Feeling like an observer in the conference, rather than a colleague
| Involve partners right from the start
|
Inadequate introduction
-
▸ Not knowing what is expected -
▸ Feeling not prepared for the job -
▸ Unaware of the aims of the conference -
▸ Why me?
| Discuss mutual expectations in a face-to-face meeting before the start of the conference
-
▸ What kind of contribution is expected from the partner? -
▸ Does the partner have affinity with the research topic(s)? -
▸ In which phase or activities will the partner be involved? -
▸ Who takes the initiative for contact and how? -
▸ How will the partner be informed and supported along the way? -
▸ What are the specific needs of the partner?
|
Doubts about their added value
-
▸ Feeling too shy to relate personal stories -
▸ Assumption that experiences are obvious and already known to professionals -
▸ Low status of anecdotal knowledge
| Encourage partners deliberately
-
▸ Adapt to a patient-centred communication style and promote open dialogue, attentive listening and authentic contact -
▸ Invite partners to share their perspectives -
▸ Ask open-ended questions and probes -
▸ Give feedback on contributions -
▸ Emphasise the importance of personal experiences and provide reassurance
|
Feeling unable to contribute
-
▸ Lack of knowledge about research and statistics -
▸ Problem with medical jargon -
▸ Problem with the English language -
▸ Hierarchy of professions -
▸ Power imbalance
| Tailor support to the competencies of the partners
-
▸ Provide lay summaries -
▸ Create a learning environment: provide training opportunities -
▸ Distribute reading materials before meetings -
▸ Explain jargon without being asked -
▸ Provide glossaries, journals and websites -
▸ Help partners access and judge scientific literature
|
Feeling disqualified, not listened to
| Be alert for sensitive issues
-
▸ Partners want to be regarded as individuals, from a holistic perspective -
▸ Try to be inclusive -
▸ Respect confidentiality and apply ethical rules -
▸ Acknowledge contributions
|