Type of patient | Urbanisation level | Deprived neighbourhood | % Within deprived neighbourhood | |||
No (patients) | No (%) | Yes (patients) | Yes (%) | |||
Starter group | 1 | 34 662 | 76.3 | 10 796 | 23.7 | 86.5 |
2 | 48 673 | 96.6 | 1689 | 3.4% | 13.5 | |
3 | 31 107 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | – | |
4 | 28 283 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | – | |
5 | 11 164 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | – | |
Total | 153 889 | 92.5 | 12 485 | 7.5 | 100.0 | |
Continuation group | 1 | 59 714 | 76.2 | 18 644 | 23.8 | 85.5 |
2 | 81 406 | 96.3 | 3155 | 3.7 | 14.5 | |
3 | 50 853 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | – | |
4 | 48 511 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | – | |
5 | 20 754 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | – | |
Total | 261 237 | 92.3 | 21 799 | 7.7 | 100.0 | |
Total patients | 415 126 | 92.4 | 34 284 | 7.6 |
The sample is described in absolute numbers for the Starter and the Continuation groups, stratified by living in an urbanised area (levels 1–5) and a dichotomous measure of neighbourhood deprivation. Furthermore, in the last column, tabulation is presented for living in a deprived neighbourhood as a function of level of urbanisation (eg, in the Starter group, 86.5% of the sample living in deprived neighbourhoods lived in an area with urbanisation level 1).