Table 2

Loss of muscle mass as outcome measures and factors associated with it

First author (year)PatientsStudyComparisonResult
n (M/F)Tumour, stageMuscle mass measurement(s)Method of measurementDesignControls
McMillan (2001)5740 (40/0)NSCLC n=11, upper GI n=22, colon n=7
All locally advanced or metastatic
BCMTotal body potassiumCross sectionalNilThe inter-relationship between albumin, body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory responseAlbumin concentrations correlated with BCM (r=0.686, p<0.001) and negatively correlated with CRP (r=−0.545, p<0.001)
Crown (2002)5830 (NR/NR)NSCLC in all
Inoperable, stage NR
FFM, MUACBIA, upper arm measurementsCase-control, longitudinal over 2 yearsn=30 HVILGF system and cancer cachexiaMore LC than HV had MAMC in the lowest quartile (p<0.05) at baseline,
Male LC patients had lower FFM than male HV (p<0.05) at baseline,
No significant longitudinal trend observed in IGFBP-3 and IL-6 and nutritional status, p=NS
Jagoe (2002)5936 (27/9)Mix of NSCLC and SCLC
Stage 1–21
Stage 2–6
Stage 3–6
Stage 4–2
FFMiBIA, Four skinfold method, %BFMAMACross sectionaln=10
patients referred for thoracotomy for non-malignant conditions
Ubiquitin-proteasome and lysosomal proteolytic pathway gene expression in LC and association with LMMCathepsin B expression in LC inversely related to FFMi, p=0.003;
Cathepsin-B expression increased in ‘depleted FFMi cancer patients’ vs controls p=0.003;
No relationship between cathepsin B expression and %BFMAMA, p=NS
Wieland (2007)60286 (NR/NR)NSCLC n=181, stage IIIB or IVSMA at T4CT at T4Longitudinaln=7 HVEstablish prevalence of PIF in patients with cancer, and its association with muscle lossIn patients with NSCLC:
PIF unrelated to survival and muscle loss, p=NS;
PIF positive patients rate of loss of muscle mass per 100 days −3.4±2.1% vs PIF negative patients −2.4±1.7%, p=NS
Martinez-Hernandez (2012)6121 (19/2)LC n=13, GI cancer n=6, Other cancer n=2
Stage according to tumour group NR
FFMBIALongitudinaln=8 HVThe role of IL-15) in patients with cachectic cancerAt weeks 4 and 8, patients with cancer lost FFM in tandem with decreasing IL-15 levels, r=0.514 and r=0.535, both p<0.05
Op den Kamp (2012)5516 (15/1)NSCLC in all
Stage I–II—11
Stage IIIA—2
Stage IIIB—3
FFMiDEXACross sectionaln=10 HVSkeletal muscle NF-κB and ubiquitin proteasome system activity in precachexiaFFMi no significant difference in precachectic cancer vs controls, p=NS;
NF-κB, UPS E3-ligase and 26S proteasome activity not raised in patients with precachectic cancer, all p=NS
Vigano (2009)52N=172 (101/71)NSCLC n=64, All stage III and IV. Metastatic GI cancer n=108LBM, ALMDEXA (n=64)Cross sectionalNilACE gene polymorphism (insertion2-II, insertion/deletion-ID, deletion2-DD) on nutritional statusTrend (p=0.07) towards lower LBM in ID compared to II groups
Op den Kamp (2013)6226 (17/9)NSCLC
Stage IIIB—10
Stage IV—16
FFMi, AMMiDEXACross sectionaln=10 HVExpression of signalling molecules in protein metabolism in LC cachexiaAMMi 20% lower in cachectic group compared with controls, p<0.05;
Akt concentration increased in cachectic group (p<0.05), but no downstream signal phosphorylation, that is, impaired anabolic activity
Harvie (2003)2950 (32/18)NSCLC in all, stage III and IVFFMFour skinfold methodLongitudinalNilExploration of gender-specific differences in body composition and REE prechemotherapy and postchemotherapyTrend for FFM to decrease (p=0.063) and FFM decreased (p<0.05) in men after chemotherapy. No significant difference in FFM or REE in women
Harvie (2005)6343 (28/15)NSCLC in all, stage III and IV. Alongside this metastatic breast and melanoma patients evaluated separatelyFFMFour skinfold methodLongitudinalNilRelationship between energy intake, REE and acute phase response vs changes in body composition over course of chemotherapyNo significant change in FFM over the course of chemotherapy, and no significant relationship with energy intake, REE or CRP (all p=NS)
Bovio (2008)64144 (92/52)LC n=46, colon n=22, HCC n=11, other n=65
Stage NR
AMAUpper arm measurementsCross sectionalNilEvaluation of nutritional status in patients with advanced cancer63% men vs 19% women had AMA<5th centile (p<0.01)
Baracos (2010)25441 (229/212)NSCLC in all
Stage III—206
Stage IV—235
SMA at L3CT of L3Cross sectionalNilThe use of CT images in evaluating body composition in NSCLC61.1% men in cohort were sarcopenic, 31.3% of women sarcopenic, p<0.001
Martin (2013)651473 (828/645)Colorectal cancer n=773, LC n=440, other GI cancer n=260
Stage according to cancer NR
SMA at L3, SMAiCT of L3LongitudinalNilPrognostic significance of weight loss, muscle mass index and muscle attenuationConcordance model using variables of BMI, weight loss, MI and MA found a concordance statistic (predictive accuracy of survival) of 0.92
Regardless of BMI, pts with weight loss, low MI and MA reduced survival (8.4 months), compared to those with none of these features (28.4 months), p<0.001
Prado (2013)66368 (216/152)NSCLC n=242
GI tract cancer n=126
SMA at L3CT of L3LongitudinalNilClinical course of skeletal muscle wasting in advanced cancerBeing <90 days from death increases risk of muscle loss, OR 2.67, p=0.002; and decreases chance of muscle gain, OR=0.37, p=0.002
Hansell (1986)6798 (63/35)Colorectal cancer n=55, gastric cancer n=24, LC n=12, other cancer n=7
Stage NR
LBM, MUACTritiated saline, upper arm measurementsCross sectionaln=38 non-malignant illnessesREE in weight-losing patients with cancer
WLC=weight-losing patients with cancer, WSC=weight-stable patients with cancer, WSC on=weight-stable controls
WLC compared to WSC had lower LBM (p<0.005);
WLC compared to WSC and WSC on lower MAMC (p<0.0005);
WLC had increased REE/kg bodyweight compared with both WS groups (p<0.005);
No significant difference when REE is expressed in terms of kg LBM;
WLC had positive relationship with REE, r=0.83, p<0.001
Fredrix (1990)6839 (GCR 13/9, LC 16/1)LC n=17
GCR—n=22
Stage NR
FFMBIACross sectionaln=40 healthyREE and weight lossFFM: LC 50.4±8.9, Controls 51.1±9.6, p=NS;
REE/FFM: LC 33.5±5.4, Controls 29.6±2.9, p<0.01
Staal-van den Brekel (1997)6912 (10/2)All SCLCFFMBIALongitudinalNilAssess REE and systemic inflammation prechemotherapy and postchemotherapyNo change in FFM postchemotherapy (p=NS). Absolute REE and REE adjusted for FFM decreased postchemotherapy (p<0.005)
Simons (1997)7021 (21/0)NSCLC n=19
Stage I—3
Stage III—5
Stage IV—11
SCLC n=2
Limited stage—2
FFM, FFMiDEXACross sectionalNilRelationship between DL expression, body composition and REEDL vs non-DL no significant difference between groups with regards FFM, FFMi, and REE/FFM, all p=NS
Simons (1999)7120 (20/0)NSCLC n=18
I–II—2
III—5
IV—11
SCLC n=2
BCM, BCMiDEXACross sectionalNilRelationship between weight loss, low BCM and systemic inflammationBCM lower in group with weight loss ≥10% compared to group with weight loss <10%, p=NS;
Low BCMi associated with high REE/BCM,
r=−0.54, p=0.03;
BCMi positively correlated with Karnofsky PS, p=0.02
Scott (2001)7212 (12/0)NSCLC in all, locally advancedBCMTotal body potassiumLongitudinaln=7, healthy participantsInter-relationship between systemic inflammation and REE preonset and postonset of weight lossCancer group had lower REE (p<0.05) and BCM (p<0.001).
Cancer group REE adjusted for BCM correlated with CRP concentrations (r=0.753, p<0.01)
Jatoi (2001)7318 (10/8)NSCLC in all
Stage IA—6
Stage IB—3
Stage IIB—3
Stage IIIA—4
Stage IIIB—2
FFM, BCM, LBMDEXA, Potassium-40, tritium dilutionCross sectionaln=18, HVREE in non-metastatic NSCLCREE in cancer vs controls significantly raised when adjusted for LBM, p=0.001;
and also when adjusted for BCM, p=0.032
Jagoe (2001)2760 (43/17)LC in allFFM, MAMC, BFMAMABIA, four skinfold thickness, upper arm measurementsCross sectionaln=22, mild COPDNutritional status of patients undergoing LC operationsNo difference in FFMi and BFMAMA comparing LC and controls, all p=NS
Sarhill (2003)74n=352 but LC only 18% of cohort ()NRMUAC, AMABIA (n=329)Cross sectionalNilProspective evaluation of nutritional status in advanced cancerCachexia group vs non-cachexia group, reduced AMA in 84% vs 69%, p=0.037
Prado (2008)1n=250, with LC 60 (24%) of cohort (136/114)TNM for cohort
Stage I—24
Stage II—56
Stage III—74
Stage IV—96
SMA and SMAi at L3CT of L3Cross sectionalNilPrevalence of sarcopaenic obesity and chemotherapy toxicity in this cohort
OS=obese sarcopaenic
ONonS=obese non-sarcopaenic
SMA in OS 128.1±29.1, ONonS 160±38.1, p<0.0001
SMAi in OS 43.3±6.3, ONonS 56.4±9.9;
Median survival assoc with sarcopenia log rank, p<0.0001, OS 11.3 months and ONonS 21.6 months, p<0.0001
Kilgour (2010)53n=84, with LC 16 (19%) of cohort (48/36)Metastatic 57%, locally advanced 43%, stage NRSMMI, ALMDEXACross sectionalNilRelationship of fatigue to muscle mass and strengthBrief fatigue index associated with SMMI (95% CI −8.4 to −1.3) p<0.01, and sarcopenia, p<0.01
Peddle-McIntyre (2012)5617 (7,10)NSCLC n=16
Stage I–II—11
Stage III—5
Limited stage SCLC n=1
LBM, ALMDEXALongitudinal, duration 10 weeksNilResistance exercise training efficacy and feasibility in LC survivorsLBM and ALM no change from baseline to post training, all p=NS
Bauer (2005)75n=7, with NSCLC 2 (28.6%) of cohortAdenocarcinoma pancreas n=5, NSCLC n=2
Stage NR
LBMDeuterium dilutionLongitudinal, duration 10 weeksNilEffect of nutrition counselling and EPA supplements on body compositionChange in LBM post intervention, p=NS
Fearon (2006)28518 (355/163)LC n=231
Upper GI cancer n=198
Other GI cancer n=89
Stage NR
LBMBIARCT (double blind, placebo controlled, randomised)NilEffect of 2 g and 4 g doses of EPA diester vs placebo in the process of cachexiaGroup given 2 g EPA gained mean 0.9 kg LBM and group given 4 g EPA lost mean 0.1 kg LBM compared to placebo (p=NS)
Tozer (2008)5466 (49/17); only 35 completed studyAll LC
Stage NR
BCMNRRCT (double blind, placebo controlled, randomised)NilEffect of cysteine-rich protein supplement on body weight and body cell massCysteine group +11.55±18.05% vs control group
−5.47±34.63% after treatment (p=0.01), and compared to baseline (p=0.02)
Murphy (2010)7641 (19/22)NSCLC in all
Stage I—2
Stage II—2
Stage III—13
Stage IV—24
SMA at L3CT of L3Longitudinal, cohort study over 2.5 monthsNilRelationship between muscle mass, rate of muscle mass change, and plasma fatty acidsSarcopenia at baseline in 63% men and 59% women;
Patients with sarcopenia had lower plasma EPA (p=0.001), lower plasma DHA (p=0.003), and lower n-3 fatty acids (p=0.002) compared to non-sarcopenic patients
Murphy (2011)7740 (21/19)NSCLC in all
Stage III—13
Stage IV—27
SMA at L3CT of L3Longitudinal, duration 6 weeks
Open label study
Nil controls; cohort divided into those receiving FO n=17 and SC n=24Effect of FO on body compositionSarcopenic at baseline FO 46%, SC 46%;
Muscle loss rate per 100 days, FO 0.1±1.6%,
SC −6.8±2.6%, p<0.05;
Positive relationship between plasma EPA concentration and rate of muscle gain, r2=0.55, p=0.01
Winter (2012)7810 (10/0)NSCLC in all
Stage IIIA—2
Stage IIIB—3
Stage IV—5
LBM, AMMiDEXALongitudinaln=10
healthy men
Effect on protein anabolism in response to hyperaminoacidaemia, in cachexic insulin-resistant patientsMean AMMi cancer group defined as sarcopenic, p=NS;
Hyperaminoacidaemia stimulates a normal anabolic protein response, p<0.05
Agteresch (2002)5058 (38/20)NSCLC in all including controls (RCT)
All Stage IIIB or IV, breakdown NR
FFM, MUAC, BCMFour skinfold thickness, deuterium dilutionLongitudinal, duration 28 weeks
RCT
Randomised to ATP group n=28, to control group
n=30, all NSCLC
Effect of ATP on body compositionFFM −0.5 kg in controls, but +0.1 kg in ATP group, between group difference p=0.02
MUAC −1.8% in controls, but +1.1% in ATP group, between group difference p=0.02
BCM −0.6% per 4 weeks in controls, but −0.1% in ATP group, between group diff p=0.054
Beijer (2009)79n=100, with LC n=44
n=57 completed 8-week study period
LC in 44% (most frequent), colon cancer 13%, various other cancers 43%
Stage NR ‘preterminal’
MUACUpper arm measurementsLongitudinal, duration 8 weeks
RCT
Baseline: ATP n=51, SC n=49;
Completed study:
ATP n=29, SC n=28
Effect of ATP on nutritional status and survivalPost ATP loss of MUAC
−2.24 mm, SC group
−1.52 mm, p=NS
Short term 0–8 weeks survival benefit with ATP (HR 0.17, p=0.023), and long term 0–6 months survival benefit (HR 0.35, p=0.025)
  • ALM, appendicular lean mass; AMA, arm muscle area; AMMi, appendicular muscle mass index; BCM, body cell mass; BCMi, BCM index; BFMAMA, bone free mid arm muscle area; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP, C reactive protein; CT of L3, CT of the third lumbar space; DEXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; DL, detectable leptin; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; F, female; FFM, fat-free mass; FFMi, FFM index; FO, fish oil; GCR, gastric and colorectal cancer; GI, gastrointestinal; HV, healthy volunteers; IL-15, interleukin 15; ILGF, insulin-like growth factor; LBM, lean body mass; LC, lung cancer; M, male; MI, muscle index; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; MA, muscle area; NR, not recorded; NS, non-significant; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PS, performance status; RCT, randomised controlled trial; REE, resting energy expenditure; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; SMA at L3 or T4, skeletal muscle area at the level of the lumbar vertebra L3 or thoracic vertebra T4; SMAi, skeletal muscle area index; SMMI, skeletal muscle mass index; TNM, tumour, node, metastasis; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MAMC, mid-arm circumference; PIF, proteolysis inducing factor.