Table 5

Univariate and adjusted analysis comparing participants who used medical masks and cloth masks*

Univariate
RR (95% CI)
Adjusted
RR (95% CI)
CRI
 Medical mask (35/750, 4.67%)RefRef
 Cloth mask (46/607, 7.58%)1.62 (1.06 to 2.49)1.51 (0.97 to 2.32)
 Male0.60 (0.32 to 1.12)0.58 (0.31 to 1.08)
 Vaccination0.66 (0.17 to 2.62)0.68 (0.17 to 2.67)
 Hand washing0.81 (0.58 to 1.15)0.84 (0.59 to 1.20)
 Compliance1.01 (1.00 to 1.03)1.01 (1.00 to 1.02)
ILI
 Medical mask (2/750, 0.27%)RefRef
 Cloth mask (13/607, 2.14%)8.03 (1.82 to 35.45)6.64 (1.45 to 28.65)
 Male0.95 (0.27 to 3.35)0.92 (0.26 to 3.22)
 Vaccination1.87 (0.25 to 13.92)1.97 (0.27 to 14.45)
 Hand washing0.56 (0.24 to 1.27)0.61 (0.23 to 1.57)
 Compliance1.04 (1.01 to 1.08)1.04 (1.00 to 1.08)
Laboratory-confirmed viruses
 Medical mask (22/750, 2.93%)RefRef
 Cloth mask (34/607, 5.60%)1.91 (1.13 to 3.23)1.72 (1.01 to 2.94)
 Male0.64 (0.30 to 1.33)0.61 (0.29 to 1.27)
 Vaccination0.97 (0.24 to 3.86)1.03 (0.26 to 4.08)
 Hand washing0.61 (0.41 to 0.93)0.65 (0.42 to 1.00)
 Compliance1.00 (0.99 to 1.02)1.0 (0.99 to 1.02)
  • Bold typeface indicates statistically significant. *The majority (456/458) of HCWs in the control arm used a mask. Controls who exclusively used a medical mask were categorised and analysed with the medical mask arm participants; and controls who exclusively wore a cloth mask were categorised and analysed with the cloth mask arm.

  • CRI, clinical respiratory illness; HCWs, healthcare workers; ILI, influenza-like illness; RR, relative risk.