Author, year | Study population | Sample size | Intervention | Outcome | Significant outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donovan et al 201018 | LTC residents Mean age=85.8 | n=813 | Randomised trial conducted at a long-term care facility equipped with an integrated EMR and CPOE over a 1-year period. Randomisation was within blocks according to resident unit type. CDSS for 22 psychotropic medications was developed. CDSS had 2 broad alert categories; ‘dosing’ and ‘avoid’ to identify inappropriate psychotropic medication orders | The overall rates of inappropriate orders Percentages of medication orders that were modified in response to alerts | CDSS provided to prescribers influenced prescribing decision, although no overall improvement in prescribing quality was noted. |
Field et al 200919 | LTC residents Mean age=86.3 | n=833 | Randomised trial within the long-stay units of a long-term care facility. Alerts related to medication prescribing for residents with renal insufficiency were displayed to prescribers in the intervention units and hidden but tracked in control units. 4 types of alerts were developed: (1) recommended medication doses, (2) recommended administration frequencies, (3) to avoid the drug and (4) warnings of missing information. Alerts were measured over 1-year period | Proportion of final drug orders that were appropriate | CCDSS for physicians prescribing medications for LTC residents with renal insufficiency improved the quality of prescribing decisions. Higher proportions of final drug orders were appropriate in the intervention units (RR=2.4, 1.4 to 4.4 for maximum frequency; RR=2.6, 1.4 to 5.0 for drugs that should be avoided; and RR=1.8, 1.1 to 3.4 for alerts to acquire missing information). Final drug orders were appropriate significantly more often in the intervention units (alerts displayed) with a RR of 1.2 (1.0 to 1.4). |
Gurwitz et al 200828 | LTC residents Mean age=87.2 | n=1118 | 29 resident care units were randomised to having a CCDSS or not. In the intervention unit, prescribers were presented with alerts while alerts were not displayed to prescribers in the control units over a 1-year period | Number of ADE, severity and preventability of the events | CPOE with DSS did not reduce ADE rate or preventable drug event rate in the LTC. |
Handler et al 200827 | All nursing home residents except those enrolled in hospice | n=274 | A clinical event monitor (a type of CCDSS) implemented and evaluated in the detection of ADR in a nursing home over 15-week period | PPV of signals that detected ADR, the amount of preventable ADR and serious ADR | ADR can be detected in the nursing homes with a high degree of accuracy using a clinical event monitor. The overall PPV for all signals was 81%. Of the true positive findings, one-third of the ADR were considered preventable. Of the preventable ADR, 88% occurred at the monitoring and 69% at the prescribing stage. |
Judge et al 200622 | Residents in the long-stay units of the LTC | n=445 | RCT of CCDSS in the long-stay units of a long-term care facility. CCDSS was added to an existing CPOE system. Over 1-year, prescribers in the intervention units were presented with alerts and prescribers in the control units were not displayed alerts. CCDSS was designed to provide alerts on: (1) drug interactions, (2) danger related to the ordered medication, (3) risk of adverse effects, (4) dose ranges and (5) likelihood of adverse drug effects | The proportion of alerts that were followed by an appropriate action | Of 47 997 medication orders, 9414 alerts were triggered (2.5 alerts per resident per month); 20% central nervous system-related side effect alerts such as oversedation, 13% drug-associated constipation alerts, 12% renal insufficiency/electrolyte imbalance alerts and 12% warfarin-related alerts. CCDSS with CPOE is effective in presenting alerts, therefore represents as a tool to improve medication safety. Prescribers who received alerts were only slightly more likely to take an appropriate action (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.22). |
Kennedy et al 201120 | Residents in LTC with renal impairment. Mean age=87.0±7.4 | n=1196 | A CCDSS developed in partnership with a large pharmacy provider that generated renal prescribing alerts. 7 LTC across Ontario, Canada participated in a 3-month programme evaluation | The number of alerts and the physician response to alerts | Physicians responded to 70% of the alerts with a dose change or medication discontinuation. During the 3 months’ duration, 446 alerts were generated in 321 residents; 27% of all residents received at least 1 alert. |
Tamblyn et al 201221 | Patients aged 65 and older who were prescribed psychotropic medication Mean age=75.2 | n=5628 | Cluster RCT intervention tested whether CDSS with patient-specific risk estimates would increase physician response to alerts and reduce the risk of injury in older adults over a 2-year period. Physicians in the intervention unit received a patient-specific risk of injury alert when a patient was prescribed a psychotropic medication that increased the risk of injury while physicians in the control unit received commercial drug alerts. In a secondary analysis, physicians’ response to the injury risk alert and changes in the use and dose of psychotropic medications were assessed | Injury risk at the end of follow-up based on psychotropic drug doses and non-modifiable risk factors | CCDSS with patient-specific risk estimates provide an effective method to reduce the risk of injury for vulnerable older adults. The intervention reduced the risk of injury by 1.7 injuries/1000 patients (95% CI 0.2/1000 to 3.2/1000; p=0.02). The effect of the intervention was greater for patients with higher baseline risks of injury (p<0.03). Intervention physicians reviewed therapy in 83.3% of visits and modified therapy in 24.6% visits. |
ADE, adverse drug events; ADR, adverse drug reactions; CCDSS, computerised clinical decision support system; CDSS, clinical decision support system; CPOE, computerised physician order entry; DSS, decision support system; EMR, electronic medical records; PPV, positive predictive value; RCT, randomised controlled trials; RR, relative risk; LTC, long-term care home.