Table 3

Presentation of results for unadjusted and adjusted analyses (mortality)

Type of comparisonRBCT vs no RBCT (n=23)Volume ‘A’ vs Volume ‘B’ (n=5)Old RBC vs new RBC (n=4)
Summary statistic for each group
 Unadjusted only5 (22%)2 (40%)
 Adjusted only1 (4%)
 Both7 (30%)1 (25%)
 Not reported10 (44%)3 (60%)3 (75%)
Treatment effect
 Unadjusted only1 (4%)
 Adjusted only12 (52%)5 (100%)2 (50%%)
 Both8 (35)1 (25%)
 Not reported2 (9%)1 (25)
CI of treatment effect
 Unadjusted only
 Adjusted only10 (43%)3 (60%)2 (50%)
 Both8 (35%)1 (25%)
 Not reported5 (22%)2 (40%)1 (25%)
p Value for treatment effect
 Unadjusted only7 (30%)
 Adjusted only1 (20%)
 Both1 (4%)1 (25%)
 Not reported15 (66%)4 (80%)3 (75%)
Unadjusted analysis*
 Statistically significant17 (74%)2 (50%)
 Statistically non-significant1 (4%)
 Not reported5 (22%)5 (100%)2 (50%)
Adjusted analysis*
 Statistically significant15 (65%)2 (40%)1 (25%)
 Statistically non-significant7 (31%)2 (40%)3 (75%)
 Not reported1 (4%)1 (20%)
  • *Mortality outcome—if >1 time point analysed, the time point with the non-significant result was recorded.

  • RBCT, red blood cell transfusion.