services to integrate patient safety and QI into daily clinical practice. The educational intervention incorporated an online module in year 1, and a 3-week rotation in QI in year 2. Faculty-led workshops on RCA, performance improvement and the institutional approach to QIPatient safety overview, QI and RCA
Wilson29
2012
USA
Prospective cohort study23 graduate level students (including 7 medical students).
Recruited from a single institution
Weekly 3 h sessions held over a 15-week period. Each session comprised a presentation by a visiting expert, discussion on assigned reading material and small-group patient safety project workPatient safety overview, human factors analysis, systems approach to error analysis, crew resource management, law, and policy, and team building
  • GP, general practitioner; NPSGs, National Patient Safety Goals; PDSA, plan, do, study, act; PGY, postgraduate year; QI, quality improvement; QIC, QI conference; RCA, root cause analysis; SQ, safety questionnaire; TAPS, Training and Action for Patient Safety.