Table 3

Meta-analysis of the statistical performance of validation studies of clinical decision rules for group A streptococcal pharyngitis in children (low vs intermediate and high risk)

Initial CDR (first author)ReferenceChildren /totalSe (95% CI)Sp (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)LR+ (95% CI)LR− (95% CI)OR (95% CI)Percentage of patients at low risk
Breese25–272419/241963 (60 to 66)83 (81 to 85)74 (71 to 77)76 (73 to 78)3.2 (2.8 to 3.6)0.7 (0.6 to 0.7)7.6 (6.2 to 9.3)64
Centor28 29640/111941 (34 to 48)85 (81 to 88)55 (47 to 62)76 (72 to 80)2.0 (1.6 to 2.7)0.8 (0.7 to 0.8)3.2 (2.1 to 4.8)77
McIsaac32–353187/365295 (94 to 96)14 (13 to 15)33 (32 to 35)87 (83 to 90)1.1 (1.0 to 1.1)0.4 (0.3 to 0.5)3.2 (2.3 to 4.4)10
WHO30 312261/22616 (4 to 8)96 (95 to 97)37 (28 to 46)73 (71 to 75)1.6 (1.1 to 2.4)1.0 (1.0 to 1.0)1.6 (1.1 to 2.5)95
Attia36545/54599 (97 to 100)4 (3 to 7)39 (35 to 44)88 (66 to 97)1.0 (1.0 to 1.1)0.2 (0.1 to 0.9)4.9 (1.1 to 21.5)3
Smeesters23220/22084 (73 to 91)41 (34 to 49)33 (26 to 41)88 (79 to 94)1.4 (1.2 to 1.7)0.4 (0.2 to 0.7)3.7 (1.7 to 8.1)35
Joachim24576/576*88 (82 to 92)35 (30 to 40)37 (33 to 42)87 (81 to 91)1.4 (1.2 to 1.5)0.3 (0.2 to 0.5)4.0 (2.4 to 6.6)28
  • The thresholds for low-risk groups were: Breese, score <29 (18–29); Centor, score <2 (0–2); McIsaac, score <1 (0–1); WHO, absence of ADP and exudate; Attia, 0 symptoms; Smeesters, score >8; Joachim, score <2 (0–2).

  • *Results that concerned the population of Smeesters et al and Joachim et al's study.

  • CDR, clinical decision rule; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value of the test; PPV, positive predictive value of the test; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity.