Table 1

Main characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis

Study cohortYearStudy regionResearch timeFollow-up (month)TreatmentM/F (n)Age (years)Tumour typeDistal metastasis (n)
De Martino et al162013USA1995–2012Mean:49; IQR: (15–71)Radical and partial nephrectomy202/79Mean: 63; IQR: (54–72)Non-clear cell RCC0
Ohno et al172012Japan1990–2008Mean±SD: (75±54)Radical and partial nephrectomy186/64Mean±SD: (61±12)Clear cell RCC0
Ohno et al122014Japan1990–2008Mean (range): 20.6 (1–114)Cytoreductive nephrectomy: Yes 48; No 2561/12Cytoreductive nephrectomy (median (range)): yes: 63 (38–79); No: 65 (34–88)mRCC73
Dirican et al182013Turkey2006–2011Median:13.43; range: (1.97–40.91)Nephrectomy, INF-α, sunitinib17/6Median (range): 59 (43–76)Clear cell RCC:18; non-clear cell RCC: 523
Keizman et al192014USA, Israel2004–2013NASunitinib186/92Median: 63mRCC278
Santoni et al202013Italy2005–2013Median:46.9; 95% CI (39.9 to 53.9)Past nephrectomy: 91; second-line everolimus: 65; third-line everolimus: 3270/27Median:64; 95% CI (44 to 82)mRCC97
Cetin et al212013Turkey2008–2011Median:15; range: (1–53)First-line therapy with IFN-α; second-line therapy with VEGF targeted TKIs76/24Median (range): 58 (24–80)mRCC: clear cell 73; non-clear cell 24; unknown 3100: liver 17; bone 24; lung 65
Forget et al222013Belgium1993–2005Median:74.5; IQR: (31–112)Radical nephrectomy71/156Mean±SD: (63±12)Clear cell 166; tubulopapillary 29; chromophobe 4; others 280
Pichler et al232013Austria2000–2010Mean (range): 44 (0–130)Curative radical or partial nephrectomyTotal: 678Mean±SD: (63.7±11.9)Clear cell RCC0
Kobayashi et al242013Japan2008–2012Median:12; range: (1.1–48.9)Radical nephrectomy, cytokine therapy and sorafenib, sunitinib or mTORi44/14Median (range): 64 (53–81)mRCC26
Templeton et al252014CanadaNANATargeted therapyTotal: 859NARCCNA
Fox et al262013Australia2002–2005NAAs in EGF20001268/94Median (range): 62 (19–84)mRCC362
Huang et al272011USA2004–2011Median: 35SunitinibTotal: 109NAmRCC109
Hatakeyama et al282013Japan1995–2013Surgery: 26; immunotherapy or IFN-α: 5Radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy, immunotherapy or IFN-α55/30Mean±SD: (62±12)RCC with tumour thrombus14
Study cohortNLR valueCut-offElevated NLR (n)Survival analysisHRAdjustment variablesNOS score
De Martino et al16Median (IQR): 2.6 (1.9–3.6)3.6NARFS (DFS)R (M)Age, gender, ECOG performance score, pT stage, TNM group, grade, MVI, subtype, ANC, ALC7
Ohno et al17Mean±SD: 2.62±1.442.784RFSR (M)Age, presentation, nephrectomy, tumour size, pT, grade, MVI, eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, neutrophil, lymphocytes8
Ohno et al12Mean±SD: 3.98±2.274NAOSR (M)Age, presentation mode, T stage, ECOG PS, Charlson comorbidity index, haemoglobin, LDH, corrected calcium, CRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes5
Dirican et al18NA3NAOS, PFSE (U)/4
Keizman et al19NA3NAOS, PFSR (M)Unclear5
Santoni et al20Median: 2.2338OS, PFSR (M)Gender, age, Motzer prognostic group, PFS on first-line therapy, neutrophilia6
Cetin et al21Median: 3.043.0450OS, PFSR (U)Age, tumour history, sex, haemoglobin level, red cell distribution width, albumin level, alkaline phosphatase level, PFS, site and number of metastatic organs, MSKCC score, dose reduction, second-line mTOR inhibitors5
Forget et al22Median (IQR): 3.01 (1.97–4.49)552OS, RFSR (U)Age, sex, node status, histological grade, stage8
Pichler et al23Mean±SD: 3.51±2.493.3398OS,RFS (MFS), CSSR (M)Age, gender, T stage, tumour grade, presence of tumour necrosis7
Kobayashi et al24Mean±SD: sorafenib: 4.25±3.01; sunitinib: 4.50±3.43; mTORi: 4.26±2.874.41Sorafenib: 8; sunitinib: 23; mTORi: 16OS, PFSR (M) in OS, E (U) in PFSKarnofsky PS, metastasis at presentation, number of metastases, prior nephrectomy, prior cytokine therapy, initial targeted agent, Heng’s risk classification, pretreatment level of haemoglobin, platelet count, albumin, CRP, corrected calcium5
Templeton et al25Mean: 4.98;
Median (95% CI) 3.51 (1.42 to 14.0)
2.5622OSR (M), E (U)6 international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC)/
Fox et al26NA3188OSR (M)MSKCC and systemic inflammation markers7
Huang et al27NA357OS, PFSR (U)//
Hatakeyama et al28Mean±SD: 3.1±1.5NANAOSR (U, M)Age, ECOG-performance status, gender, thrombus level, distant metastasis, underwent surgery, haemoglobin, serum albumin, eGFR, cholinesterase, serum sodium, correlated calcium, LDH, CRP, Charison comorbidity index, molecular targeted agents5
  • HR obtained by reporting in text (R), or estimating (E).

  • ANC, absolute neutrophil count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; CSS; CRP, C reactive protein;

  • CSS, cancer-specific survival; DFS, disease free survival; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, ; EGF, epidermal growth factor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFN-α, interferon α; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; M/F, male, female; (M), the HR comes from multivariate analysis; MFS, metastasis free survival; mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; mTORi, inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin; MVI, microvascular invasion; NA, not available; NLR, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale; OS, overall survival; PFS, progress-free survival; PS, performance status; pT, primary tumour; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RFS, recurrence-free survival; TNM, tumour, node, metastasis; TKIs, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor; (U), the HR comes from univariate analysis; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.