Table 2

The association between the protein:carbohydrate ratio z-score and protein intake (substituted for carbohydrates*) in mid-pregnancy and gestational weight gain (g/week), N=46 262

Gestational weight gain (g/week)
Crude (meanΔ, 95% CI)Adjusted† (meanΔ, 95% CI)
Protein:carbohydrate ratio z-scorep for trend‡p for trend
Q1 (−1.3±0.4)§0 (reference)<0.00010 (reference)<0.0001
Q2 (−0.5±0.1)−7 (−13 to −0)−6 (−13 to −0)
Q3 (−0.1±0.1)−13 (−19 to −6)−11 (−18 to −5)
Q4 (0.4±0.2)−16 (−22 to −9)−12 (−19 to -6)
Q5 (1.4±0.8)−24 (−30 to −18)−16 (−22 to −9)
Protein-carbohydrate substitution¶p for trendp for trend
Q1 (71±6)§0 (reference)<0.00010 (reference)<0.0001
Q2 (83±2)−9 (−15 to −2)−10 (−17 to −4)
Q3 (90±2)−6 (−13 to 0)−8 (−14 to −1)
Q4 (96±2)−12 (−19 to −5)−12 (−18 to −5)
Q5 (109±7)−16 (−23 to −9)−13 (−20 to −7)
Low protein¶p Valuep Value
<12% vs ≥12%15 (6 to 24)0.00117 (8 to 26)0.0001
High protein¶p Valuep Value
>20% vs ≤20%−23 (−33 to −13)<0.0001−15 (−25 to −5)0.002
Low versus high protein¶ (N=4733)p Valuep Value
<12% vs >20%39 (22 to 55)<0.000136 (20 to 53)<0.0001
  • *Isocaloric regression models including protein and fat while excluding carbohydrates.

  • †Adjusted for parental socioeconomic status, maternal age, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal height, maternal smoking, civil status and total energy intake.

  • ‡p Value for trend using the quintile median.

  • §Means±SD. Means±SD for protein are energy-adjusted.

  • ¶Additionally adjusted for total fat intake.