Assessment of included studies based on two components of the Medical Research Council11 criteria for complex interventions
Authors | Theoretical quality | Standardisation of delivery |
---|---|---|
A Warrens, personal communication, 2013 | Minimally grounded | Authors allow for and explain variation in intervention delivery Standard training offered to educators delivering intervention |
Allen and Stillwater26 | Minimally grounded | Authors indicate variation |
Alvaro et al31 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation (due to intervention design) |
Alvaro et al20 | Well grounded | Strict standardisation—authors undertook unannounced site visits and developed standard reporting tools for completion at intervention sites |
Andrews et al13 | Moderately grounded | Authors indicate variation |
Arriola et al14 | Well grounded | Strict standardisation |
Callender et al25 | Well grounded | Authors indicate variation |
Cárdenas et al18 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation |
Thornton et al17 | No theoretical grounding | Strict standardisation |
Fahrenwald et al28 | Well grounded | Strict standardisation |
Feeley et al19 | Moderately grounded | Authors allow for and explain variation |
Frates et al29 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation (due to intervention design) |
Harrison et al15 | Well grounded | Strict standardisation of media and print info. Variation but no explanation or assessment of variation in interpersonal elements |
Hebert et al32 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation (due to intervention design) |
Radosevich et al15 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation due to intervention design) |
Resnicow et al12 | Moderately grounded | Strict standardisation. Standard training offered to educators delivering intervention |
Salim et al30 | Minimally grounded | Strict standardisation (due to intervention design) |
Salim et al24 | Minimally grounded | Strict standardisation |