Table 1

Biases arising from salient features of presentation which initiate the diagnostic process and frame the direction of subsequent information gathering

Previous diagnosis labelBecause somebody had wrote down that he had bell's palsy and he'd been seen in hospital …. I immediately thought that's what he had (1)
Story of the insect bite and that was what we were sort of using as our diagnostic tool really (6)
Pre-existing psychosocial problemsAll thought some of the bleeding might be from sexual abuse (31)
Sick notes, and prescriptions and whatever and I thought that that was probably the main reason behind the um sort of um consultations (37)
Reassurance from initial appearanceWhen I called the patient back I got hold of the granny who said oh yes mum's in the shower that as a clue to me meant that maybe the child wasn't that ill (11)
She wasn't terribly unwell (33)
Similarity to a recent case or similarity to representative case built from experienceMy diagnosis was fed by a patient the previous week who'd presented with an ischemic foot (40)
And I thought he had cancer because of the mass and the weight loss and the paleness (44)
Incorrect localisation of salient featuresVomiting and sweating and diarrhoea  … epigastric pain (10)
Epigastric discomfort . …must be indigestion (20)
Common things occurring commonly (probabilistic reasoning)Viral infections are common (16)
My preconception at the time was that a young <30 year old is very, very unlikely to have bowel cancer (32)
Ignoring as well as over or under estimating red flags or critical cuesHe came in hopping, which is quite unusual. Not weight bearing at all is quite unusual (30)
Normal chest on examination (24)
Vague presenting symptoms, no salient features recognisedFatigue from whatever cause (3); it was all very vague (28)
Atypical leg pain couldn't work out what was going on (21)