Table 4

Summary measures of performance of the direct smear diagnostic tests for 150 matched samples and the statistical differences in sensitivity and specificity of FM, CY and PiLED in comparison with ZN

Gold standDirect SmearSnSpPPVNPVSnD (95% CI)p Value*SpD (95% CI)p Value*
AZN50.089.781.866.0
FM61.179.573.368.911.1 (3.0 to 19.0)0.02710.2 (2.5 to 17.4)0.182
CY54.287.279.667.34.2 (−2.9 to 11.3)0.4502.5 (−3.6 to 8.6)0.684
PiLED59.773.167.266.39.7 (1.9 to 17.5)0.04616.6 (8.6 to 24.6)0.001
BZN35.878.365.950.9
FM44.465.260.050.08.6 (2.4 to 14.8)0.02313.1 (3.9 to 22.1)0.016
CY40.776.867.352.54.9 (0.2 to 9.6)0.1342.5 (−4.4 to 9.4)0.684
PiLED48.163.860.951.212.3 (4.9 to 19.6)0.0041.4 (−5.5 to 7.9)0.683
CZN45.684.170.565.1
FM51.569.558.363.35.9 (−2.1 to 13.9)0.28914.6 (6.6 to 22.6)0.006
CY48.580.567.365.33.1 (−0.9 to 7.1)0.4793.6 (−2.6 to 9.8)0.131
PiLED57.469.560.966.311.8 (2.2 to 21.4)0.04314.6 (7.5 to 21.7)0.004
  • SnD, sensitivity difference; percentage points above ZN performance.

  • SpD, specificity difference; percentage points below ZN performance.

  • 2 p value generated from McNemar's test.

  • CY, CysCope fluorescence microscopy; FM, mercury vapour fluorescence microscopy; PiLED, Primo Star iLED fluorescence microscopy; Sn, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.