Table 1

Medical students’ 10 most common professionalism dilemmas reported at least once during the past 12 months

Questionn (%) of responsesn (and % of gender) for item response; n (%) for item of mode distress rating by gender
FemaleMale
Student asked questions by clinical teacher that are unrealistic and beyond level of training*†‡§1260 (52.6)894 (55.3); 387 (43.3) Mild366 (46.9); 177 (48.4) None
Student asked repeated questions by clinical teacher in an intimidating way (eg, ‘grilled’, ‘drilled’)*†‡§1213 (50.6)864 (53.5); 349 (40.4) Mild349 (44.7); 138 (39.5) None
Clinician obtained patient consent for student learning through verbal coercion†§1152 (48.1)812 (50.3); 396 (48.8) Mild340 (43.5); 230 (67.6) None
Clinician talked about a patient inappropriately to student or other person*†‡1080 (45.1)773 (47.8); 387 (50.1) Mild307 (39.3); 155 (50.5) Mild
Student been subjected to a patient criticising a clinical colleague (eg, doctor, nurse etc.)*†1003 (41.8)711 (44.0); 348 (48.9) Mild292 (37.4); 152 (52.1) None
Clinician asked student to instigate unnecessary patient discomfort for students’ learning needs†‡¶886 (37.0)440 (27.2); 240 (54.5) Mild229 (29.3); 119 (52) Mild
Student felt excluded from learning opportunity (eg, patient care) by clinical teacher*†‡878 (36.6)645 (39.9); 332 (51.5) Mild233 (29.8); 101 (43.3) Mild
Student witnessed clinicians compromising patient safety (poor hygiene)†‡§869 (36.2)622 (38.5); 348 (55.9) Mild247 (31.6); 115 (46.6) Mild
Clinician coerced patient consent for student learning by misrepresenting student identity†‡§864 (36.0)598 (37.0); 303 (50.7) Mild266 (34.1); 124 (46.6) None
Student subjected to a doctor criticising a clinical colleague (eg, nurse, another doctor etc)†863 (36.0)607 (37.6); 292 (48.1) Mild256 (32.8); 136 (53.1) None
  • Number of responses based on participants indicating this had happened, distress responses were lower as some omitted to answer this part of the question.

  • *These 5 items also fall within the top 10 most reported events by other healthcare students in table 2.

  • †Significant effect of gender on moral distress.

  • ‡Significant effect of frequency on moral distress.

  • §Also in the top three most frequently reported patient-focused or student-focused dilemmas (reported occurring 6+ times over the past year).

  • ¶Contributed to ‘Habituation’ effect (all others with effect of frequency=Disturbance).