Table 5

Representative studies on visual impairment in elderly

AuthorPlace/yearSample sizeSettingAge group (years)*Visual impairment (%)
Dev20Nepal (2012)385Residential careMean=7439% (<6/18)†; 20% (<6/60)†
Khanna26Andhra Pradesh, India (2012)2160General population≥5013.6% (<6/18)†; 8% (<6/60)†
Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study—subsample (1996–2000)521General population≥5040.3% (<6/18)†; 11% (<6/60)†
Sainz-Gomez23Spain (2010)392Residential careMean=8231.9% (≤6/18); 14.9% (≤6/60)
Lamoureux21Australia (2009)76Residential careMean=83.946.4% (<6/12)†
Owsley4The USA (2007)380Residential care≥5557% (<6/12)†; 10% (<6/60)†
VanNewkirk25Australia (2000)403Residential careMean=8241% (<6/18)‡; 22% (<6/60)‡
van der Pols18Britain (2000)1362General population and Residential care≥6528.3% (<6/12)‡; 14.3% (<6/18)‡
Nottle22Australia (2000)646Residential careMean=8141% (<6/12)†
Mitchell3Australia (1997)128Residential care≥5011% (<6/60)‡
Tielsch24The USA (1995)499Residential care≥4015.2% (<6/12)‡; 17% (<6/60)‡
  • *Age either mean age or minimum age limit for enrollment is reported.

  • †On the basis of presenting visual acuity in the better eye.

  • ‡On the basis of best corrected Visual acuity in the better eye.